2015-11-09 7:39 GMT+01:00 GerdP :
> I only know a discussion in Germany which came to the
> conclusion that tags like unclassified_link, residential_link and
> service_link make not much sense:
> http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=26083
> The wiki doesn't mention those _link types as
I just noticed that I forgot to set the list on cc, see below.
Gerd
Von: Gerd Petermann
Gesendet: Montag, 9. November 2015 10:03
An: Martin Koppenhoefer
Betreff: AW: [OSM-talk] Undiscussed (?) edits removing lesser-used highway=*
tags
"a link "links" (connect
On 11/09/2015 01:39 AM, GerdP wrote:
Andrew Guertin wrote
As a negative example, they seem to have deemed the tag
highway=residential_link bad, and replaced it with either
highway=service or highway=residential.
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18820600/history,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/w
A question recently came up as to whether highway=residential_link is a
meaningful tag or whether uses of it should be changed to some other
value (like highway=residential or highway=service).
This tag has no description in the wiki, though it is analogous to the
other highway=*_link types de
Oops, this was supposed to go to tagging...
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
As i already pointed out, the problem is not so much fixing obvious
mistakes (typos, clear misclassification) thank you for that, but
wanting conformity to inconclusive results of discussions on a fairly
obscure mailing list.
One of the great strengths of OSM is that you can invent tagging on the
6 matches
Mail list logo
