On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Chris Browet wrote:
> You realize "tightly moderate" and "issues of all nature" are somewhat
> contradictory, do you?
Not at all. Personal attacks, repetition, off-topic remarks,
spamminess, me-tooism - none of this comes under "issues of all
natures". Picture the
2010/8/24 Konrad Skeri :
> Is there any current usage of super-relations for roads?
> This could be resolved by making a relation of E 45 Sorsele
> municipality, E 45 Storuman municipality, E 45 Vilhelmina
> municipality, etc. and then join all of them in the super-relation E
> 45 Sweden, and fin
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Personally I use 'save mode' in P1 with the approach "save early, save
> (very) often". Once you've made your first save (with changeset comment)
> it's only a matter of pressing 'S' now and then, which'll bring up a
> progress dialogue f
Is there any current usage of super-relations for roads?
Super-relations have come into wider use in the US on national road
networks.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Interstate_Highway_relations
Minimizing conflicts across huge geographic areas was one of the tipping
points in favor
I'm beginning to edit/encode/upload the session videos from SotM.us 2010
http://vimeo.com/channels/128913
I'm tweeting each upload to #sotmus. Takes a few hours to edit/upload each
session so expect two or three per day.
___
talk mailing list
talk
Is there any current usage of super-relations for roads?
A few months ago I edited the E 45 (and hence its relation) in
northern Sweden and when uploading the changes got a conflict since
someone else had changed the E 45 after I started editing. (Somewhere
in Italy.) So I resolved the conflict an
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Martin Fossdal Guttesen
wrote:
> Am i wrong or wasin't there a plug-in for josom to get user statistics
> for selected nodes ?
> i can't seem to find it now ???
>
> if i am wrong i would like a plug-in that tells me the precentage a user has
> contributed for the s
Am i wrong or wasin't there a plug-in for josom to get user statistics for
selected nodes ?
i can't seem to find it now ???
if i am wrong i would like a plug-in that tells me the precentage a user has
contributed for the selected bbox in josom
just so i can finde out how mutch contribution i ha
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
>
> There are a lot of things that could be added to a changeset. For
> instance, a useful changeset comment is a simple and obvious way to
> cooperate with other mappers.
>
> http://ow.ly/2u0IQ
>
>
This this ? http://www.openstreetmap.org/br
Apologies to legal-talk, it would have helped if I had quoted the original
proposal that started the thread
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:17 AM, ce-test wrote:
> A fork as stipulated should not be necessarily about a group of people
> leaving OSM , but about we (OSM) deciding to continue in two or m
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:12 +0200, "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen" wrote:
> The history problem happens also when all contributors that are not happy
> with the new ODBL license will withdraw their data.
Yes, but the hideousness of the history problem will only happen once,
and be d
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:33 AM, John Smith wrote:
> On 24 August 2010 15:58, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
> wrote:
>> This would require the OSM database to include a extra field for each and
>> every item indicating the license
>
> You could just add the license information as
> veg...@engen.priv.no wrote on 24.08.2010 11:19:02:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:41:32AM +0200, Sverre Didriksen wrote:
> > >
> > > Det kan godt være du har rett. Ville bare nevne det siden de sa de
> fikk en
> > > del data fra traffikanten. Jeg ser på nettsiden at de bare dekker det
>
I wanted to revive the discussion inspired by NearMap, regarding making an
easier way to on-ramp new users, since it seemed to have died.
Nick wrote:
So let's bring this back to people who want to create tools to make it
easier for everyone to participate in OSM. How can we get past the
problems
Steve Bennett wrote:
> I note someone below saying Potlatch 2 will only have the offline
> mode. Ugh. That's a real pity.
Live mode is more complex to code (and, hence, a potential source of bugs)
by an order of magnitude. Stuff like merging ways and undo is incredibly
convoluted in P1 because of
On 24 August 2010 17:11, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
wrote:
>>You could just add the license information as part of the changeset tags,
>>that way there is no changes to OSMs DB needed.
>
> But then, during an extract, the changeset database will have to be used... I
> don't kno
vegard wrote:
>Well. Then I come along, add an amenity=cafe, under a CCBYSA2.0-license. But
>at the wrong spot. And you, having chosen an OdBL-license, decides to move it
>to the correct position. Under what license is that node?
>This isn't going to be easy, hardly possible? :)
I did not say i
17 matches
Mail list logo
