[OSM-talk] Bing aerial imagery analyzer - date range (Dec/2000-Jun/2006)

2010-12-14 Thread dies38061
Martijn, I'm looking at imagery over Cali, Colombia and see a date displayed as "Dec/2000-Jun/2006". This seems quite a large range; could you explain how we should interpret this date information? Thanks. ceyockey http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ceyockey > 7. Re: new version of Bi

Re: [OSM-talk] new version of Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool

2010-12-14 Thread dies38061
Martijn, I've added a page to the Wiki which describes the software with an instance of the Software2 template; see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_imagery_analyzer_for_OSM . I think this provides information that I've always wanted for aerial imagery but have never had consistently at

Re: [OSM-talk] [HOT] Colombia: Give me a map, we need it to save lives! / Dame un mapa ¡ lo nec esitamos para salvar Vidas!

2010-12-14 Thread ouɐɯnH
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Steve Coast wrote: > Pulling in Marcelo. > > Marcelo, you have to deal with the 'community' now, not me :-) > > Steve > > stevecoast.com > > On Dec 14, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Richard Weait wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Fredy and Floris have had a recent conversation that

Re: [OSM-talk] Could someone revert these Changesets please.

2010-12-14 Thread Dave F.
On 12/12/2010 19:08, malenki wrote: I reverted the changesets beginning with the newest one. Unfortunately I did only look at the hour of creation, not at the day. I hope I didn't mess up something. After reverting i split this monster relation containing 1.5k elements with 800+(!) versions into

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

2010-12-14 Thread Emilie Laffray
On 14 December 2010 16:10, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer wrote: > Hi,, > > > NB: we've been asked to suggest changes to the CT's if we think they > > are unclear. I cannot remember whether you caught that. > > Where should these suggestions be made? > > My last suggested change, posted to this list, rec

Re: [OSM-talk] new version of Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool

2010-12-14 Thread Vincent Pottier
Le 14/12/2010 16:42, Martijn van Exel a écrit : The BBOX is available through the Bing API, could be added easily. Martijn I've added it on the mapJumper. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MapJumper But there is a bug. The zoom parameter key is 'z' not 'zoom' as on openLayers compatibles site

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

2010-12-14 Thread Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer
Hi,, > NB: we've been asked to suggest changes to the CT's if we think they > are unclear. I cannot remember whether you caught that. Where should these suggestions be made? My last suggested change, posted to this list, received no response at all from the licensing working group. (The proble

Re: [OSM-talk] new version of Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool

2010-12-14 Thread Martijn van Exel
The BBOX is available through the Bing API, could be added easily. Martijn Martijn van Exel +++...@rtijn.org laziness – impatience – hubris http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl | http://oegeo.wordpress.com/ twitter / skype: mvexel flickr: rhodes On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:34 PM, S

Re: [OSM-talk] new version of Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool

2010-12-14 Thread S.Higashi
Thanks for your quick reply. > by position, do you mean the coordinates? They are available through > the permalink option. I wanted to get boundary box or something like that at a glance. But, the coordinates in the URL would be enough. Thank you I'll note them. Although this is not main topic

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

2010-12-14 Thread Francis Davey
On 14 December 2010 14:08, Anthony wrote: > > Right, well, I thought someone was going to respond with "of course > it's not 2/3 of all active contributors", so you've certainly > confirmed to me that this is unclear, as in can be interpreted by > non-lawyers in differing ways. I'm afraid I'm not

Re: [OSM-talk] new version of Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool

2010-12-14 Thread Martijn van Exel
by position, do you mean the coordinates? They are available through the permalink option. As for the tile ID, you can find that out by right-clicking the appropriate tile and selecting something like 'image properties' or 'image info' from the context menu. The value behind '?t=" is the tile quadk

Re: [OSM-talk] new version of Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool

2010-12-14 Thread S.Higashi
Thanks for your tool and this new feature. Also something like the position or ID of each tile would be appriciated, if shown on the screen. I'd like to note where I adjusted the offset of background imagery. > Thanks for this tool, it's really helpful in Romania. > > --Ciprian > > On Tue, Dec 14,

Re: [OSM-talk] new version of Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool

2010-12-14 Thread Ciprian Talaba
Thanks for this tool, it's really helpful in Romania. --Ciprian On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi all, > > I just replaced the Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool with a new version. > > http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/ > >

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

2010-12-14 Thread Anthony
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Francis Davey wrote: > On 13 December 2010 22:46, Anthony wrote: >> It's unclear to me whether a 2/3 majority of active contributors have >> to vote "yes", or merely 2/3 of some unspecified quorum of active >> contributors. >> > > It is extremely unlikely that any

Re: [OSM-talk] new version of Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool

2010-12-14 Thread Steve Bennett
Nifty - that's really interesting information I wouldn't have thought of asking for. Steve On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi all, > > I just replaced the Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool with a new version. > > http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/ > > It now al

[OSM-talk] new version of Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool

2010-12-14 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi all, I just replaced the Bing aerial imagery analyzer tool with a new version. http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/ It now also visualizes the remaining zoom depth. This means that you can see how many zoom levels worth of imagery there is below your current tile, without having to zoom

Re: [OSM-talk] Nanomaps

2010-12-14 Thread Stella Laurenzo
Frederik, Thanks for the feedback. There are in fact a couple of implementations that are doing similar things, including Tile5 and khtml.org. At this early stage of OSS development along these fronts, it is my opinion that it doesn't hurt to have a fair bit of overlap. We'll learn from each oth