(sorry to break the thread; I was following the discussion through the
archive, but I wasn't subscribed)
Simon Poole wrote:
> Our concern should be more about Mexico, Brazil and other countries
> where it is at least not obvious to me if the local communities are
> aware of the issue and if we hav
Hi Mike
I don't think so since the combo box has a unique key name set in its
definition
What you can do though is to set the first key with a fixed value
(religion=chrisitian) and let user pick for denomination
Let us know how is it going
François
Le 29 août 2017 5:44 PM, "Mike Thompson" a
Very good outcome !
I've made a quick french translation:
https://annuel2.framapad.org/p/guidelines-geocodage-osm
Edits are welcome, as it is 95% automatic translation from
https://www.deepl.com/translator (very good new translator)... plus my own
5% quick edits ;)
2017-08-29 11:10 GMT+02:00 Si
I am learning how to create custom presets for JOSM.
Is there a way to have a "combo" list set multiple tags? For example (just
to illustrate the question), to make it so that if the user picks "Roman
Catholic", religion=christian and denomination=roman_catholic are both set?
Thanks,
Mike
___
On Tuesday 29 August 2017, Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> When the old-style-mp support was disabled on the main map, this left
> about 50,000 broken multipolygons, in many cases clearly visible on
> the map. I didn't see a single complaint about this. So, no, I don't
> think being a bit more strict with b
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:54:44PM +0200, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2017, Jochen Topf wrote:
> >
> > > Would the number of visible problems in the map due to dropping
> > > broken geometries now, after the fixing effort, be low enough so
> > > this change could be made to the
On Tuesday 29 August 2017, Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> > Would the number of visible problems in the map due to dropping
> > broken geometries now, after the fixing effort, be low enough so
> > this change could be made to the main map to give mappers a better
> > feedback about broken geometries?
>
>
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:10:47PM +0200, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:10:47 +0200
> From: Christoph Hormann
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Multipolygon fixing effort done
>
> On Tuesday 29 August 2017, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > We have completed the 7
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:36:49 +0200
Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
> On 8/29/2017 12:50 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> > ...
> > I fail to imagine a beach that is not walkable.
> > ...
>
> In France, yes. [..] In other parts there are still beaches which
> could belong to a company, an organization, t
This really needs routers to be able to route over areas, the same issue exists
over large areas of grass such as found in parks or town squares.
Phil (trigpoint)
On 29 August 2017 12:00:48 BST, James wrote:
>"Dont tag for the rendered"
>
>Routers should make beaches routable even though there
On 8/29/2017 12:50 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
...
I fail to imagine a beach that is not walkable.
...
In France, yes. And I understand by now why. I am currently reading
Victor Hugo's "Les Misérables", and he writes in this novel that one of
the reasons of the French Revolution of 1789 was
"Dont tag for the rendered"
Routers should make beaches routable even though theres no clear path. Same
with indoor mapping: I'm not going to add a bunch of paths in something
already tagged as a corridor/hallway
On Aug 29, 2017 6:54 AM, "Jean-Marc Liotier" wrote:
> Last week-end I went hiking
Last week-end I went hiking along the coast from Honfleur to
Trouville-sur-Mer. As I wondered what distance I walked, I turned to
Openstreetmap routers... And did not find my answer: beaches are not
considered as highways.
I thought about adding paths to beach sections that I consider
walkable...
On Tuesday 29 August 2017, Jochen Topf wrote:
> We have completed the 7-months effort to switch away from old-style
> multipolygons and fix a lot of broken (multi)polygons. More about
> this on my blog:
>
> https://blog.jochentopf.com/2017-08-28-polygon-fixing-effort-conclude
>d.html
First of all
Yes.
A new contributor's first changeset count should be 1.
On 26/08/2017 20:02, Bryan Housel wrote:
Ok, I see what you mean.. Would it be ok if we just add +1 to the number before
uploading the changeset?
On Aug 26, 2017, at 2:17 PM, Dave F wrote:
It does display the same number as is
We have completed the 7-months effort to switch away from old-style
multipolygons and fix a lot of broken (multi)polygons. More about this
on my blog:
https://blog.jochentopf.com/2017-08-28-polygon-fixing-effort-concluded.html
Jochen
--
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/
I'm happy to announce that the geocoding guideline was endorsed by the
OSMF board at its last meeting and is now published on the OSMF website
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Geocoding_-_Guideline
This hopefully addresses and clarifies a long time, sometimes hotly,
17 matches
Mail list logo
