On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:47:38 -0400, Joe Pranevich
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to fix Hutchinson Island, Florida (
>
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=27.526&lon=-80.2964&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF)
> and the main issue is that the island's coastlines were very wrong.
(Roads
> off the coast, the co
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to fix Hutchinson Island, Florida (
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=27.526&lon=-80.2964&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF)
> and the main issue is that the island's coastlines were very wrong. (Roads
> off the coast, the coastline at one point crossed over itself as a
> figure-ei
> how do you define "main area"?
> Aren't the shafts vertical access / ventilation shafts that
> lead to the inner mine? IMHO that defines them as
> part of the mine (and indicates that they should be comprised).
The main area is the area where all the bigger buildings of the mine are. An
airshaf
coastline update is slower and may take 1-2 weeks in Mapnik rendering. roads
are updated immediately. TAH should update quickly and you can use it for
checking.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Joe Pranevich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to fix Hutchinson Island, Florida (
> http://www.openstre
2009/10/28 Lesi
> > 2009/10/24 Lesi :
> >
> >> - In the forum somebody has suggested to add a tag for the name of the
> >> mine
> >> the mineshaft belongs to. At first I thought this would be the same as
> >> operator, but actually it is not. So which tag would be appropriate?
> >> mine=...?
> >
2009/10/27 Shaun McDonald
>
> I'm aware of the mapnik-stylesheet, but the question was for the
> cyclemap-stylesheet.
>
>
> The cycle map and nonames stylesheets are not publicly available.
>
> so maybe free cyclemap would be a better name than open? Not that I have
any problem with the styleshee
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
> I was under the impression that anybody with the relevant skills would
> be able to contribute & not just "two"
Maybe we should have a second cyclemap the styles of which are not
determined by "just two" people but by a democratically elected
committee of Wikifid^H^H^H con
> Some questions:
>
> - Do you think it is better to use a namespaced tag (mineshaft:type) or a
> normal tag (mineshaft_type)? In the current proposal the first one is
> used.
> But looking at other features i think that in this case a normal tag would
> be better. It's also bunker_type for exampl
> 2009/10/24 Lesi :
>
>> - In the forum somebody has suggested to add a tag for the name of the
>> mine
>> the mineshaft belongs to. At first I thought this would be the same as
>> operator, but actually it is not. So which tag would be appropriate?
>> mine=...?
>
> to associate the mineshaft to t
On 27 Oct 2009, at 22:03, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/10/24 Shaun McDonald
>> OpenCycleMap is a project by two members of the OSM community
>> (gravitystorm and randomjunk). It's great that people like it and
>> find
>> it useful, and it's a fantastic example of what you can do with OSM
Hello,
I'm trying to fix Hutchinson Island, Florida (
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=27.526&lon=-80.2964&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF)
and the main issue is that the island's coastlines were very wrong. (Roads
off the coast, the coastline at one point crossed over itself as a
figure-eight, etc.) And
Hi,
(me)
>>> Assuming for a moment that my contributions to OSM are copyrightable and
>>> the CC-BY-SA license is valid, then if I license my data CC-BY-SA I have
>>> the right to request anyone using my data, or building or using derived
>>> versions thereof, to provide attribution in the form I
2009/10/25 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Frederik Ramm
> wrote:
> > Assuming for a moment that my contributions to OSM are copyrightable and
> > the CC-BY-SA license is valid, then if I license my data CC-BY-SA I have
> > the right to request anyone using my data, o
2009/10/24 Shaun McDonald
>
> >> OpenCycleMap is a project by two members of the OSM community
> >> (gravitystorm and randomjunk). It's great that people like it and
> >> find
> >> it useful, and it's a fantastic example of what you can do with OSM
> >> besides producing a general purpose map wit
2009/10/21 Tobias Knerr :
> Dave F.:
>>> However, I believe that using a common key instead of
>>> disused/construction/abandoned/...=yes and distinguishing these using
>>> different *values* would have been the better alternative.
>> Common Key? Can you give an example?
>>
>> If you mean status=di
2009/10/24 Lesi :
> - In the forum somebody has suggested to add a tag for the name of the mine
> the mineshaft belongs to. At first I thought this would be the same as
> operator, but actually it is not. So which tag would be appropriate?
> mine=...?
to associate the mineshaft to the mine I'd no
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Robert Schumann
wrote:
> I'm writing on behalf of Software Freedom International, the organisation
> that runs Software Freedom Day (SFD). We currently have a registration
> system for teams taking part in SFD that puts a pin in the map for teams,
> and we'd like t
I guess you need to talk to Bas de Lange from the Dutch SFD chapter.
There was exactly such an application using OpenLayers and OSM tiles
developed by the Dutch OSM community for the SFD event in 2008.
Robert Schumann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing on behalf of Software Freedom Internationa
> Hi to everybody,
>
> we announce that gvSIG Mini has been born. gvSIG Mini is a brand-new
> open-source project (GNU/GPL) aimed at cellular phones. gvSIG Mini is
> a a free viewer of free access maps based on tile services, with WMS
> client, address searching, POIs, routing and more features.
>
El Martes, 27 de Octubre de 2009, Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas escribió:
> I forward this message about a new project we launched at Prodevelop
> that uses intensively osm data, tiles as wel as YOURS and Namefinder.
Been there, done that:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/announce/2009-Octobe
Matt Amos writes:
[CC-BY-SA unclear, or not permissive enough?]
>>>We know for a fact that a number of people (especially people that have
>>>asked their lawyers for an opinion) have indeed decided not to use our
>>>data for this reason.
>>
>>That is certainly a good reason to switch to a simple
I forward this message about a new project we launched at Prodevelop
that uses intensively osm data, tiles as wel as YOURS and Namefinder.
Cheers
-- Forwarded message --
From: Miguel Montesinos
Date: 2009/10/26
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] gvSIG Mini
To: OSGeo Discussions
Hi to e
22 matches
Mail list logo
