[Talk-it] Direttiva UE sul copyright

Cosa cambia per OpenStreetMap ora che la il parlamento europeo ha approvato la controversa direttiva sul copyright? ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Hi All, I like the idea of imports, and think there's a lot of value of batch importing - however we need to run a QA/AC for each. For Manitoba I think the challenge is getting municipalities to sign on, and move their data to the canadian open data portal (that is, if they have data or any

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Cette discussion sur gis.stackexchange donne le lien vers OpenCarto sur Sourceforge et vers un document décrivant la méthode.https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/25263/is-there-any-open-source-building-squaring-tool Avec les fonctions PostGIS, à voir comment ST_ShortestLine ou fonction

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Bonjour Tim Mon outil d'analyse Qualité dont les données sont publiées sur OpenDataLabRDC est basé sur PostgreSQL-Postgis.   Je suis à nettoyer / documenter le code et prévoit le publier sur github.  J'ai commencé à regarder les outils possibles, mais peu de documentation disponible. On parle

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

I sent Daniel a sample of Montreal (Outrement) from the Open Building Database and Daniel's algorithm performed really well. It could reduce the vertices count by 13% without loosing or even improving data quality (as it orthogonalized the buildings). Even difficult buildings were treated well

Re: [talk-au] Station areas for railway=station

As far as I can tell train=yes is an access tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access saying trains are allowed, which seems implied by railway=station. Do you have any other references which explain what the train=yes tag is for and what it implies in this case? I agree wheelchair=yes

[talk-au] OSM CDN cache and AARNet - movement, and request for information

Hi all It looks like AARNet are coming to the OSM cache party! Being academically focussed, they would like a list of researchers who use OSM and would benefit from the local cache. I’m happy to compile one, so please feel free to reply off list with: - name - institution - broad project

Re: [talk-au] Station areas for railway=station

Am 2019-03-26 11:54, schrieb Andrew Harvey: On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 11:43, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: If https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34891023/ is to be the railway=station then it needs to be expanded to include the are of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16748116 I've

Re: [Talk-de] Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich - maxspeed

Wenn ein Schild "7" steht, tagge ich "7". Wenn ein Schild steht, das "Schrittgeschwindigkeit" impliziert, tagge ich "walk". Ich maße mir nicht an zu entscheiden, ob "walk" nun 5 km/h, 6 km/h, 7 km/h, ... bedeutet. Das hat weder der Gesetzgeber festgelegt, noch haben das Gerichte einheitlich

Re: [Talk-de] Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich - maxspeed

sent from a phone > On 26. Mar 2019, at 23:28, Bernhard Weiskopf wrote: > > Ich verwende "maxspeed = walk" entsprechend dem proposal > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed, denn ich nehme nicht an, > dass alle Router weltweit alle nationalen Besonderheiten kennen. interessant,

Re: [Talk-it] Ma questa mappa non è la nostra?

sent from a phone > On 26. Mar 2019, at 09:39, Lorenzo Pesci wrote: > > A chi si fa una segnalazione, Martin? credo al board oppure alla licence working group oppure a tutt’e due. bo...@openstreetmapfoundation.org https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group quando si

Re: [Talk-de] Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich - maxspeed

Ich verwende "maxspeed = walk" entsprechend dem proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed, denn ich nehme nicht an, dass alle Router weltweit alle nationalen Besonderheiten kennen. "Schrittgeschwindigkeit" steht in der Rechtsvorschrift, die gilt auch bei anderen Wegen wie

Re: [Talk-it] aree pic-nic

sent from a phone > On 26. Mar 2019, at 11:46, demon_box wrote: > > io per ora faccio così: > > - solo 1 tavolo leisure=picnic_table senza area tourism=picnic_site > - da almeno 2 tavoli in sù traccio l'area come tourism=picnic_site e se > riesco aggiungo anche i singoli

Re: [Talk-ca] FW: Building Import

Voir https://github.com/opendatalabrdc/Documentation/tree/master/topology où nous avons entreposé des fichiers geojson du projet de OpenDatalabRDC pour consultation.voir par

Re: [Talk-ca] FW: Building Import

Screenshots? A good idea for having everyone seeing the results over complicated polygons (I will try keep objective in my selection ;-) I am working to get it right on multiple adjacent polygons. I'll make the results available after I got them. Daniel -Original Message- From: Jarek

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

At least it is an indication of interest. Thanks John On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 4:57 PM Darren Wiebe, wrote: > I'm from rural Alberta close to Lloydminster. The building import is > something that interests me and would be useful in my area but I haven't > been very actively mapping over the last

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

I'm from rural Alberta close to Lloydminster. The building import is something that interests me and would be useful in my area but I haven't been very actively mapping over the last year or two. Hopefully there are Alberta mappers on here who are much more active than I have been. Darren Wiebe

[Talk-ca] FW: Building Import

As usual, missed the reply all … From: jfd...@hotmail.com Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 16:26 To: 'John Whelan' Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Building Import It is really kind to consider my background ;-) You are right regarding the "black box" approach; this is why a large approval from the

Re: [Talk-us] Is there any value at all in tiger:MTFCC and tiger:FUNCSTAT tags? (Kevin Kenny)

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 4:02 PM OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: > The usage of a tag (via taginfo) does give some indication of its usefulness > (e.g. school can't be that important a boundary tag if there are only nine or > ten of them in all of OSM), unless massive numbers of them were imported,

Re: [OSM-talk] HOT and the OSMF

On 3/26/19 8:31 PM, john whelan wrote: Apparently I'm the mapper who is the 4th in Mali and currently I do not map for HOT. HOT does not have a monopoly in Mali. Yes - rural Mali in Openstreetmap owes a lot to you. I'm the one who is first on that list (I'm more a urban mapping sort or

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

I think my concerns are to do with the "black box" approach.  Knowing your background I trust your work but others might not. On a technical side I get the impression that cites with buildings that are close to each other are problematical.  I assume that small locations with a population of

Re: [Talk-us] Is there any value at all in tiger:MTFCC and tiger:FUNCSTAT tags? (Kevin Kenny)

FWIW, I believe these TIGER tags have exceedingly low value in OSM: approaching or at zero. I say this because of a large/wide/far-reaching consensus we have reached with "similar" values in the USA on boundary=admin_level tags, where such entities were not only found to not be admin_levels

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Voici les observations que j'ai fait à Daniel a partir des données du premier test qu'il a effectué pour Toronto. Un premier examen visuel pour le BBOX utilisé montre que l'outil a produit correctement les formes orthogonales en général. J'ai constaté cependant des cas où un des angles

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Dessiner bande de part et d'autre d'une ligne ferroviaire ?

Tu peux aussi utiliser l'API Overpass. Exemple de requête commentée pour que tu adaptes à tes besoins. Jean-Yvon Le 26/03/2019 à 15:58, Shohreh - codecompl...@free.fr a écrit : En attendant de trouver comment faire ça plus rapidement et élégamment avec un

Re: [OSM-talk] HOT and the OSMF

Apparently I'm the mapper who is the 4th in Mali and currently I do not map for HOT. HOT does not have a monopoly in Mali. Cheerio John Cheerio John On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 2:26 PM Jean-Marc Liotier, wrote: > In some countries (Mali for example), HOT is by far the institution with > the most

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Jarek, The area you proposed in quite interesting and will force me to look further at buildings with sharing edges, a concern Pierre also had. I'll be back soon with your area processed. Daniel -Original Message- From: Begin Daniel [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 26,

[OSM-talk-fr] CartONG vous invite à la Nuit de la Géographie - 5 avril

Bonjour à tous,* * *CartONG et ses partenaires vous invitent à nous rejoindre le vendredi 5 avril dans le cadre de la Nuit de la Géographie 2019.* Au programme : de la cartographie participative sur OpenStreetMap en soutien aux organisations humanitaires ! /La Nuit de la Géo : qu’est ce que

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Jarek, Since it is a one-time process, I expect to be able to process the files if the community feels comfortable with it. In the meantime, people are welcome to send me the bounding box of an area they would like to examine. Daniel -Original Message- From: Jarek Piórkowski

Re: [talk-cz] path nebo footway?

Nevím, kde jsem dal oči - je to tam opravdu service, tak se to jen prodlouží. A ze severu to je vlastně serviska taky... A ti Němci to zvláštně zkomplikovali... Díky moc, dámo a pánové, za podnětné informace! :-) On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:22 PM Petr Vozdecký wrote: > Nehledej v tom nic

Re: [OSM-talk] HOT and the OSMF

In some countries (Mali for example), HOT is by far the institution with the most notoriety related to Openstreetmap - and it is often the only one. There, Openstreetmap appears to be a humanitarian mapping project under supervision and sponsorship of HOT. The confusion is real and the least

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 13:10, Begin Daniel wrote: > There is actually no standard “code” available since I use FME > (www.safe.com). It is a proprietary ETL application and all operations are > done using “transformers” (https://www.safe.com/transformers/). I can provide > you with the

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Article 13, directive droit d'auteur

Disons qu'en France le résultat est accablant. Même dans les groupes parlementaires européens qui ont décidé de demander des modifications ou de s'opposer, les membres français n'ont pas suivi le consensus de groupe. La vue d'ensemble est visible ici :

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

If you could share the workbench it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks On Tue., Mar. 26, 2019, 1:11 p.m. Begin Daniel, wrote: > Hi Jarek, > There is actually no standard “code” available since I use FME ( > www.safe.com). It is a proprietary ETL application and all operations are > done

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Hi Jarek, There is actually no standard “code” available since I use FME (www.safe.com). It is a proprietary ETL application and all operations are done using “transformers” (https://www.safe.com/transformers/). I can provide you with the workbench I developed (a bunch of linked transformers)

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Article 13, directive droit d'auteur

:( Aurons-nous le détail des votes avec les différents partis pour se souvenir en Mai justement ? Cédric Le 26/03/2019 à 15:16, marc marc a écrit : > 348 personnes ont voté une loi inapplicable > https://twitter.com/Senficon/status/1110509970213294081 triste jour > il n'a manqué que 5 voix

Re: [OSM-talk] HOT and the OSMF

sent from a phone > Am 26.03.2019 um 16:19 schrieb Tom Hughes : > > That redirect was setup many years and and it's highly > unlikely we would do it now, at least other than with the > direct approval of the board. back then Hot probably wasn’t even incorporated themselves, but now that

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 11:58, Begin Daniel wrote: > a first version of the cleaning tool is now functional. > > At this point, the tool is built to remove extra vertices, orthogonalize > building footprints (when possible) and identify overlapped geometries. > Details about the application are

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Hi all, a first version of the cleaning tool is now functional. At this point, the tool is built to remove extra vertices, orthogonalize building footprints (when possible) and identify overlapped geometries. Details about the application are found in Canada Building Import discussion page ...

Re: [Talk-es] Día del mapatón humanitario 2019

Si alguien se anima a editar esta wiki con el evento se lo agradezco: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mapat%C3%B3n On 26/3/19 16:17, Miguel Sevilla-Callejo wrote: Hola, Tal y como ya adelanté en un hilo anterior desde Zaragoza y junto con Médicos Sin Fronteras coordinando y con la

Re: [Talk-it] panettone di cemento

Dipende dove si mette. L'ho visto utilizzato anche per impedire le auto di entrare in una strada in questo caso potrebbe anche essere considerato come bollard. Lungo la strada non saprei neanche come taggare. Sia block sia bollard si riferiscono a una strada che si blocca parzialmante o

Re: [Talk-it] panettone di cemento

Il 26 Marzo 2019 16:16:55 CET, demon_box ha scritto: >ciao, quale tag per questo panettone di cemento che in italiano viene >chiamato (anche) dissuasore di sosta? > > > >grazie > >--enrico > > > > >-- >Sent from:

Re: [OSM-talk] HOT and the OSMF

On 26/03/2019 15:02, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Is there a formal connection between Hot Inc. and the OpenStreetMapFoundation? I just noticed hot.openstreetmap.org gets redirected to Hot Inc. It was not really obvious from their homepage to understand that it is

[Talk-es] Día del mapatón humanitario 2019

Hola, Tal y como ya adelanté en un hilo anterior desde Zaragoza y junto con Médicos Sin Fronteras coordinando y con la ayuda de muchos de vosotros hemos sacado adelante el evento del día del #mapatonhumanitario2019 al que os animo a apuntaros en cualquiera de las 15 sedes (14 ciudades) en las que

[Talk-it] panettone di cemento

ciao, quale tag per questo panettone di cemento che in italiano viene chiamato (anche) dissuasore di sosta? grazie --enrico -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

Re: [talk-cz] Spolupráce s ČD, a.s.

út 26. 3. 2019 v 15:20 odesílatel Roman Menc napsal: > rád bych se zeptal na případnou spolupráci s autory turistických tras, > využití mapové vrstvy turistických tras pro nově připravovaný projekt > volnočasového cestování s vlaky ČD. > > Nemohli byste mi poradit kompetentní osobu, se kterou

Re: [talk-cz] OsmHiCheck - silnicni znaceni vs rozcestniky

út 26. 3. 2019 v 12:47 odesílatel majka napsal: > > Což takhle na to použít tourist=information + information=route_marker ? > Považovala bych to za vhodnější než rozcestník, a fakticky by to odpovídalo. > Rozcestník pak případně nechat jen na opravdové silniční rozcestníky - tj. tam, kde se

[OSM-ja] 提案 highway=cycleway の Impliesについて

hayashiです highway=cycleway の Impliesについてですが '道路法'では「自転車専用道」であっても自転車以外の軽車両(carriage)や小型特殊自動車(agricultural)の通行は許可されています。 しかし、'標識令'では、「自転車専用(325の2)」標識の意味は「普通自転車（交通法第六十三条の三に規定するものをいう）以外の車両及び歩行者の通行を禁止する」ともあります

[OSM-talk] HOT and the OSMF

Is there a formal connection between Hot Inc. and the OpenStreetMapFoundation? I just noticed hot.openstreetmap.org gets redirected to Hot Inc. It was not really obvious from their homepage to understand that it is a Hot Inc. site and not (or is it?) an OSMF site. https://www.hotosm.org/ Do you

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Dessiner bande de part et d'autre d'une ligne ferroviaire ?

En attendant de trouver comment faire ça plus rapidement et élégamment avec un script… JOSM à la rescousse : https://ibb.co/6YRQM2w -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/France-f5380434.html ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-ja] 提案 highway=living_street

== 自動車の時間帯制限付きの歩行者天国について == アーケード通りをliving_streetとする際に自動車の通行が時間帯によって制限されている場所を条件に入れるのは良い考えだと思います。 しかし、単に時間帯によって歩行者専用道になるだけだと、交通量が多い４車線の「[ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328531802 秋葉原中央通り]」も日曜日が歩行者天国なので living_street となる可能性が出てきます。 主要な時間帯が歩行者専用になっているものに限定する意味で、下記の条件aを加えたほうが良いと思います。 a. 自動車の通行が

[talk-cz] Spolupráce s ČD, a.s.

Dobrý den,  rád bych se zeptal na případnou spolupráci s autory turistických tras, využití mapové vrstvy turistických tras pro nově připravovaný projekt volnočasového cestování s vlaky ČD.  Nemohli byste mi poradit kompetentní osobu, se kterou bych mohl jednat? Moc děkuji Roman Menc E-mail:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Article 13, directive droit d'auteur

348 personnes ont voté une loi inapplicable https://twitter.com/Senficon/status/1110509970213294081 triste jour il n'a manqué que 5 voix pour faire sauter l'article problématique. Souvenez-vous en lors du vote en mai ! ___ Talk-fr mailing list

Re: [Talk-de] Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich - maxspeed

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#Hinweise Im Gegensatz zu manch anderen Mapping-Projekten (z.B. Waze) setzen wir keinen Maxspeed für den verkehrsberuhigten Bereich. Viele GrüßeMichael Am Dienstag, 26. März 2019, 13:32:37 MEZ hat Andreas Labres Folgendes

Re: [Talk-de] Korrektes Tagging eines Feriengebiets

Am 25.03.2019 um 11:18 schrieb Florian Lohoff: Ich finde landuse=residential nicht so falsch. Am ende ist das Wohnen - Nur auf Zeit - aber nicht falsch. Auch in Hotel wird ja zum Wohnen genutzt (Udo Lindenberg wohnt Jahrzehnte Atlantic), deshalb ja auch die Anmeldung nach dem Meldewesen ;)

Re: [Talk-es] Perdido con Overpass Api

Gracias Santiago...con tu documentación y muchas horas sueltas dándome de cabezazos con el overpass api lo he sacado. Os pego la query (seguro que se puede hacer más óptima...pero bueno me apaña): area["name"="España"]->.country; rel["name"="España"]["type"="boundary"]["admin_level"="2"]; (

[Talk-de] Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich - maxspeed

Hallo! Mit welcher maxspeed (und ggf. source:maxspeed) taggt Ihr in DE einen Verkehrsberuhigten Bereich? 7 km/h? (ist in AT üblich für die "Wohnstraße", wie das Schild dort heißt) Servus, Andreas ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Dessiner bande de part et d'autre d'une ligne ferroviaire ?

Merci beaucoup pour les infos. De fait, comme suggéré par Frédéric Rodrigo, dessiner des cercles isochrones autour de chaque gare est une meilleure idée puisque ça correspond à la réalité des déplacements, même si ça donne un truc peut-être moins esthétique. Je vais regarder s'il est facile

Re: [talk-cz] OsmHiCheck - silnicni znaceni vs rozcestniky

Což takhle na to použít tourist=information + information=route_marker ? Považovala bych to za vhodnější než rozcestník, a fakticky by to odpovídalo. Rozcestník pak případně nechat jen na opravdové silniční rozcestníky - tj. tam, kde se dělí

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Dessiner bande de part et d'autre d'une ligne ferroviaire ?

Le 26.03.19 à 12:13, Shohreh a écrit : > Afin d'estimer combien de gens y ont accès, j'aimerais dessiner une bande > d'une largeur de 2km de part et d'autre d'une ligne de tram : > > https://ibb.co/9wJjbKj > > Existe-t-il un moyen de programmer ça en partant de la relation d'une ligne >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Dessiner bande de part et d'autre d'une ligne ferroviaire ?

De fait, un cercle isochrone autour de chaque _gare_ serait plus logique, même si moins esthétique. Quelqu'un a déjà pondu du code avec OpenTripPlanner ou Graphhopper pour dessiner des cercles isochrones autour de chaque gare d'une ligne de transport en commun ? -- Sent from:

Re: [talk-cz] path nebo footway?

Nehledej v tom nic sloziteho - cim jednodussi to je, tim lepe. Mluvime o zapadnim konci mostu: fyzicky to je prime napojeni te komunikace od zapadu oznacene jako highway=service a komunikace od severu oznacene jako highway= track. V miste vidim (po shlednuti ortofoto) jako nejlogictejsi reseni

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Vidéosurveillance

lmagreault wrote > Lors de l'installation ou la modification du système de vidéoprotection, > la > mairie a dû faire en préfecture une demande d'autorisation d'installer un > système de videoprotection. Super. Merci ! -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/France-f5380434.html

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Dessiner bande de part et d'autre d'une ligne ferroviaire ?

Si c'est l’accès aux trains, c'est des distances depuis les gares et pas la lignes. C'est des isochrones qu'il te faut utiliser. OpenTripPlanner ou Graphhopper peuvent te faire ça. Le 26/03/2019 à 12:13, Shohreh a écrit : Bonjour, Afin d'estimer combien de gens y ont accès, j'aimerais

[OSM-talk-fr] Dessiner bande de part et d'autre d'une ligne ferroviaire ?

Bonjour, Afin d'estimer combien de gens y ont accès, j'aimerais dessiner une bande d'une largeur de 2km de part et d'autre d'une ligne de tram : https://ibb.co/9wJjbKj Existe-t-il un moyen de programmer ça en partant de la relation d'une ligne ferroviaire ? Merci. -- Sent from:

Re: [Talk-it] Way contains segment twice

On 26 Mar 2019, at 10:45, Volker Schmidt wrote: > Probabilmente il segmento "diagonale" del way nel centro Perfetto, grazie, risolto! ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] aree pic-nic

dieterdreist wrote > +1, un’area picnic è uno spazio dedicato al picnic, non importa quanti > tavoli ci sono. Mappare i tavoli non implica dover mettere l’area. beh tutto sommato allora sto procedendo nel modo corretto. io per ora faccio così: - solo 1 tavolo leisure=picnic_table senza area

Re: [talk-cz] Rozcestníky - zbytečné opravy

Ozval se zpátky, s tím že na to narazil náhodou, takže to aktivně opravil. Dohoda v podstatě žádná (... systematicky neopravuje, takže to nevyhledává, ale pokud na to narazí příště, neslibuje nic ...). Takže za mě: taky ignorovat, a jet si dál po svém a doufat, že se v tom vrtat opravdu nebude. Na

Re: [talk-cz] Rozcestníky - zbytečné opravy

Ahoj, jen se pripominam, jestli je neco noveho? Diky tom.k st 20. 3. 2019 v 16:00 odesílatel majka napsal: > > Napsala jsem mu, ozvu se s výsledkem. > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 15:42, Tom Ka wrote: >> >> Takze zatim jsem pro at to nechava, ze se k tomu pozdeji dostaneme a >> jednak se

[talk-cz] OsmHiCheck - silnicni znaceni vs rozcestniky

Ahoj, jak prochazim postupne vsechny fotky ve Fody a upravuju metainformace (vetsinou tagy a ref), tak se na mapce chybnych rozcestniku (vystup OsmHiCheck) objevuji nenafocene rozcestniky pro mista, kde je fotka oznacena jako 'znaceni' ale v OSM je na danem miste rozcestnik. Priklad:

Re: [talk-cz] path nebo footway?

-- Původní e-mail -- Od: Pavel Pilát Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 25. 3. 2019 22:06:25 Předmět: Re: [talk-cz] path nebo footway? " Jo, path chápu taky jako vyšlapanou pěšinu... Highway=service mě napadla též, ale přišlo mi divné mít desetimetrovou service mezi

[talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 451

Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 451 týdeníku WeeklyOSM: https://weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/11622 * Deklarace práv a majitele. * Stínování a vrstevnice na freemap.sk. * Směrnice EU o autorském právu. * OSM Carto a leisure=common. * Jištěné horské cesty v Alpách. * Mapování solárních panelů. * OSM v Google

[Talk-it] Ma questa mappa non è la nostra?

Ho trovato un sito che vende mappe, anche graficamente molto curate, e dichiara di usare i dati Osm. A parte la dichiarazione nelle Faq, non c'è traccia della attribuzione nelle stampe di esempio. https://www.mapdesign.com/faq-questions/mapdesign/ A chi si fa una segnalazione, Martin? Esiste

Re: [talk-cz] logo komunity OSM CZ a logo spolku OSM CR

Ahoj, casu uz ubehlo snad dostatek, nove reakce zadne, takze vzhledem k vysledku hlasovani na https://doodle.com/poll/xn2da4bh6bauzy8x a zadnym reakcim proti zde na mail listu prohlasuju vysledek za jednoznacny. Stavajici logo pouzivane ceskou komunitou OSM bude i oficialni logo spolku OSM ČR

Re: [OSM-talk] HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

For example https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/68527117 changed just one feature, there were about 20 other changes all in the same city, maybe the script has run it's course now I don't know, it's just lots of small changesets clog up osmcha making it harder to skip over them in bulk. On Tue,