On 12/09/2015 8:36 AM, Colin Smale wrote:
Why shouldn't it work? It is perfectly easy to understand what is
intended.
Anyway where is the list or definition of what constitutes a *primary*
tag?
On 2015-09-12 00:11, Dave F. wrote:
On 11/09/2015 03:07, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
But the prima
Dave F. writes:
> > Don't destroy other people's mapping. Why is this not obvious?
>
> What's obvious is that it's a track.
May I make a suggestion that I don't really want you to take? If you
really agree with Frederik that abandoned railways should not be
mapped, and you think it's okay to d
Dave F. writes:
> > Because when I see a spike, or a lump of coal, or a "road"
> > which is level where no road needed to be but a railroad did, I map it
> > as an abandoned railroad.
>
> Please give a list of tags you'd use to map the tracks in your photos.
highway=track
railway=abandoned
Why shouldn't it work? It is perfectly easy to understand what is
intended.
Anyway where is the list or definition of what constitutes a *primary*
tag?
On 2015-09-12 00:11, Dave F. wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 03:07, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
>> But the primary key is definitely highway=track, pe
On 11/09/2015 03:07, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
But the primary key is definitely highway=track, perhaps with some
secondary keys that hit at it's former use.
+1
As I've said elsewhere there should only be one primary tag, any
historical info should be secondary.
highway=track
railway=abandone
On 10/09/2015 10:04, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
more or less we're doing this. And adding what has been added in the meantime.
E.g. people have added the names of the ruins of temples as the name of the
temple (which is in some cases there as ruins in others hardly visible if not
by reading th
On 10/09/2015 04:15, Russ Nelson wrote:
Look at these two photos and tell me what you can see, what you can
"verify":
https://goo.gl/photos/G41ehgPJyfEWcvwH7
https://goo.gl/photos/FfgSS5bDMQ3XW7MX8
What's this? Is it a trail or is it an abandoned railroad? See the
spike? Where did it come from
On 11/09/15 01:27, Warin wrote:
> I'll be putting a block on any more messages with the subject containing
> Fw:important
The buggers are using several subjects, multiple probably hacked relay
sites, but all ending at the same crap. Just need that site closing down?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
sent from a phone
> Am 11.09.2015 um 00:51 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
> I put it to you that this bridge is not a property of these things.
it is both for osm: an attribute for the ways running over it, stating that
they are on a bridge (key bridge), and you can map the bridge
9 matches
Mail list logo
