These all look very consistent and will come in very useful for
someone making renderings, a problem with some of the current iconsets
that has been mentioned is their inconsistency.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap
Brian Quinion schrieb:
> These are released as Public Domain as of now but are still a work in
> progress - there are still many icons to draw - but I felt we now had
> enough that we should let people know what we are doing.
could you please add a license file to the root directory of your icon fi
> could you please add a license file to the root directory of your icon files
Doh! Now done.
>> A lot of them are based on existing map icons, US Park icons or other
>> PD sources (we are not interested in reinventing the wheel) many
>> others are brand new. Some we are happy with, others sti
This roundabout used to be perfect, with layers and everything. Now it's
rubbish. Even some of the nodes are gone.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-25.77304&lon=28.19906&zoom=17&layers=B00FTF
We badly need a 'wayback machine'. I still have the original data but it's
in 0.4 format.
http://wiki.o
Hi,
Nic Roets wrote:
> This roundabout used to be perfect, with layers and everything. Now it's
> rubbish. Even some of the nodes are gone.
Hm, I have reverted the changes made by "thebigfatgeek" in the 10
minutes that were spent editing that area, but I think this has made
matters worse - it
Steve - are there any more details / photos etc about this?
Nick
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Andy Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll give my public thanks to Steve here, not only for collecting the
> award but also for the original mapnik layer on which the cycle map
> was originally bas
Nick
I have asked organisers to send me the photo of the presentation and the
citation text as soon as possible.
It will also eventually appear here:
http://www.cartography.org.uk/default.asp?contentID=579
Cheers
STEVE
-Original Message-
From: Nick Black [mailto:[EMAI
A few hours ago a new version of the OpenStreetMap Routing Service has come
online. I think is has evolved enough to go public 'officially'...
The (yet another, I know) OpenStreetMap Routing Service is linking together
off-the-shelf software such as Gosmore routing engine, Gazetteer namefinder
ser
Lambertus schrieb:
> I hope this effort in collecting readily available software will be useful
> in validating/improving the data, inspire further software developement and
> attract new contributors. Please give it a try and tell me what you think:
>
> http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/~lambertus/rou
I just tried it in my (newly mapped) area. Kudos, first routing service that
works for me, and the interface is nice.
Only critic I see, is that more emphasis could be but on choosing larger
ways when several are available. Like, choose a secondary instead of an
unclassified if it makes the trip ju
Nic Roets wrote:
This roundabout used to be perfect, with layers and everything. Now
it's rubbish. Even some of the nodes are gone.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?
lat=-25.77304&lon=28.19906&zoom=17&layers=B00FTF
We badly need a 'wayback machine'.
We already have one for small-scale local
Lambertus wrote:
> A few hours ago a new version of the OpenStreetMap Routing Service has come
> online. I think is has evolved enough to go public 'officially'...
Interesting choice of routes when going north up the M6 but I'm sure at times
that taking the back roads would be quicker ;)
--
Les
Thanks,
Is this the main site?
http://hypercube.telascience.org/~kleptog/
It's not immediately obvious from the wiki. Could those shapefiles be
available via the planet directory?
-mike.
On Sep 5, 2008, at 3:55 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> The coastline checker as a side effe
> Some nitpicking (using FF3 on WinXP)
>
> One thing annoyed me while playing around: disabling the edit text
> fields while waiting for namefinder and routing results is confusing -
> more than once I wasn't sure what's going on!
>
The site supports only one simultaneous AJAX call at the moment
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 18:31:38 +0200, "leblatt" <> wrote:
> Only critic I see, is that more emphasis could be but on choosing larger
> ways when several are available. Like, choose a secondary instead of an
> unclassified if it makes the trip just a bit longer, but much easier and
> safer.
I've notic
On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:00 +0100, Lester Caine <> wrote:
> Interesting choice of routes when going north up the M6 but I'm sure at
> times
> that taking the back roads would be quicker ;)
>
Do you have an example (using the Permalink) that gives a 'faulty' route? There
are several possibilitie
Gosmore doesn't yet support maxspeed. Nor does it prefer straight roads over
twisting roads.
It would be helpful if there is a standardized format on the wiki for
specifying default access restrictions, default speeds etc. (Routing cheat
sheet) Then I will know what to implement and mappers will k
I Consider recycling should be encouraged, and I map a recycling point when
I come across one. But I find it abnormally tedious to tag the type of goods
that can be recycled. This information should have been made easier to tag.
For instance, instead of :
amenity=recycling
recycling:cans=yes
2008/9/6 leblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I Consider recycling should be encouraged, and I map a recycling point
> when I come across one. But I find it abnormally tedious to tag the type of
> goods that can be recycled. This information should have been made easier to
> tag. For instance, instead o
leblatt wrote:
>
> I Consider recycling should be encouraged, and I map a recycling point
> when I come across one. But I find it abnormally tedious to tag the
> type of goods that can be recycled. This information should have been
> made easier to tag. For instance, instead of :
>
> amenity=rec
High
When using the name finder, and I search for "Hay Lane", it finds one entry
for the US, but is unable to find the road in the UK.
However, if I use the post code, (NW9 0NA), it finds the road "Hay Lane" in
the UK with out any problems.
What is the reason for this disparity?
Chris Hill wrote:
> leblatt wrote:
>>
>> I Consider recycling should be encouraged, and I map a recycling
>> point when I come across one. But I find it abnormally tedious to tag
>> the type of goods that can be recycled. This information should have
>> been made easier to tag. For instance, ins
Hi,
I just mapped a street and did not find a proper access tag. The sign
can be found in Wikimedia Commons [0]. It says it is forbidden to drive
with hazardous material. I don't think I'm the first one to map such
streets, since those signs are relatively common, so Is there any
solution how
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 14:28 +0100, Nick Black wrote:
> Steve - are there any more details / photos etc about this?
Hear, hear! I've added the news of this award to my presentation on
Monday (Kitchener-Waterloo Linux User Group) and would love to have a
photo of Steve accepting, or Andy holding th
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 17:06 +0200, Lambertus wrote:
> A few hours ago a new version of the OpenStreetMap Routing Service has come
> online. I think is has evolved enough to go public 'officially'...
Bravo, Lambertus!
This also seems much faster than when I was looking at it yesterday.
_
Bravo! OSMers.
In the last few days I've been brushing up my presentation slides for an
Introduction to OpenStreetMap talk that I'm giving on Monday. I also
gave the talk about two weeks ago and these are things that I just have
to bring to the attention of these new potential OSM enthusiasts.
26 matches
Mail list logo
