Re: [OSM-talk] Layers and landuse

2015-06-30 Thread Lester Caine
On 30/06/15 11:36, Richard Z. wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:14:07PM +0100, Lester Caine wrote: >> On 29/06/15 15:08, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> The step from 2D to 3D would add a lot of complexity on the mappers, >>> narrowing down the mass of contributors potentially willing and able to

Re: [OSM-talk] Deletions in Korea

2015-06-30 Thread Hong, Yongmin
I suppose that the NIS HQ is removed as local law stating NIS HQ is classified as 'somewhat security and shouldn't be public' zone [1] and is excluded from local maps such as Naver Map, Daum Map, etc etc. IIRC local law enforces local map publishers from posting the location but that's not our case

Re: [OSM-talk] Mechanical edits

2015-06-30 Thread Richard Z.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:12:24PM +0200, Michael Reichert wrote: > A large bounding box of a changeset is not a proof that the edit is > mechanical. There are also users at OSM who first edit an object in > Europe and afterwards in America before they upload their changes. (This > usually happens

Re: [OSM-talk] Layers and landuse

2015-06-30 Thread Richard Z.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:14:07PM +0100, Lester Caine wrote: > On 29/06/15 15:08, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > The step from 2D to 3D would add a lot of complexity on the mappers, > > narrowing down the mass of contributors potentially willing and able to > > participate. Everyone would have t

Re: [OSM-talk] Layers and landuse

2015-06-30 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 29.06.2015 um 19:52 schrieb Florian Lohoff : > > playground != landuse - leisure=playground is part of a > landuse=residential imho. could be seen like this for a subset of playgrounds (those close to residences), but they also occur far away from residential areas (