For example https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/68527117 changed just one feature, there were about 20 other changes all in the same city, maybe the script has run it's course now I don't know, it's just lots of small changesets clog up osmcha making it harder to skip over them in bulk.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 16:45, Bryce Jasmer <br...@jasmer.com> wrote: > Is this a problem that only a few are concerned with? Can I get a > geographic area where I can run a larger number of changes in a larger > bounding box? I could easily make some one-off changes on a per country > basis if that would help. And would fewer changesets of, say, 100 objects > be a good middle-of-the-road number? > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:03 PM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> > wrote: > >> And from my side - avoid making changesets with more than 1000 objects. >> Reverting changesets that went wrong, with tens of thousands modified >> objects >> is basically not making possible to review it. >> >> Mar 26, 2019, 12:41 AM by andrew.harv...@gmail.com: >> >> Any chance you could do more changes per changeset? At the moment this is >> flooding feeds in osmcha with many small changesets, it would be easier if >> you did one big changeset. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
