Re: [OSM-talk] Congratulations everyone!

On Sun, 24 Mar 2019 at 06:49, Kate Chapman wrote: > Today the OpenStreetMap project won the Award for Projects of > Social Benefit from the Free Software Foundation. This was > awarded at LibrePlanet. That's great news. Do we have a page on the wiki to record such things? The page at: https

Re: [OSM-talk] Congratulations everyone!

Yes, there is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Awards_for_OpenStreetMap Mar. 25, 2019, 1:18 p.m. by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk: > On Sun, 24 Mar 2019 at 06:49, Kate Chapman <> k...@maploser.com > > > wro

Re: [OSM-talk] HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

Any chance you could do more changes per changeset? At the moment this is flooding feeds in osmcha with many small changesets, it would be easier if you did one big changeset. On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 18:05, Bryce Jasmer wrote: > I have written a script that will search for OSM objects that have a

Re: [OSM-talk] HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

And from my side - avoid making changesets with more than 1000 objects. Reverting changesets that went wrong, with tens of thousands modified objects is basically not making possible to review it. Mar 26, 2019, 12:41 AM by andrew.harv...@gmail.com: > Any chance you could do more changes per chang

Re: [OSM-talk] HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

Is this a problem that only a few are concerned with? Can I get a geographic area where I can run a larger number of changes in a larger bounding box? I could easily make some one-off changes on a per country basis if that would help. And would fewer changesets of, say, 100 objects be a good middle

Re: [OSM-talk] HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

For example https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/68527117 changed just one feature, there were about 20 other changes all in the same city, maybe the script has run it's course now I don't know, it's just lots of small changesets clog up osmcha making it harder to skip over them in bulk. On Tue, 26