if(lat > 85 || lat < -85)
{
do_not_render();
}
(and yep, something went wrong with my emails...)
2010/11/13 Peter :
> oops, yes...
>
> 2010/11/13 Nathan Edgars II :
>> Did you mean to send this to the list?
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Peter wrote:
>>> Oops, must be:
>>> if(la
Nakor Osm wrote:
>
> Did the South Pole move?
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0&lon=0&zoom=17&layers=M
>
> More seriously there is no data there and I am wondering why it displays
> "South Pole"
>
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/436012592
Remember that the Mercator projection c
Am 12.11.2010 um 22:34 schrieb Simone Cortesi :
> 2010/11/12 Matthias Meißer :
>> a new week, a new Community updates Newsletter by EMerzh is out:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_Updates/2010-11-01
>>
>> By the way, he needs further helpers to monitor all the channels :)
>
> th
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 10:54 +, Ed Avis wrote:
> David Murn incanberra.com.au> writes:
>
> >From looking at a few different cities in this map, it is quite telling
> >what areas support the licence and which areas will be devastated by the
> >data loss.
>
> Please. _Would_ be devastated by d
OH NO!!! It has started! We're all gonna DIE11!!!
Nakor wrote:
> Did the South Pole move?
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0&lon=0&zoom=17&layers=M
>
> More seriously there is no data there and I am wondering why it displays
> "South Pole"
>
> Thanks,
>
> N.
>
>
I didn't had time this week to contact him, but I sent a message a few
minutes ago.
I'll wait for the answer before to proceed with the revert.
Vitor
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:25 AM, vitor wrote:
> > It seems to be a new user from Brazil tr
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:25 AM, vitor wrote:
> It seems to be a new user from Brazil trying to upload a .dwg without much
> knowledge. I´ll try to contact him.
Did you find out anything? I see the changeset hasn't been reverted yet
Toby
___
talk maili
I guess is created from the position of north pole...
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Nakor wrote:
> Did the South Pole move?
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0&lon=0&zoom=17&layers=M
>
> More seriously there is no data there and I am wondering why it displays
> "South Pole"
>
> Thanks,
>
>
2010/11/12 Matthias Meißer :
> a new week, a new Community updates Newsletter by EMerzh is out:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_Updates/2010-11-01
>
> By the way, he needs further helpers to monitor all the channels :)
thanks! It is a long desired "feature" of OSM... :)
--
-S
___
Did the South Pole move?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0&lon=0&zoom=17&layers=M
More seriously there is no data there and I am wondering why it displays
"South Pole"
Thanks,
N.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstre
The problem is, and therefore it's not possible to get a good solution
without changing the database layout: history information apply to
attributes, not to objects, but tags only apply to to objects as a whole.
That's also a problem at some other issues discussed repeatingly, e.g.
different o
On 12 November 2010 12:28, Peter Wendorff wrote:
> start_date, as you see in this example, is a generic tag, like e.g. width is.
> Refinements like start_date:construction, start_date:usage;
> start_date:planning; start_date:disusage; start_date:abandonment are possible
> - but start_date should
Hi Fabian,
Thanks for creating this good visualization of ways affected by the
acceptance of ODbL + CT.
May I make a suggestion? It seems that only roads are being marked.
How about all the other ways like landuses, boundaries, riverbanks,
and others? I think you can create a really simple Mapnik
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Fabian Schmidt
wrote:
>
> Am 11.11.10 schrieb Anthony:
>
>> What exactly does it mean for a way to be "created and edited only by
>> people who did accept the ODBL"? Specifically, are you looking at the
>> underlying nodes, or not?
>
> At the moment I'm only looki
That is great keep it up! And consider posting to OpenGeoData.org
== Mikel Maron ==
+254(0)724899738 @mikel s:mikelmaron
http://mapkibera.org/
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Haiti
From: Matthias Meißer
To: OpenStreetMap Talk
Sent: Fri, November
On 12 November 2010 22:47, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/12/10 13:04, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>>
>> If we go by what the JOSM introduction page says ("OpenStreetMap is
>> changing
>> its license"), "will" is correct.
>
> Please stop this immediately.
“Methinks He Doth Protest Too Loudly”
Hi,
On 11/12/10 13:04, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
If we go by what the JOSM introduction page says ("OpenStreetMap is changing
its license"), "will" is correct.
Please stop this immediately.
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
ht
> Ed Avis wrote:
>> Please. _Would_ be devastated by data loss, if someone decided to delete
>> all
>> that data.
Noone decideto "delete all that data", in fact, we are still in phase
2 of the migration, and the data deletion will come up in phase 5...
so we stillhave plenny of time to talk to peo
Ed Avis wrote:
>
> David Murn incanberra.com.au> writes:
>
>>From looking at a few different cities in this map, it is quite telling
>>what areas support the licence and which areas will be devastated by the
>>data loss.
>
> Please. _Would_ be devastated by data loss, if someone decided to d
Am 12.11.2010 12:00, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
2010/11/11:
It would be more logical to have the date construction started be start_date,
and the date construction completed be completed_date. Having the completion
date tagged as start_date doesn't make sense.
I disagree, because start_dat
On 12 Nov 2010, at 11:57, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/11/11 Laurence Penney :
>> On 11 Nov 2010, at 20:30, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>> IMHO the wiki is clear here: "start_date is the date the construction
>>> of feature finished." It is not about the construction being
>>> commissioned o
2010/11/12 Andrew Errington :
> At the moment there is are 'temporary' tags to record this:
>
> construction_start_date=2003-05-09
> construction_end_date=2004-12-09
IMHO those are fine. If you use them regularly might be worth to
document them as feature in the wiki so that others use them as w
2010/11/11 :
> It would be more logical to have the date construction started be start_date,
> and the date construction completed be completed_date. Having the completion
> date tagged as start_date doesn't make sense.
I disagree, because start_date is the beginning of the tagged feature,
th
2010/11/11 Laurence Penney :
> On 11 Nov 2010, at 20:30, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> IMHO the wiki is clear here: "start_date is the date the construction
>> of feature finished." It is not about the construction being
>> commissioned or started.
>
> The wiki may be clear but that doesn't mean i
David Murn incanberra.com.au> writes:
>From looking at a few different cities in this map, it is quite telling
>what areas support the licence and which areas will be devastated by the
>data loss.
Please. _Would_ be devastated by data loss, if someone decided to delete all
that data.
--
Ed Av
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:01:40 +0100
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/12/10 02:37, David Murn wrote:
> > From looking at a few different cities in this map, it is quite
> > telling what areas support the licence and which areas will be
> > devastated by the data loss.
>
> Everyone please keep
Andrew Errington wrote:
It would be more logical to have the date construction started be
> start_date, and the date construction completed be completed_date.
> Having the completion date tagged as start_date doesn't make sense.
I agree. We have this 'opportunity' in Korea to record the start
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:45 AM, David Murn wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 22:52 +0100, Mike Dupont wrote:
>
> > Are the sheets with the gas stations from austraila imported yet? we
> > can use that as the test data.
>
> Assuming you mean fuel stations, and not gas stations, then yes a lot
> have
Am 11.11.10 schrieb Anthony:
What exactly does it mean for a way to be "created and edited only by
people who did accept the ODBL"? Specifically, are you looking at the
underlying nodes, or not?
At the moment I'm only looking at the ways as it is visible in the API
history. So an edit consi
29 matches
Mail list logo
