Re: [OSM-talk] Organised Editing Guidelines now officially live

2019-01-17 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Thursday 17 January 2019, Guillaume Rischard wrote: > > What we mean is that we’ll intervene for edits the community has > issues with, and that we will not intervene for merely not following > the guidelines. Note the guidelines themselves claim that they represent "consensus". Without open

Re: [OSM-talk] Organised Editing Guidelines now officially live

2019-01-17 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi Guillaume, Thanks, that clarifies it for me. Just to be clear, where you mention 'special sources' -- those would still need to be vetted for compatibility with ODbL, and that would need to be done in the open. I don't think anyone, individual or organization, should be able to get away with

Re: [OSM-talk] Organised Editing Guidelines now officially live

2019-01-17 Thread Guillaume Rischard
Hi Martijn, Gladly. I seem to recall that this is also one of the points that you asked questions about during the board meeting. What we mean is that we’ll intervene for edits the community has issues with, and that we will not intervene for merely not following the guidelines. Maybe a few ex

[OSM-talk] ARIADNEplus Project uses OSM

2019-01-17 Thread Andy Mabbett
Nice use of OSM data in the ARIADNEplus Project, a new European initiative for Digital Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.: http://portal.ariadne-infrastructure.eu/ -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ talk mailing list tal