andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> If you had read the message to which you were responding though you
> would notice I'm not suggesting the canvec tag be removed, from which
> the osm tag was derived, just the second canvec tag that contains a
> textual, english language definition of the first tag. On
In response to the latest round of bugs, i wrote bug 13:Too many tags.
When writing the page, i found the solution is always in the clarity of the
argument. When the argument is so clear, there's even less arguments. :-)
Look forward to any feedback.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Canve
2009/6/18 Alan Millar :
>> There's a 1:1 correspondence between the value of amenity= and the
>> value of canvec:value_definition= so one of them should be removed.
>> There's a 1:1 correspondence between the value of canvec:entity= and
>> the value of canvec:entity_definition= so one of them shoul
>> It should be sufficient to keep the canvec:UUID, source and attribution
>> tags, and maybe a few of the other canvec:* (CMAS?). I don't see why we
>> would need most of the others. If someone is really interested in them,
>> they
>> can look them up in Canvec using the UUID.
Right. And anyone
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:46 PM, SteveC wrote:
> Hi
>
> Linked off of stateofthemap.org are the SOTM '08 videos:
>
> http://blog.signal2noise.ie/~eason/sotm08/
>
> But they're incomplete and super, super, super slow to load.
>
> So does anyone know if the rest will be put up?
>
> And, can an
Hi
Linked off of stateofthemap.org are the SOTM '08 videos:
http://blog.signal2noise.ie/~eason/sotm08/
But they're incomplete and super, super, super slow to load.
So does anyone know if the rest will be put up?
And, can anyone mirror them somewhere useful?
Best
Steve
_
2009/6/17 Sam Vekemans :
> Answered below,
>
> Twitter: @Acrosscanada
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:57 AM, "Marc Schütz" wrote:
>>
>> > I think the definitions really don't belong in the the data -- perhaps
>> > if you want to see them, your brows
On 14 Jun 2009, at 01:49, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> There are no full history dumps currently - having such dump would
>> enable this type of query quite easily.
>
> I am sure we will have them at some point in time.
>
>> Well, there could be slight problem with pre-0.6 data (no order in
>>
On 14 Jun 2009, at 17:13, Andy Street wrote:
> When the A3 bypass[0] was constructed the route crossed several
> existing
> rights of way. Rather than building bridges or underpasses it appears
> that the planners struck on the novel idea of asking pedestrians to
> walk
> across four lanes of
Answered below,
Twitter: @Acrosscanada
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:57 AM, "Marc Schütz" wrote:
> > I think the definitions really don't belong in the the data -- perhaps
> > if you want to see them, your browser should look them up in some
> > table
2009/6/17 Eric Wolf :
> It's just the Brits trying to re-establish their imperial dominance over the
> world.
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Shaun McDonald
> wrote:
>>
>> On 17 Jun 2009, at 18:17, Joe Richards wrote:
>>
>> One of the main annoyances that people tell me that they have with O
Hello !
I just have an import failure. this is just because my holux m-241
with mtkbable returns me points like this :
nan
1969-08-02T00:22:53Z
Invalid coordinate is ignored than invalid points like this should
also be ignore ?
Than where can I notify the bug ?
CU
Stéphane
--
Stéphane B
On Wednesday 17 Jun 2009 19:19:20 Eric Wolf wrote:
> It's just the Brits trying to re-establish their imperial dominance over
> the world.
I'll submit a suggestion on trac for the appropriate changes to the
stylesheets: http://tinyurl.com/ns8852
Regards,
Tom
It's just the Brits trying to re-establish their imperial dominance over the
world.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Shaun McDonald
wrote:
>
> On 17 Jun 2009, at 18:17, Joe Richards wrote:
>
> One of the main annoyances that people tell me that they have with OSM
> is that whenever they visit th
On 17 Jun 2009, at 18:17, Joe Richards wrote:
One of the main annoyances that people tell me that they have with
OSM
is that whenever they visit the site, the map shows them just the UK.
I checked it (from other random computers, not my laptop) when I was
in Thailand and Australia and it al
One of the main annoyances that people tell me that they have with OSM
is that whenever they visit the site, the map shows them just the UK.I checked
it (from other random computers, not my laptop) when I was in Thailand and
Australia and it always showed the UK. Is the UK the default if IP reso
2009/6/16 Yann Coupin :
> Maybe we could also leverage the new part of HTML 5 that enables
> geolocation to center the map on the user's current location. I know
> IE doesn't support it yet, but waiting for IE support of a new
> technology is pretty much like saying that you will lag years behind..
Joseph Jon Booker wrote:
> Just wondering, how much of that is potlatch creating a new
> changeset when you click the 'edit' tab without changing
> anything? (or has that bug been fixed?)
Since Potlatch 1.0, changesets are started:
- in "edit with save": when you first save your changes
- in "
Hi,
I used php_bulk_upload to make some changes a while back, and it has
been recently pointed out that it really screwed things up - creating
many duplicate nodes across a very wide area. Rather than just
uploading the large number of changes I'd made, it also uploaded new
copies of existing nod
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Simone Cortesi wrote:
> hi,
>
> just a minor stats:
>
> it took us 4 years: from april 2005 to go from changeset 1 to
> 1.000.000 in april 2009.
>
> We are now, after only 2 months, already at changeset 1.500.000
>
I think that this is skewed by the fact that pe
2009/6/17 wer-ist-roger :
> Hej Jens,
>
> nice mockup. But I like more the idea of having thumbnails side by side then
> this tab-like style.
Yes, it is indeed quite nice, but IMHO not suitable for a large
variety of different Maps (lets say 20-30).
cheers,
Martin
___
> I think the definitions really don't belong in the the data -- perhaps
> if you want to see them, your browser should look them up in some
> table rather than load from the data.
+1
It should be sufficient to keep the canvec:UUID, source and attribution tags,
and maybe a few of the other canve
Hej Jens,
nice mockup. But I like more the idea of having thumbnails side by side then
this tab-like style.
roger
Am Dienstag 16 Juni 2009 schrieb Jens Frank:
> 2009/6/16 k...@vielevisels
>
> > So, if you don't take some time to discover what osm can do, you probably
> > won't find it. There o
Hi,
2009/6/17 Sam Vekemans :
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.8221&lon=-124.053&zoom=12&layers=B000FTF
This looks really nice and I'm happy to see the POIs converted too.
>
> You can see alot more detail on this area. The only feature that isnt loaded
> is the big polygon of wooded area, (
Andy Allan wrote:
> One thing needs to be said but doesn't seem to have been done
> properly here: Thanks Eric, that's very generous and much
> appreciated.
Hear hear.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/openmaps.org-tp24058116p24071442.html
Sent from the Op
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Eric Pritchett wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I recently donated openmaps.org to the Open Street Map Foundation.
> Everyone here is doing a great job with this project and I thought you
> could make better use of the domain.
One thing needs to be said but doesn't seem t
I'm working on the LINZ data import, which will bring New Zealand's maps
forward in a huge leap and includes all roads, streets, various features
(parks, airports, streams, riverways etc).
LINZ gave OSM permission over a year ago to import the data, provided
attribution was passed on with the
27 matches
Mail list logo
