On 6 Jan 2009, at 06:45, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> Roman Neumüller wrote:
>> I occasioanlly open hires areas in JOSM when stumbling over
>> them. Boy: what a whole bunch of errors one then starts to
>> fix...! All potlatch-related I suppose (sorry Rich ;-)
>
> I'd prefer (well, I would, wouldn
Peter Miller wrote:
> Potlatch does sometime create duplicate ways for me when I
> splits features. These duplicates are invisible using Potlatch
> and the quantity of them varies from occasion to occasion.
This is a server issue more than anything else: it happens in times of
server slowness.
2009/1/6 Tanveer Singh :
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Ulf Lamping
> wrote:
>> Stephen Hope schrieb:
>>> It's not hard to test. When I was unsure if my device was doing this
>>> or not, I set it to snap to road, and then took it for a little walk
>>> along the edge and then cut some corners
> The solution is either to move splitting ways entirely to the server (so,
> although the user hits 'split', the way isn't actually split until the
> server returns a message), or to fix the server. I'd be interested to know
> _why_ the server runs so slowly at certain times.
... or by fixing Pot
2009/1/6 "Marc Schütz" :
>> The solution is either to move splitting ways entirely to the server (so,
>> although the user hits 'split', the way isn't actually split until the
>> server returns a message), or to fix the server. I'd be interested to know
>> _why_ the server runs so slowly at certain
Marc Schütz wrote:
>> The solution is either to move splitting ways entirely to the server (so,
>> although the user hits 'split', the way isn't actually split until the
>> server returns a message), or to fix the server. I'd be interested to know
>> _why_ the server runs so slowly at certain time
> >> The solution is either to move splitting ways entirely to the server
> (so,
> >> although the user hits 'split', the way isn't actually split until the
> >> server returns a message), or to fix the server. I'd be interested to
> know
> >> _why_ the server runs so slowly at certain times.
> >
>
When I heard about the possibility of "OSM on Garmin", I imagined
something like the Mapnik Slippy Map on my GPS screen. Now I have a
Legend HCx, it turns out that I get the Garmin vector rendering with OSM
data behind it. This is clearly much better than nothing, but does the
gmapsupp.img format s
A quick google came up with this:
http://freegeographytools.com/2008/converting-raster-maps-to-garmin-vector-format-with-bmap2mp
I had previously heard of Moagu, as noted in that article, but strayed
away from it due to being somewhat unfree.
2009/1/6 Gervase Markham :
> When I heard about the po
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> When I heard about the possibility of "OSM on Garmin", I imagined
> something like the Mapnik Slippy Map on my GPS screen. Now I have a
> Legend HCx, it turns out that I get the Garmin vector rendering with OSM
> data behind it. This is cle
Gervase Markham wrote:
> When I heard about the possibility of "OSM on Garmin", I imagined
> something like the Mapnik Slippy Map on my GPS screen. Now I have a
> Legend HCx, it turns out that I get the Garmin vector rendering with OSM
> data behind it. This is clearly much better than nothing, but
2009/1/7 David Lynch
> There's a bulk import happening of data in Massachusetts, USA, and
> Maplint is flagging every single node with not-in-map-features because
> of the "attribution" tag applied to these nodes (see
>
> http://server.tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=maplint&z=12&x=1239&y=151
Hi. Did the webhosting for this project get organised yet? I would
like to put it as a featured image, but not if that means that the map
dies from too much traffic.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_image_proposals#Hiking_map
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Nop wrote:
>
> Hi folk
I definitely promised free hosting for any map tiles that need to be hosted.
I seem to have lost my e-mail conversations with the parties involved. Can
you guys e-mail me again? I will continue setting up the web space for you!
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:34 PM, OJ W wrote:
> Hi. Did the webhosti
Igor Brejc wrote:
> IMHO converting OSM vector data into raster images and then showing them
> on a Garmin unit would mean losing a lot of quality and speed, not to
> mention how much more memory card space such maps would consume.
Could be. But they'd look a heck of a lot nicer, and have useful
Gervase Markham wrote:
> Igor Brejc wrote:
>
>> IMHO converting OSM vector data into raster images and then showing them
>> on a Garmin unit would mean losing a lot of quality and speed, not to
>> mention how much more memory card space such maps would consume.
>>
>
> Could be. But they'd
Igor Brejc wrote:
> What kind of a problem are you having with POIs? What do you mean by
> "useful"? I'm wondering because I'm working right now on POIs for
> GroundTruth.
Actually, it's not as bad as I thought. They didn't show on the zoom
level I was using, and some I expected to be there aren
I didn't give it because I didn't remember, and it isn't what he's
looking for. It was the testing of the snap-to road functions and the
track-logging I remembered. It is a Mio PDA, model 7nn (720, 730?).
I can't look it up right now because I loaned it to somebody for the
Christmas holidays, and
18 matches
Mail list logo
