Re: [OSM-talk] POI collector

2010-08-14 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
2010/8/14 Paweł Niechoda : > > wikipage: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mobile_POI_collector#Mobile_POI_Collector > Here you can download apk file for android versions (tested on android > 2.1): http://code.google.com/p/osmmobilepoicollector/downloads/list Unfortunately, I get a force close on

[OSM-talk] POI collector

2010-08-14 Thread Paweł Niechoda
Hey guys, I would like to ask you to have a look at my Mobile POI collector. I worked on it during the current Google SOC. Project requires more work and it's going to be develop further. Any comments/feedback is welcome. Project wikipage: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mobile_POI_collector#M

Re: [OSM-talk] Frederik declares war on data imports...

2010-08-14 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/8/10 Jaak Laineste : >> I like this test because it will make things easy. No fuzzy shades of grey >> like >> some Richard is suggesting. Can you give an example of a thing that is done >> by a >> human being and that is not art by this definition? > >  Humans create many non-art things. For

[OSM-talk] Realtime satellite imagery access for OpenStreetMap granted - Russian Fires

2010-08-14 Thread Komяpa
Hi everybody, Due to fires in Russia, ScanEx company have set up live updating stream of satellite imagery from SPOT4 and Landsat satellites. Now, they give OpenStreetMap users access to this stream. What they want in return is mapping of burnt areas with burnt=-MM-DD dates, taken from imager

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Live Ticker

2010-08-14 Thread bernhard zwischenbrugger
hi Whoot, then I can finalize the KHTML interface I'd like to present (and which is 80% ready). There are many changes and the documentation is outdated (all the vector code is new). As I remember you was interested in the distance tool and you wanted to show the lat,lng at mouse position

Re: [OSM-talk] Hypothetical question about objects that will not be relicensed

2010-08-14 Thread TimSC
On 13/08/10 22:48, Nathan Edgars II wrote: So would I be wrong to delete it and replace it with a new way, even if the new one is not as good as the old "tainted" one? I strive for accuracy and completeness in mapping. However, if we are still left between a choice of two data sources, or ne

Re: [OSM-talk] Legal discussion on talk@

2010-08-14 Thread 80n
Please move this discussion to legal-talk. On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Shaun McDonald wrote: > Love your mail Frederik. You've explained it way better than I could. I'm > definitely now in the "meh" camp and would rather a weekly or fortnightly > digest of what has happened on legal talk, ra

Re: [OSM-talk] Flattr donation button

2010-08-14 Thread Dave F.
On 14/08/2010 05:14, Gaz Davidson wrote: On 14 August 2010 00:08, Dave F. > wrote: " When you're registered to flattr, you pay a small monthly fee. You set the amount yourself. In the end of the month, that fee is divided between all the things you fla

Re: [OSM-talk] Hypothetical question about objects that will not be relicensed

2010-08-14 Thread 80n
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > (posted here rather than on legal-talk because it's at its core a > question about editing standards) > Let's say I'm mapping an area and I notice an existing way that I know > will not survive the relicensing process. (Part of the hypoth

Re: [OSM-talk] mountain_pass=yes: combination with place=locality and rendering

2010-08-14 Thread Shalabh
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote: > Hi! > > Our current "default maps" will display mountain_pass=yes only at very high > zoomlevels (z17), although these are often "important geographic features". > Especially road maps will usually display passes even more prominently than > su

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Live Ticker

2010-08-14 Thread Frank Heinen
Whoot, then I can finalize the KHTML interface I'd like to present (and which is 80% ready). Thanks Bernhard Fri, 2010-08-13 at 20:53 +0200, Igor Brejc wrote: > Nice! > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:39 PM, bernhard zwischenbrugger > wrote: > Hi all > > I made an OSM Live

Re: [OSM-talk] Legal discussion on talk@

2010-08-14 Thread Shaun McDonald
Love your mail Frederik. You've explained it way better than I could. I'm definitely now in the "meh" camp and would rather a weekly or fortnightly digest of what has happened on legal talk, rather than all the discussion spilling over from legal talk. Thus getting the best of both worlds of bei