Colin,
it is a very common fallacy in OSM to claim that out of some sense of
fairness, the fact that there is already some data in OSM that
violates some rules (e.g. boundaries being in OSM even though hardly
verifiable on the ground) is an automatic enabler of any and all other
content
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@
On 16/08/15 01:46, Paul Norman wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:09 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
The simple answer seems to be that there is no standard when it comes to
mapping applications and everybody creates their own personal special
such as kosmtik rather than working with established standards:(
http://james-gould.com/however.php?Ilyasse_Kabor_u00e9
Ilyasse Kabor\u00e9
Sent from my iPhone___
Talk-bf mailing list
Talk-bf@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-bf
On 16/08/15 12:16, Christopher Baines wrote:
The obvious question is that given tilemill is not longer being
maintained, what are the preferred alternatives? I'm actually not happy
with the way OSRM has moved and there does not seem to be a 'standard'
for the support structure?
Could you
moltonel molto...@gmail.com writes:
This is a perfect example of the confusion around landuse=forest vs
natural=wood. Size and density ? Managed ? Named ? Usage type ? The
curent osm data is a mix of all these criterias an more; at this stage
it is hopeless for the consumer to extract more
On 15/08/15 16:14, Lester Caine wrote:
Not getting much help on the GB list so I thought I'd widen the
question. A couple of years back I had my own server setup working with
a base of OSRM and routing covering the UK. While the map server is
still working, routing has packed up and some of
On 15/08/2015 21:42, Lester Caine wrote:
My quick fix for any new rendering is simply to switch off 'farmland' so
that the tree blocks it masks actually display.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245442613 is an example of the problem,
as are the adjacent areas to the right, while to the left
2015-08-16 15:27 GMT+02:00 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
landuse=forest does not imply the area is completely tree covered.
Note that in typical usage it means exactly this. Maybe original intention
was for that tag was to mean something else - but it is not changing how
it is used by most
Hi all,
Given that paths and footways are now rendered the same way in the default
OSM style I wonder whether it is time to look at how the map can provide
better information.
For rural mappers tagging a path/footway as unpaved surface results in it
having less prominence on the map. As most
On 15/08/2015 20:59, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
... And then there are areas where actually trees grow, sometimes in a forest
and sometimes elsewhere. That's where landcover trees seems appropriate for me.
Maybe a diary entry explaining your point of view on this in detail
would help
On 16/08/15 12:52, Lester Caine wrote:
On 16/08/15 12:16, Christopher Baines wrote:
The obvious question is that given tilemill is not longer being
maintained, what are the preferred alternatives? I'm actually not happy
with the way OSRM has moved and there does not seem to be a 'standard'
Tak jsem chtěl nahrát několik fotek turistických rozcestníků z mého výletu Z
Lázní Bělohrad do Bílé Třemešné na uvedenou stránku http://old.
openstreetmap.cz/
Kliknu na vložit obrázek rozcestníku, vyberu fotografii, zaškrtnu data exif
a dám nahrát, objeví se hláška - nepodařilo se zjistit
On 16/08/2015 01:46, Paul Norman wrote:
... The problem with Tilemill is that is is abandoned, and includes
in-program text editing, which adds significant complexity to the
codebase, and this text editing does not function with large complex
styles.
FWIW I've always used TileMill with an
Posli mi jednu na otestovani.Mozna tam je taky nekde chybka jak se
zmenilo hostname, podivam se na to.
2015-08-16 16:46 GMT+02:00 Zdeněk Pražák zpra...@seznam.cz:
Tak jsem chtěl nahrát několik fotek turistických rozcestníků z mého výletu Z
Lázní Bělohrad do Bílé Třemešné na uvedenou stránku
On 16/08/15 16:30, Christopher Baines wrote:
One of the reasons why I asked is that OSRM recently was packaged for
Debian [1], which I am hoping will help with working towards making it
easier to setup and run.
I've dropped back to suse 13.1 again just to get something working, but
even that
Frederik Ramm wrote:
What everybody can see is a clearing or change in the surface
of something. That's fine to map.
Inferring from that that there must have been a railway there is a
step too far. We are mappers, not trappers.
Ok, let's try an experiment.
Go to
sent from a phone
Am 16.08.2015 um 22:11 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
What everybody can see is a clearing or change in the surface of
something. That's fine to map.
Inferring from that that there must have been a railway there is a step
too far. We are mappers, not
To make it more clear - this issue is open therefore fixing it is
considered as a
good idea and it is planned.
See comments on
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1604
for more details.
As always - preparing a tested PR is a good way to change things. Waiting
for
others to
On 16/08/2015, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
What everybody can see is a clearing or change in the surface
of something. That's fine to map.
Inferring from that that there must have been a railway there is a
step too far. We are mappers, not trappers.
On 16/08/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
it really depends, this is an example for an abandoned railway where reading
the traces is quite easy, and which is tagged (IMHO correctly) as abandoned
railway in osm:
I am not aware about values that should be used in that case.
2015-08-16 20:58 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2015-08-16 19:00 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
Note that in typical usage it means exactly this. Maybe original
intention
was for that
This issue is tracked as
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1604
2015-08-16 23:42 GMT+02:00 Andrew MacKinnon andrew...@gmail.com:
OpenStreetMap Carto 2.33.0 has been released. This release focuses on
cartographic style improvements, but the release notes also include
Warin writes:
On 16/08/2015 1:35 AM, Russ Nelson wrote:
Seriously? THIS is your line of reasoning? There's a simple way to
empower them: If it's got TIGER tags and you don't see it, delete it.
TIGER tags?
Don't they only occur in one area of the world? Rather a small view
of
Hi,
The new rendering of forests broke cases where a lake is inside a forest
and the lake is not mapped as an inner section of the surrounding forest
polygon.
I posted this issue in the carto issue tracker:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1754
But after some
On 8/16/2015 1:57 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
Until I provided a counter-example there, the only example on
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747 was of a
well-mapped central European city. If there is evaluation of the
results in both rural and urban settings in
2015-08-16 11:03 GMT+02:00 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Data that is not verifiable on the ground is the absolute *exception* in
OSM, and needs a very strong reason for being there.
this thread as far as I have understood is not about things that have
disappeared without any traces but
On 16 August 2015 at 21:06, ajt1...@gmail.com ajt1...@gmail.com
That makes some sense, but OSM-Carto's biggest problem is that a number of
the changes over the last year have been dedicated to making well-mapped
central European urban areas look nice at the expense of the rest of the
planet.
On 16 August 2015 at 22:57, ajt1...@gmail.com ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
Until I provided a counter-example there, the only example on
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747 was of a
well-mapped central European city. If there is evaluation of the results in
both rural and
A reminder that we will be in Derby for the pub meeting this month. We will
be trying a new venue: The Old Silk Mill. (There were lots of other
attractive suggestions, but juggling distance from bus station, football
matches etc. led me to his one). If it is not to everyone's taste we can
try one
2015-08-16 16:19 GMT+02:00 ajt1...@gmail.com ajt1...@gmail.com:
what meaning you think natural=wood and landuse=forest have? Pictures
you've taken of the areas would be really helpful too.
did you actually read what I have written above? Are there any specific
parts that weren't clear that
On 16/08/2015 21:27, Lester Caine wrote:
The tree areas that are within the farmland area are NOT now farmland
and probably never were
Can you point to a tree area within farmland? I couldn't see one when
I had a quick look. It's slightly confusing because the multipolygon is
pulling the
2015-08-16 19:00 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
Note that in typical usage it means exactly this. Maybe original intention
was for that tag was to mean something else - but it is not changing how
it is used by most mappers.
which landuse is good for an area where trees
On 16/08/2015 22:04, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 16 August 2015 at 22:57, ajt1...@gmail.com ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
Until I provided a counter-example there, the only example on
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747 was of a
well-mapped central European city. If there
As this has dropped off the active thread list a bit.
I'd broadly agree with this, though I'm more corporate sponsors than members.
My feeling on responding with a greater emphasis on community rather than
techy stuff was that those OSM discussions I've been to (mapping parties in
Gravesend,
On 16/08/2015 18:26, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Hi all,
Given that paths and footways are now rendered the same way in the
default OSM style I wonder whether it is time to look at how the map
can provide better information.
For rural mappers tagging a path/footway as unpaved surface results in
On 16/08/2015 21:20, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 16 August 2015 at 21:06, ajt1...@gmail.com ajt1...@gmail.com
That makes some sense, but OSM-Carto's biggest problem is that a number of
the changes over the last year have been dedicated to making well-mapped
central European urban areas look
いいだです。
遅くなってしまいましたが、変更セットへのコメントを行っています。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33048672
2015年8月11日 9:22 Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com:
いいだです。
ありがとうございます。
ライセンス互換性、個別の許可の取得
なるほど、個別の許諾交渉というのはひとつの手かもしれませんね。
環境省生物多様性センターさんに知り合いはいないので、
正面からあたってみるしかないかんじですが、、、
Richard Fairhurst writes:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Inferring from that that there must have been a railway there is a
step too far. We are mappers, not trappers.
Tell me again you can't infer there must have been a railway there. I dare
you. I double dare you.
Nobody is asking
39 matches
Mail list logo
