just read this ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Slippy_map_tilenames
>I think that needs testing.
>
>Also, it should be pointed out that it is using an approximation for
>calculating the tileX and tileY.
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Sep 22, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Peter Barth wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>
I think that needs testing.
Also, it should be pointed out that it is using an approximation for
calculating the tileX and tileY.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 22, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Peter Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Arnie Shore schrieb:
>> All, given a coordinates range and zoom range, is there an
Hi,
Arnie Shore schrieb:
> All, given a coordinates range and zoom range, is there an available
> algorithm that will calculate the count of OSM tiles involved?
Without rounding and assuming negative values vor lat/lon in case of
south/west coordinates and start and end being zoomlevels that are
All, given a coordinates range and zoom range, is there an available
algorithm that will calculate the count of OSM tiles involved?
Thanks for any help on this. AS
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/
All,
For those interested in the world of GIS beyond just OpenStreetMap you may
be interested to know that version 2.0 of QGIS (a free open source
alternative to ArcGIS) has now been released.
My understanding is that the old OpenStreetMap plugin (which broke when we
moved to 64bit nodes) has bee
Am 22.09.2013 11:31, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> 2013/9/22 yvecai
>
>> Of course, it should be accompagnied with a large campaign of
>> multi-polygons fix.
>>
>
>
> I'd suggest to start modifying the recommendations in the wiki:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon
> reads:
> "I
On 22/09/2013 10:03, yvecai wrote:
Of course, it should be accompagnied with a large campaign of
multi-polygons fix.
... and a patch to any editors that don't create multipolygons in this
format. For example, here are three attempts at multipolygons in iD, P2
and JOSM:
http://api06.dev.o
We were hoping to get markers/chapters in the video so that you can jump to
the right section. Unfortunately this is taking longer than anticipated.
I'll follow up with this one and see how its going.
Cheers,
Rob
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.
2013/9/22 yvecai
> Of course, it should be accompagnied with a large campaign of
> multi-polygons fix.
>
I'd suggest to start modifying the recommendations in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon
reads:
"If you have one closed way making up the outer ring and it does not
de
Osm2pgsql is not used for the default map on osm.org.
While the current behaviour in osm2pgsql is OK for consumers, could a
'strict' mode to handle mutipolygons be used on osm.org default map ?
Of course, it should be accompagnied with a large campaign of
multi-polygons fix.
Yves
__
Am 22.09.2013 04:14, schrieb Eugene Alvin Villar:
>
> I agree that this is a good way of tagging multipolygons.
>
> Unfortunately, many people don't tag multipolygons in this way. I've seen
> people add building=yes to an outer way of a building with holes even
> though there's a multipolygon rel
11 matches
Mail list logo
