sent from a phone
> Am 29.06.2015 um 19:52 schrieb Florian Lohoff <f...@zz.de>: > > playground != landuse - leisure=playground is part of a > landuse=residential imho. could be seen like this for a subset of playgrounds (those close to residences), but they also occur far away from residential areas (eg in commercial areas, in the forest, associated to a restaurant, swimming pool or beach, ....) I would not include them in any common landuse (that we use in osm), no need to put explicit landuse objects on every square millimeter, a hospital, playground, school or church already implicitly define the landuse > > I'd put a area landuse=residential area amenity=school name=University ... on > that area -1 > > I see a huge problem coming with maintenance of the map where people > have glued together all different types of object. +1, especially the glueing of objects in incompatible models (highway centre lines and common areas) is a preliminary sin that hopefully will vanish sooner or later (probably when area:highway becomes more popular) > The most problematic i see here is landuse (or other area based objects > like amenity, leisure etc) and highway. As highway does > not have a dimension the landuse reusing the highway nodes means > covering half of the street. E.g. for me landuse=forest sharing > nodes with the street means that there are trees on one side of the > road until the center line. +1 cheers Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
