It's running fine.
There are a large volume of requests, the server is fully loaded, your
requests may timeout.
More hardware would help.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> It seems to be having the same problem again. Is there a better place
> to report it than spammin
It's a monthly thing ...in OSM land
lol .. smooth :)
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Anthony wrote:
> > The wiki is confusing, though. It puts highway=residential,
> > highway=track, highway=service, and highway=pedestrian under the
> > su
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Anthony wrote:
> The wiki is confusing, though. It puts highway=residential,
> highway=track, highway=service, and highway=pedestrian under the
> subcategory of "roads", but it puts highway=cycleway, highway=footway,
> and highway=bridleway under the subcategory
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:59 PM, David Murn wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:39 -0500, Anthony wrote:
>
>> > So, while 'road' may mean a tarred bit of bitumen in the UK, and it
>> > means something passable by a vehicle in Australia, in the OSM context
>> > it means an unknown classification, tem
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:39 -0500, Anthony wrote:
> > So, while 'road' may mean a tarred bit of bitumen in the UK, and it
> > means something passable by a vehicle in Australia, in the OSM context
> > it means an unknown classification, temporarily tagged until the
> > required re-survey is comple
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:54 PM, David Murn wrote:>
> Well, I dunno/care about what the definition is in every state, but the
> definition of highway=road in the OSM wiki (since I believe we're all
> talking about OSM here, and not some other localised schema):
>
> >From highway=road:
>> A road of
It seems to be having the same problem again. Is there a better place
to report it than spamming this list?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2011/1/11 Anthony :
> The more important question is what the tag means. Or is highway=road
> a tag which has a different definition in every state?
highway=road is a way that seemed to be OK for travelling in an aerial
photo, it can be all kinds of OSM-highways.
cheers,
Martin
___
2011/1/11 Pieren :
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:04 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>>
>> will be unpaved: there is cobblestone, surface=asphalt,
>>
>
> Excuse the stupidity of my question, but what is the difference between
> 'paved' and 'asphalt' ?
it's different concepts: paved doesn't tell yo
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 23:01 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Murn wrote:
> > Now, maybe Im off the mark here, but it
> > sounds like that is *EXACTLY* the outcome we want when mass changing
> > tags,
>
> We are not going to mass-change tags.
'we' being who? Are you speaking on behal
On 12 January 2011 08:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Murn wrote:
>>
>> Now, maybe Im off the mark here, but it
>> sounds like that is *EXACTLY* the outcome we want when mass changing
>> tags,
>
> We are not going to mass-change tags.
If the reason is good enough, eg the flow control thr
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
Now, maybe Im off the mark here, but it
sounds like that is *EXACTLY* the outcome we want when mass changing
tags,
We are not going to mass-change tags.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
__
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 10:13 -0500, Anthony wrote:
> > Sure, but if you read you will notice that I was specifically answering
> > a question about what that would be called in the UK, not what it would
> > be called in Australia.
>
> The more important question is what the tag means. Or is highwa
FWIW I've now replaced several occurrences of highway=unsurfaced in the UK
(thanks to Steve's very timely rendering), starting in areas I know
personally (West Oxfordshire and Rutland), and not a single one would be
described as a road in the UK.
I added some several years ago. I've changed some
On 12 January 2011 05:46, wrote:
> Nashville, Tennessee, USA, where I live, was hit by severe flooding on May 1
> and May 2, 2010, and not only had roads wash out, but some railway tracks as
> well. The flood was later classified as a thousand-year flood (meaning, not
> likely to occur more t
My home address is at a highway=track going to access=private a little
further on:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.633745&lon=5.301177&zoom=18&layers=M
On Aruba, my other area of mapping, I also use tracktype=grade1
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=12.48251&lon=-69.9788&zoom=16&layers=M
(
Nashville, Tennessee, USA, where I live, was hit by severe flooding on May 1
and May 2, 2010, and not only had roads wash out, but some railway tracks as
well. The flood was later classified as a thousand-year flood (meaning, not
likely to occur more than once in a thousand years).
---Orig
> http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/floodrelief/gallery-fn7ik2te-1225983067381?page=90
Here's another example:
http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/floodrelief/gallery-fn7ik2te-1225983067381?page=117
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
On 10/01/2011 18:52, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
A cursory glance suggests Britain appears to have more highway=unsurfaced
than other places, and even then there aren't that many. I will happily fix
200 of them _properly_ (i.e. with what the track actually is, not the
cop-out of highway=road) if so
On 11/01/2011 17:57, DavidD wrote:
The mapnik layer already renders highway=track;surfaced=paved as a
solid line and highway=track;surface=unpaved as a dashed line.
An example
http://osm.org/go/eutNf8ah--
That is rendering the different tracktype tags (grade1/grade2 etc), not
the surface tag
On 11 January 2011 17:06, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Try playing with Maperitive, or Osmarender, or Mapnik, or Halcyon, or
> whatever, to have a go at rendering it yourself. Keep playing until you've
> got something that looks simple, intuitive and neat. When you've got this
> really great renderi
A common settlement pattern in the USA, in rural communities that have mostly
or entirely developed since the invention of the automobile, is to have houses
and small businesses strung out along a highway. You end up with a community
that can be several miles long, and yet only a hundred feet o
On 12 January 2011 03:25, wrote:
> Is there a tag for marking a section of road as deteriorated, rutted or
> washed out? There needs to be a range of values, as the severity can range
> from merely requiring you to slow down, to rendering the road completely
> impassable (as when a flood resu
2011/1/11 Stephen Hope :
> 2011/1/10 ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) :
>> I used hamlet for my block as pop limit of <1000 is given = satisfied
>
> The problem here is that population is only part of the definition of
> a hamlet. Less than 1000 people is correct, but it also has an
> implied "and is surro
Is there a tag for marking a section of road as deteriorated, rutted or washed
out? There needs to be a range of values, as the severity can range from
merely requiring you to slow down, to rendering the road completely impassable
(as when a flood results in a washout several meters deep, with
This convention of using a dotted line to indicate an unsurfaced road is also
standard practice in the USA.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved
>From :mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
Date :Tue Jan 11 10:40:49 America/Chicago 2011
On 11 January 2011 23:51, Ric
On 12 January 2011 03:04, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> yes, I agree that it would be nice to have a different rendering for
> roads based on their surface. This is not completely trivial though:
> there is also another tag regarding the surface: smoothness. Somehow
Except you could quite easily t
Asztalos Attila wrote:
> On 11-Jan-2011 15:51, Richard Mann wrote:
>> Which is not to say that knowing which roads are cobbled
>> wouldn't be handy sometimes (but I probably think of this
>> as something you need to render for yourself (cue ad for
>> Maperitive...))
>
> I certainly see the meri
2011/1/11 John Smith :
> There is a lot of public unsurfaced roads in Australia, some are
> graveled, some are black soil and you don't both using them in the wet
> without a 4wd etc.
>
> These usually show on maps as dashed lines, rather than solid lines,
> rather than messing with the colour.
y
On 11 January 2011 23:51, Richard Mann
wrote:
> Is it public access, or is it owned privately? I ask because there is
> a strong correlation between public roads and decent maintenance where
> I come from. And as it happens, Mapnik does show access=private.
>
> (the general problem with rendering
On 11-Jan-2011 15:51, Richard Mann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Asztalos Attila
wrote:
As far as I can tell neither the mapnik nor the osmarender basemap displays
surface information/modifiers (ie. if a tag like surface=unpaved or similar
is present).
Is it public access, or is it
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 11/01/11 11:05, David Murn wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 19:47 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
>>> On 10/01/11 19:00, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
>>>
American usage would be to refer to that as a road, just not a very
high-quality road.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Asztalos Attila
wrote:
> As far as I can tell neither the mapnik nor the osmarender basemap displays
> surface information/modifiers (ie. if a tag like surface=unpaved or similar
> is present).
Is it public access, or is it owned privately? I ask because there is
Hi all
As far as I can tell neither the mapnik nor the osmarender basemap
displays surface information/modifiers (ie. if a tag like
surface=unpaved or similar is present). Now I can definitely see how
this is not an issue in large parts of the world, urban roads just being
paved (as they are
On 11/01/11 11:05, David Murn wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 19:47 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> On 10/01/11 19:00, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
>>
>>> American usage would be to refer to that as a road, just not a very
>>> high-quality road. I take it that, in Britain, there are certain minimum
>>>
David Murn wrote:
> Crikey, dont let them see the Old Eyre Highway across southern
> Australia, or the Outback Highway[1] across Central Australia.
> Together over 3000km of highly travelled road, connecting the
> western coast of the country to the central/eastern regions.
Just goes to show the
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 19:47 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 10/01/11 19:00, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
>
> > American usage would be to refer to that as a road, just not a very
> > high-quality road. I take it that, in Britain, there are certain minimum
> > standards for being called a road?
>
>
Hello,
I have tagged the following suburb:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1038274011
Nominatim doesn't restrict it to the admin_level 8 in which the node
is situated:
http://open.mapquestapi.com/nominatim/v1/details.php?place_id=127750725
To fix this, I have tried adding an is_in tag w
Serious about changing highway=unsurfaced?
In response to Richard's suggestion I have rendered where they occur in England:
http://steve8.dev.openstreetmap.org/unsurfacedENG.png
I am currently rendering a tile set (down to about z10) to help identify exact
locations.
These will be uploaded to a se
39 matches
Mail list logo
