Hi,
I'm thinking about changes in rendering of protected areas on osm-carto
and I wanted to give community a hint, because it's a popular kind of
objects. There is a fresh discussion about it from this comment on:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/603#issuecomment-347
On Thursday 30 November 2017, Daniel Koc4� wrote:
>
> I'm thinking about changes in rendering of protected areas on
> osm-carto and I wanted to give community a hint, because it's a
> popular kind of objects.
I have no definitive opinion on the tagging question but i consider your
approach here h
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about changes in rendering of protected areas on osm-carto
> and I wanted to give community a hint, because it's a popular kind of
> objects. There is a fresh discussion about it from this comment on:
>
> https://github.com
W dniu 30.11.2017 o 17:38, Christoph Hormann pisze:
There are 62k uses of boundary=protected_area and 77k of
leisure=nature_reserve and 31k of the combination - which does not
really support your idea that the latter is used just as a hack.
How would you detect such a hack then?
In my opinion
On 30/11/2017 13:46, Daniel Koć wrote:
1. Currently leisure=nature_reserve (old scheme) and boundary=* (new
scheme) are frequently tagged in parallel, and it looks like the old
scheme is used as a hack just to make it visible on default map.
Just to chuck one example in - I've tagged lots of
Do we have a tool that will give me the length of a way (or a
relation, made from several continuous ways)?
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
If you select the way in JOSM it will give you the length in the lower
margin of the window. I don't know about relations.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> Do we have a tool that will give me the length of a way (or a
> relation, made from several continuous ways)?
>
> --
For a batch solution:
* Pyosmium has an osm "road length" example:
https://github.com/osmcode/pyosmium/blob/master/examples/road_length.py
2017-12-01 1:15 GMT+01:00 Andy Mabbett :
> Do we have a tool that will give me the length of a way (or a
> relation, made from several continuous ways)?
>
>
Relation length:
In JOSM
Select a member way
In the "tags/memberships" window scroll down to the "Member of" section
Right click
Select members (add)
Note the length in the lower margin of JOSM's main window
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
> If you select the way in JOSM it
On 1 December 2017 at 00:20, Mike Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Andy Mabbett
> wrote:
>>
>> Do we have a tool that will give me the length of a way (or a
>> relation, made from several continuous ways)?
> If you select the way in JOSM it will give you the length in the lowe
On 1 December 2017 at 00:45, Mike Thompson wrote:
> Relation length:
> In JOSM
> Select a member way
> In the "tags/memberships" window scroll down to the "Member of" section
> Right click
> Select members (add)
> Note the length in the lower margin of JOSM's main window
Really, really, useful.
sent from a phone
On 30. Nov 2017, at 23:09, Daniel Koć wrote:
>> There are 62k uses of boundary=protected_area and 77k of
>> leisure=nature_reserve and 31k of the combination - which does not
>> really support your idea that the latter is used just as a hack.
>
> How would you detect such a
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:05 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On 30/11/2017 13:46, Daniel Koć wrote:
>
>> 1. Currently leisure=nature_reserve (old scheme) and boundary=* (new
>> scheme) are frequently tagged in parallel, and it looks like the old scheme
>> is used as a hack just to make it visible
I’m not sure if this is still valid, but a long time ago the measurements in
Josm weren’t very accurate, especially for long distances, where the curvature
of the earth leads to significant errors if not accounted for. Don’t know
whether Josm uses an ellipsoid or spheroid (I recall initially it
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I’m not sure if this is still valid, but a long time ago the measurements
> in Josm weren’t very accurate...
It uses the great circle distance[0], which is accurate to about 0.5%[1],
still over long distances that can add up. I belie
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:05 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> On 30/11/2017 13:46, Daniel Koć wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Currently leisure=nature_reserve (old scheme) and boundary=* (new
>>> scheme) are frequently tagged in parallel, and it looks li
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:05 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 30/11/2017 13:46, Daniel Koć wrote:
>>>
1. Currently leisure=nature_reserve (old scheme) and boundar
17 matches
Mail list logo
