Jukka Rahkonen-2 wrote:
>
> Have the statistics stopped? The title of the page seems to be
> OpenStreetMap stats report run at Fri Sep 09 00:00:12 +0100 2011
>
The stats are made for a different purpose, but they may help you until the
osm stats are back
http://odbl.de/daily/
--
View this mess
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Jukka Rahkonen
wrote:
> Have the statistics stopped? The title of the page seems to be
> OpenStreetMap stats report run at Fri Sep 09 00:00:12 +0100 2011
Yes. The sys admin team knows about this. Give them a couple of days
to sort it out.
__
Have the statistics stopped? The title of the page seems to be
OpenStreetMap stats report run at Fri Sep 09 00:00:12 +0100 2011
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Gregory wrote:
> How would the reviewer be selected?
Why do you need to "select" a reviewer?
The OWL-powered changeset listing could highlight those changesets where
review has been requested. Experienced mappers browsing the recent changes
(as experienced mappers do) would see these, and contact
On 27 September 2011 12:36, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Tim Waters (chippy) wrote:
> > I also think that a voluntary opt-in review system would work - and
> > only really needs someone to write one, and a JOSM plugin, and a
> > Potlatch 2 patch.
>
> I'll very happily patch P2, assuming the "please
Tim Waters (chippy) wrote:
> I also think that a voluntary opt-in review system would work - and
> only really needs someone to write one, and a JOSM plugin, and a
> Potlatch 2 patch.
I'll very happily patch P2, assuming the "please review" functionality can
be built into the core Rails site. (O
I also think that a voluntary opt-in review system would work - and only
really needs someone to write one, and a JOSM plugin, and a Potlatch 2
patch. It's on my list of things to do, but I doubt I will ever get around
to doing it. But that's all that needs happen by someone - do-ocracy etc...
In
7 matches
Mail list logo
