80n wrote:
Please move this discussion to legal-talk.
BUT ... the discussion on adding a weekly summary of legal-talk HERE should
happen HERE. I can't be bothered with all of the back biting, but a sensible
coverage of the salient point DOES make sense and one post a week ... which
other int
2010/8/11 SteveC :
> Specifically, I point to the basics of mailing list etiquette:
...
> • No conspiracy theories
...
could this be amended by "unless there is a real conspiracy"?
Otherwise our hands might be tied in case there is a conspiracy.
cheers,
Martin
M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >• No conspiracy theories
> ...
>
> could this be amended by "unless there is a real conspiracy"?
> Otherwise our hands might be tied in case there is a conspiracy.
"no conspiracy theories" seems clear.
A real conspiracy is not a theory. "conspiracy theorie
Yes force close here as welll on HTC Desire 2.2
2010/8/15 Jeffrey Ollie :
> 2010/8/14 Paweł Niechoda :
>>
>> wikipage: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mobile_POI_collector#Mobile_POI_Collector
>> Here you can download apk file for android versions (tested on android
>> 2.1): http://code.google.
Works on my HTC Magic with Cyanogen 4.2, but it's quite slow and keeps
refreshing the map. There are some replacements for MapView that are using
OSM, did you tried them?
--Ciprian
On Aug 15, 2010 2:56 PM, "Patrick Weber" wrote:
Yes force close here as welll on HTC Desire 2.2
2010/8/15 Jeffrey
However, should someone uncover a real conspiracy, any attempt to reveal it to
others would be discussion of a conspiracy theory, and therefore forbidden.
"Theory" does not mean "nonexistent"; the fact that the theory of gravity
exists does not mean that gravity does not exist.
--
John F. Eld
Hi!
For a long time now I am interested in tagging seamarks.(short version)
Now I found out that there are two comparable but different and competing
tagging schemes:
* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/marine-tagging
* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lights_Data_Model
there are many empty nodes in the osm database.
In the IRC channel i was told, that there are users who paint
empty nodes in the map to mark things like
"road is not mapped, but continues here"
Is there already a decision about dealing with empty nodes?
I think we should discuss that on this lis
Hello
Le dimanche 15 août 2010 à 23:42, Jonas Stein a écrit :
> Validators claim empty nodes are defective, but are they right?
> Is painting with empty nodes data that we want to have in the database?
> Are there any empty nodes that make sense, or is a empty always node
> nonsense?
I'd say the v
Yeah, I would tend to agree that empty nodes should be regarded as
errors. That is how I spotted a problematic changeset the other day
that really needed reverting. I know OSM emphasizes distributed
tagging/usage but an empty node has absolutely no value to anyone
except (maybe) the person who crea
On 16 August 2010 07:42, Jonas Stein wrote:
> Are there any empty nodes that make sense, or is a empty always node nonsense?
The only thing I can think of , is that when I upload a way, the nodes
go first, then the way joins them all up. Is it possible for somebody
else to get the data while I'm
2010/8/16 Renaud MICHEL :
>> Are there any empty nodes that make sense, or is a empty always node
>> nonsense?
>
> I'd say the validators are right, because a node that is neither part of a
> way, nor part of a relation, and has no tags is simply useless: we have no
> idea why it sits there.
+1,
Renaud MICHEL-2 wrote:
>
> Hello
> Le dimanche 15 août 2010 à 23:42, Jonas Stein a écrit :
>> Validators claim empty nodes are defective, but are they right?
>> Is painting with empty nodes data that we want to have in the database?
>> Are there any empty nodes that make sense, or is a empty alw
On Mon, 16 August, 2010 9:36:50 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> There's still such a bug: http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2700
This often happens to me in Potlatch. Here's my usual use case. An intersection
of two streets needs to be converted to a roundabout.
1. Split each street at the in
On 16-8-2010 1:41, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
+1, at least if they are older than some days/weeks. If someone is
doing a very big upload it might be (dependant on the way he
structures the upload) that he is first uploading nodes and only later
the ways. That's why I wouldn't delete recently cre
Thanks for the update and all the hard work.
Steve
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Andy Allan wrote:
> Yeah, the existing server is pretty much kaput - it's completely
> overloaded. Many parts of the map haven't been re-rendered since the
> start of July. It's been in a sorry state for a few mo
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Jonas Stein wrote:
> there are many empty nodes in the osm database.
>
> In the IRC channel i was told, that there are users who paint
> empty nodes in the map to mark things like
> "road is not mapped, but continues here"
Personally, I delete them. If people want
Hi,
Jonas Stein wrote:
In the IRC channel i was told, that there are users who paint
empty nodes in the map to mark things like
"road is not mapped, but continues here"
I do this occasionally, and I'm sure I haven't made this up but got the
practice from someone/somewhere else - when a way is
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
> Maybe most of those empty nodes are remnants from some time ago, when some
> editors would delete a way, but not the nodes it contained (I think there
> used to be such a bug, even before I started contributing to OSM).
Empty nodes can also
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:19:42 +0200, Frederik Ramm
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jonas Stein wrote:
>> In the IRC channel i was told, that there are users who paint
>> empty nodes in the map to mark things like
>> "road is not mapped, but continues here"
>
> I do this occasionally, and I'm sure I haven't made
20 matches
Mail list logo
