[OSM-talk] Minute Diffs and 0.6 Breakages

2009-04-21 Thread Brett Henderson
Hi All, I'm cross-posting to dev and talk. Please reply to dev only to avoid unnecessary noise on the mailing lists. The osmosis minute diffs were broken after 0.6 went live. I'm hoping the problems have been fixed now and have re-generated all impacted changesets. If you are consuming diff

Re: [OSM-talk] Postgresql switchover

2009-04-21 Thread maning sambale
Not authoritative but perhaps this: http://blogs.computerworld.com/oracle_sun_what_happens_to_mysql :) On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Steve Singer wrote: > > Some of the Postgresql folks are looking for some info for advocacy purposes > on the change to postgresql. > > I suspect they want to

[OSM-talk] Postgresql switchover

2009-04-21 Thread Steve Singer
Some of the Postgresql folks are looking for some info for advocacy purposes on the change to postgresql. I suspect they want to know A) The main reasons that motivated the change B) Someone who they can quote as being from OSM. (ie for press materials/use cases) If anyone is interested repl

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Gregory Williams
> -Original Message- > From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk- > boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Rolf Bode-Meyer > Sent: 21 April 2009 19:09 > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] We're back > > 2009/4/21 Gregory Williams > : > > The tag values shown in t

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Mike Harris
Goodie goodie - now we can all learn German Ausgezeichnet - jetzt können wir alle die schöne deutschen Sprache lernen (:>) And hearty congratulations to the hard-working team ... Mike Harris -Original Message- From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net] Sent: 21 April 2009 10:

[OSM-talk] Ruby Error while adding user as friend?

2009-04-21 Thread Ciprian Talaba
Hi, I am getting a Ruby error when I am trying to add some user as my friend. It seems to be related to some username (for now I can only notice this error if the username contains a space). The error is below: The OpenStreetMap server encountered an unexpected condition that prevented it from fu

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Nop
Grant Slater schrieb: > check again and report. Appears to be fixed. bye Nop ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Rolf Bode-Meyer
2009/4/21 Gregory Williams : > The tag values shown in the non-history version of the call are only > from the first version, which was what I was attempting to fix the value > for (I meant to type National cycle Network National Route 43, not ...4). Hm, I see something different, "route" in all t

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Grant Slater
check again and report. / Grant Nop wrote: > Hi! > > > I noted that in the OSM inbox, all old messages are truncated to about > the same length. I guess this is a result of transferring them. > > Are there any plans to restore them? > > bye > Nop > > ___

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 21 Apr 2009, at 18:32, Nop wrote: > > Hi! > > > I noted that in the OSM inbox, all old messages are truncated to about > the same length. I guess this is a result of transferring them. > > Are there any plans to restore them? > This problem was found and sorted in the past few hours. Can you

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Nop
Hi! I noted that in the OSM inbox, all old messages are truncated to about the same length. I guess this is a result of transferring them. Are there any plans to restore them? bye Nop ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://list

Re: [OSM-talk] Delay before the data is visible?

2009-04-21 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 21 Apr 2009, at 17:32, Ed Loach wrote: >> How large is the current delay before uploaded data became >> visible? > > My question is slightly different. I uploaded two changesets > successfully earlier from JOSM (the third took over an hour so I > clicked Abort and ended up losing my edits, so

Re: [OSM-talk] Delay before the data is visible?

2009-04-21 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Ed Loach wrote: >> How large is the current delay before uploaded data became >> visible? > > My question is slightly different. I uploaded two changesets > successfully earlier from JOSM (the third took over an hour so I > clicked Abort and ended up losing my edit

Re: [OSM-talk] Delay before the data is visible?

2009-04-21 Thread Ed Loach
> How large is the current delay before uploaded data became > visible? My question is slightly different. I uploaded two changesets successfully earlier from JOSM (the third took over an hour so I clicked Abort and ended up losing my edits, so lucky there weren't too many. I'll try again when thi

Re: [OSM-talk] Delay before the data is visible?

2009-04-21 Thread Tom Hughes
Ben Laenen wrote: > Are the servers really so insanely busy? I can see only a few people > uploading something every minute > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets and that doesn't really > strike me as something this new server shouldn't be able to handle > smoothly... Downloads are

Re: [OSM-talk] Delay before the data is visible?

2009-04-21 Thread Ben Laenen
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Jonathan Bennett wrote: > MP wrote: > > How large is the current delay before uploaded data became visible? > > I've uploaded some changes in JOSM, provided a comment ... and when > > I re-downloaded the area again, my changes were not there. > > The servers are *very, ver

Re: [OSM-talk] Delay before the data is visible?

2009-04-21 Thread Jonathan Bennett
Frederik Ramm wrote: > That would be a bug in JOSM then. The API has no delay. It could be that you get no warning when the upload fails under certain circumstances. Hasn't happened to me on the latest SVN build, though. -- Jonathan (Jonobennett) ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Delay before the data is visible?

2009-04-21 Thread Jonathan Bennett
MP wrote: > How large is the current delay before uploaded data became visible? > I've uploaded some changes in JOSM, provided a comment ... and when I > re-downloaded the area again, my changes were not there. The servers are *very, very* busy right now, and it's possible that your changes didn't

Re: [OSM-talk] Delay before the data is visible?

2009-04-21 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, > How large is the current delay before uploaded data became visible? > I've uploaded some changes in JOSM, provided a comment ... and when I > re-downloaded the area again, my changes were not there. That would be a bug in JOSM then. The API has no delay. Bye Frederik _

[OSM-talk] Delay before the data is visible?

2009-04-21 Thread MP
How large is the current delay before uploaded data became visible? I've uploaded some changes in JOSM, provided a comment ... and when I re-downloaded the area again, my changes were not there. Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http:/

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Gregory Williams
> -Original Message- > From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk- > boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Ed Loach > Sent: 21 April 2009 14:28 > To: 'Richard Fairhurst'; talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] We're back > > Richard wrote: > > I know of two issues with P

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Ed Loach
Richard wrote: > I know of two issues with Potlatch 0.11 at the moment. One is > relation > handling (actually I see Ed's just posted about that) - not > clear yet > whether this is Potlatch-specific. JOSM showed the relation that the way was part of, but there seems to be a different relation is

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Martijn van Exel wrote: > Great. Congratulations to all involved. You pulled a massive, great > job. Potlatch seems to be stuck for me at 'Loading Presets'. It does > say 0.11. Firefox and Chrome on windows. Is this load-related or > something else altogether? Load-related. I know of two issu

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Andy Allan
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Steve Hill wrote: > The changeset stuff looks really good, and I note the welcome addition of > a "comment" field.  Is there any way of getting an RSS feed (or similar) > of recent changesets and their comments within a specific bounding box? > That'd be really g

Re: [OSM-talk] reverting a changesets

2009-04-21 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 21 Apr 2009, at 13:18, Maning Sambale wrote: > now the most important question: > > I made a mistake, how do I revert it? Was the whole changeset a mistake, or just part of it? If the mistake is only a small part of the changeset, you will still need to do it manually. Potlatch has the hi

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Ed Loach
Richard wrote: > Specifically, Potlatch > at present creates a new changeset when you open it, so if you > don't > actually make any edits then an empty changeset will result. Talking of Potlatch, should I open a trac ticket for the following? An example way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Brett Henderson
Shaun McDonald wrote: > > On 21 Apr 2009, at 12:27, Steve Hill wrote: > >> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote: >> >>> ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading >>> at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time >>> being. :) >> >> The deltas

[OSM-talk] reverting a changesets

2009-04-21 Thread Maning Sambale
now the most important question: I made a mistake, how do I revert it? -- cheers, maning -- "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ---

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Martijn van Exel
Great. Congratulations to all involved. You pulled a massive, great job. Potlatch seems to be stuck for me at 'Loading Presets'. It does say 0.11. Firefox and Chrome on windows. Is this load-related or something else altogether? martijn van exel -+- mve...@gmail.com -+- http://www.schaaltreinen.nl

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 21 Apr 2009, at 12:27, Steve Hill wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > >> ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's >> uploading >> at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time >> being. :) > > The deltas in http://planet.openstreetm

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Pieren wrote: > Another short question : empty changesets are possible ? > (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/876923) > (I tried to download the xml but no response - I guess it is the > server current load). Indeed, there's no prohibition on empty changesets. Specifically, Po

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Steve Hill
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading > at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time > being. :) The deltas in http://planet.openstreetmap.org/minute aren't being updated at the moment - what's t

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Pieren
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse: >   http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets > Just great ! Big thanks to the sysadmin team. A small note : the changesets page says "Recently closed changesets:" but we ca

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back - forum login

2009-04-21 Thread Lambertus
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: > Login in the forum still seems to be broken. > Getting 400 Bad Request on login. > Yes, apparently the user details API call has changed enough to break the forum authentication for now. I'm working on it. ___ ta

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 21 Apr 2009, at 11:18, Ed Avis wrote: Does this mean you can now set up Postgres on your PC, load a planet file, and get the same database layout as the main server? Yes, though it is still a different database layout compared to that used by Mapnik. For the time being you can use

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Ed Avis
Congratulations! Excellent work. I will start uploading my backlog of edits shortly... Does this mean you can now set up Postgres on your PC, load a planet file, and get the same database layout as the main server? -- Ed Avis ___ talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back - forum login

2009-04-21 Thread marcus.wolschon
Login in the forum still seems to be broken. Getting 400 Bad Request on login. Marcus ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Richard Fairhurst
...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets Mad props (as the kids say) to Tom, Gran

Re: [OSM-talk] Rough Tracks

2009-04-21 Thread Paul Johnson
kaerast wrote: > Claudius wrote: > >> "Down-grade" them to grade4 or grade5. It's not your job to fix the >> router's routing in the data. >> > > The wiki suggests that the track grades are for surface type rather than > usability. Yet there does also exist surface=* so I'm not sure. The > g

Re: [OSM-talk] Rough Tracks

2009-04-21 Thread Paul Johnson
Mike Harris wrote: > Oh dear - and I thought this was going to be simple! We're back to the > confusion and overlap between the various keys and their values. If the > mode_of_transport=yes/no tags have the same implications as the access= tags > then do we need both? Yes. Access= sets the defaul