Hi all,
I'm running TileMill on an 8 core Ubuntu VM with 32GB of memory, on an
OpenStack cloud. Recently, my VM was destroyed, and I rebuilt it
(identically, I thought) on slightly different hardware (same cloud, but
different physical infrastructure).
The new build is much slower at rendering -
> From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk]
> Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 2:00 AM
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Making iD the default editor on osm.org
>
> Case 3 ... vandalism creating havoc ... this can only be correctly
> handled by reverting the change set ...
Hi
On trac.osm.org you can still find mapnik as component.
I wonder:
* is it still needed
* did the tickets get evaluated when developing the carto style
* is the new code checked against these reports/requests
As there are still tickets filled they are probably against carto.
cu
colliar
si
Am 24.08.2013 11:00, schrieb Lester Caine:
> Case 1 ... better imagery shows that the location of a way is wrong ...
> so move the way to the new location! Do not delete the way and and start
> again from scratch. This is were 'imports' are very badly broken, and
> when a new import is applied it s
Il giorno 24/ago/2013, alle ore 16:04, "John F. Eldredge"
ha scritto:
> So, how would you classify a one-lane "road" leading through a former field,
> now overgrown with 30 years or so of bushes and saplings, leading to a
> billboard adjoining a motorway?
service
cheers,
Martin
__
So, how would you classify a one-lane "road" leading through a former field,
now overgrown with 30 years or so of bushes and saplings, leading to a
billboard adjoining a motorway? The only improvements the "road" receives is to
be mowed periodically to keep it passable, and its only use is by cr
Il giorno 24/ago/2013, alle ore 15:11, colliar ha
scritto:
> Sorry, but how do you get the hint that it is a track and not an
> unclassified highway and you are not allowed to use it without sign ?
yes, this remains a miracle for me as well, but it seems to be the legal
situation. Fortunate
Am 24.08.2013 01:42, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> Il giorno 23/ago/2013, alle ore 16:52, Pieren ha scritto:
>
>> BTW I just discover that some people are tagging for routing (after
>> "tagging for the renderer"). They add "access=yes" or
>> "motor_vehicle=yes" to open the routable track in OSRM
Ross Scanlon wrote:
Notice the broken casing on the sides of some of the roads.
If what you are talking about is the change in style on the roads to the
right, then how were they generated as they do not appear on the main
database? It's nice to see I can just cut and paste the old style
locatio
SomeoneElse wrote:
1) A POI added without a main tag
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/4295739963
I suspect that people are adding a "point" to a map (in this case for a shop),
and are not seeing "shop" in the default list to the left or understanding that
they can search. In my e
On 24/08/13 19:39, Lester Caine wrote:
Ross Scanlon wrote:
Notice the broken casing on the sides of some of the roads.
If what you are talking about is the change in style on the roads to the
right, then how were they generated as they do not appear on the main
database? It's nice to see I can
John Firebaugh wrote:
During the last month in this area:
P2 iD JOSM Other (Wheelmap / Go Map! / POI+)
Made no newbie errors34 17 3 3
Made at least one newbie error 40 16 1 3
Made more serious errors 5 0 1 0
So 45 of 79 new con
Ross Scanlon wrote:
Notice the broken casing on the sides of some of the roads.
If what you are talking about is the change in style on the roads to the
right, then how were they generated as they do not appear on the main
database? It's nice to see I can just cut and paste the old style
locatio
Colin Smale wrote:
What about when an object (perhaps a road or a boundary) is replaced by a better
approximation? The history of the database objects is already dealt with (you
can access old versions and see when it was deleted). Typically in these cases
the new version gets drawn/uploaded, the
On 24/08/13 17:46, Lester Caine wrote:
Notice the broken casing on the sides of some of the roads.
If what you are talking about is the change in style on the roads to the
right, then how were they generated as they do not appear on the main
database? It's nice to see I can just cut and paste
Florian Lohoff wrote:
ANY road should be used for routing - track/service do have an
implicit access=destination and should not used for "through" traffic
but have no route restrictions otherwise
That may be the case where you live but I wouldn't make that assumption
worldwide. I certainly w
What about when an object (perhaps a road or a boundary) is replaced by
a better approximation? The history of the database objects is already
dealt with (you can access old versions and see when it was deleted).
Typically in these cases the new version gets drawn/uploaded, the tags
are copied ov
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Sometimes it almost looks like some people here are afraid of new users.
+1
We also have to see "deletions" as positive contributions "a priori"
when it is really fixing something (e.g. removing an obsolete POI).
Only intentional deletions are positive c
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Pieren wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Ben Abelshausen
> wrote:
> > Sometimes it almost looks like some people here are afraid of new users.
>
> +1
> We also have to see "deletions" as positive contributions "a priori"
> when it is really fixing somethi
Ross Scanlon wrote:
informationfreeway.org/?lat=-20.374&lon=148.633&zoom=15&layers=00F000B0
You'll have to copy and paste the link.
Actually you will have to do more than that. the domain is incorrectly set up,
so only
http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=-20.374&lon=148.633&zoom=15&layers
Den 24-08-2013 00:24, Paul Norman skrev:
This is already done. That being said, before reporting a website problem, hit reload,
then if that doesn't fix it, close the window and try to reproduce the problem in a new
browser window.
I tried reloading with shift F5, and I tried both firefox and c
21 matches
Mail list logo
