Hi Folks,
Thought this might be interesting to some of you...
http://www.edushi.com
It's a map site that's been around for quite a while... The number of cities
covered and the area covered within those cities is growing all the time...
But... What makes it different to any other site is the fact
On 30 Nov 2008, at 22:28, ivom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Scrolling through the stuff happening last days on
> http://blogs.openstreetmap.org/ it just came to my mind how
> practical it
> could be to have a way to filter posts based on some sort of lonlat
> boundingbox.
>
> Possible currently or ask sant
Hi,
Scrolling through the stuff happening last days on
http://blogs.openstreetmap.org/ it just came to my mind how practical it
could be to have a way to filter posts based on some sort of lonlat
boundingbox.
Possible currently or ask santa?
Bye,
Ivom
As well as "You can't do this" and "You must do this" we need "You may
do this (that normally you can't)". Where I live, you can't do a
U-turn at traffic lights unless there's a sign that says you can. If
we try and mark this by putting relations at every light banning
U-turns, we'll just end up w
Hi,
Gervase Markham wrote:
>> Most of all since we're growing exponentially and even if we had 90% of
>> mappers agree on something today, in two or three months those 90% would
>> perhaps only form 30% of the community...
>
> This is actually an argument _for_ Map_Features and some sort of
> m
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 22:05:31 Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Not sure if it was exactly this problem, but it is due to the size. I
> don't know if the word "island" is appropriate, more likely a large
> rock :) Did someone actually get on to the thing to measure it? It's
> certainly way sma
David
I just tested it with /api/0.5/relation[type=route] and the response looked
ok. Plenty of relation elements.
What query did you actually use?
80n
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:09 PM, David Carmean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I recently ran a XAPI query for relations, which returned only n
I've implemented some changes to the experimental UK postcode searches
in the Namefinder.
And for everyone I also made it ignore leading and trailing numbers in
the first search term, so searching for "31 Hinton Road, Fulbourn" or
"Via Giordano 14, Milano" will still get a hit even though you qu
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thinking of a T shaped junction where maybe someone adds a "sharp right"
> turning service
Which can be hacked^H^H^H^H^H^H solved by relaxing the current requirement
for angles to be multiples of 90 degrees.
So we have
Hi,
Nic Roets wrote:
> My guess is that your opposition is based on the fact that some (future)
> routing system may not have enough information to calculate angles esp. when
> non-junction nodes was removed during prepossessing.
I simply want a clear, non-interpreted rule that identifies the
pa
Hi,
One more query I have.
On the roads that I survey, I have always found that my GPX goes away from
what the mapnik rendered.
I assume that mapnik is working on standard conventions of road width.
Here in New Delhi, we have lanes of width ~3m. Motorways have a fix 4 lanes
per direction.
Everythi
Please tell me your deletions in south delhi if any more. :)
Im busy perfecting the ways myself. They are not pretty, I agree.
Atleast after YOURS, i maked gosmore and verify faster.
Suggest me how to make neat parallel ways on JOSM.
I could not find a tool on it that does that like. Same trouble
Hi,
tsk1979 has responded quickly. Thanks
How to revert the edits:
In the online editor (Click edit on the page below) delete the newly
generated ways, then press the button U, and after a while all the old
data will show up. Click the lock icon, then the new way is active,
and when deselec
On Nov 30, 2008, at 17:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One of the ways that I saw had removed a street is here.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.57944&lon=77.2855&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
You're right, they were mapped and deleted:
http://openstreetmap.org/browse/way/25524666/history
Chee
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:06 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the ways that I saw had removed a street is here.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.57944&lon=77.2855&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
>
> This is one of the two motorways in New Delhi -> DND Noida Flyover. I
> had made two
perfect!
Thanks Robvert!
On 30/11/2008, Robert Vollmert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2008, at 06:22, ビカス ヤダワ (vikas yadav) wrote:
>> Here in the streets of New Delhi and Gurgaon, we have lots of speed
>> breakers (or bumps - These are small, raised portions on the road to
>> slow down
Hi,
One of the ways that I saw had removed a street is here.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.57944&lon=77.2855&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
This is one of the two motorways in New Delhi -> DND Noida Flyover. I
had made two ways on this for two directions. Im sure about this. I
don't see two ways
Do you have some example queries?
On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:09, David Carmean wrote:
>
> I recently ran a XAPI query for relations, which returned only nodes
> and not the
> relations themselves. Not very useful, I'd say :)
>
> XAPI queries for ways have also been returning associated relations.
>
I recently ran a XAPI query for relations, which returned only nodes and not
the
relations themselves. Not very useful, I'd say :)
XAPI queries for ways have also been returning associated relations.
Any XAPI developers on the list?
___
talk mai
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the record, I am strongly opposed to automated processing of the
> "restriction" ...
>
My guess is that your opposition is based on the fact that some (future)
routing system may not have enough information to calcula
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want a situation where the two parts of the road are unambiguously
> identified by the "from" and "to" members, meaning that if any of these do
> not start/end at the junction they have to be split.
What do you think of
Do you have a link to the part of the map that you are talking about?
That will allow other people to look at the data in that area. Also
what is the name of the relevant road?
Shaun
On 30 Nov 2008, at 05:16, ビカス ヤダワ (vikas yadav) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I checked one of the sections that I had surv
On 30/11/2008 13:06, Gervase Markham wrote:
> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> I'm not sure why the need to reuse existing software at all. Bugtracking is
>> the sort of thing you expect to find in 'Rails For Dummies' as My First
>> Rails App - if you’ve got a decent framework it’s pretty elementary.
>
On 30/11/2008 13:09, Gervase Markham wrote:
> David Earl wrote:>
>> However, if we start applying similar techniques to state captials or
>> other hierarchies, a search inferred from a loose syntax will not be
>> enough and I need to provide a more formal way for mechanical clients to
>> constra
2008/11/30 Tanveer Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Tanveer Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:46 AM, ビカス ヤダワ (vikas yadav)
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I checked one of the sections that I had surveyed, mapped and upl
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> I'm not sure why the need to reuse existing software at all. Bugtracking is
> the sort of thing you expect to find in 'Rails For Dummies' as My First
> Rails App - if you’ve got a decent framework it’s pretty elementary.
As someone who's spent the last nine years working
Tom Chance wrote:
> Search 3 - Show pinpoints for the results on the map, so at least you can
> quickly discard all those results from the wrong side of the globe.
Search 4 - use the current viewport as a hint.
Gerv
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstr
David Earl wrote:>
> However, if we start applying similar techniques to state captials or
> other hierarchies, a search inferred from a loose syntax will not be
> enough and I need to provide a more formal way for mechanical clients to
> constrain their searches. As it stands "city" is ambiguou
Marc Schütz wrote:
> Bugzilla as a backend would certainly be nice, but as a frontend it is
> obviously inappropriate. I don't know whether Bugzilla supports alternate
> frontends; if so, it could be worthwhile building one that fits our needs.
Modern Bugzillas have an XML-RPC interface, and als
Hi
I tried this:
{{Coordinate|article=/|NS=48.054048|EW=14.705797|type=city|region=AT-03}}
But ist does not work.
How to make a link to the map? Hardcoded?
Bernhard
begin:vcard
fn:Bernhard Zwischenbrugger
n:Zwischenbrugger;Bernhard
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
note;quoted-printable:lieb
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Most of all since we're growing exponentially and even if we had 90% of
> mappers agree on something today, in two or three months those 90% would
> perhaps only form 30% of the community...
This is actually an argument _for_ Map_Features and some sort of
meritocracy, not
David Earl schrieb:
> On Sunday 30 November 2008 03:07:02 Ulf Lamping wrote:
>> I've just added a table to that wiki page that tries to map existing
>> road signs to the corresponding restriction values.
>
> In most situations where you see these signs they are used in
> conjunction with a No Ent
On Sunday 30 November 2008 03:07:02 Ulf Lamping wrote:
> I've just added a table to that wiki page that tries to map existing
> road signs to the corresponding restriction values.
In most situations where you see these signs they are used in
conjunction with a No Entry at the end of a one way str
Cartinus schrieb:
> On Sunday 30 November 2008 03:07:02 Ulf Lamping wrote:
>> I've just added a table to that wiki page that tries to map existing
>> road signs to the corresponding restriction values.
>
> I don't know if this is the same everywhere in Europe, but sign 7b (the only
> square sign
34 matches
Mail list logo
