Re: [OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

2020-12-08 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Dec 8, 2020, 18:41 by r...@technomancy.org: > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, at 09:43, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > >> Can you give an example of something that would follow >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice >> and still would not fulfill ODBL? >> > > What is and isn'

Re: [OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

2020-12-08 Thread Christoph Hormann
> Rory McCann hat am 08.12.2020 18:41 geschrieben: > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, at 09:43, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > > Can you give an example of something that would follow > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice > > and still would not fulfill ODBL? > > What

Re: [OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

2020-12-08 Thread Rory McCann
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, at 09:43, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > Can you give an example of something that would follow > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice > and still would not fulfill ODBL? What is and isn't allowed by the ODbL can (I think) only be answered by a

Re: [OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

2020-12-08 Thread Rory McCann
Yes, fundamentally, you're 100% correct. The ODbL licence is the thing that matters when it comes to what's legally required. And that says nothing about “device independent pixels” or “javascript popup clicks”, it only refers to the mental state of someone. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of

Re: [OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

2020-12-08 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Can you give an example of something that would follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice and still would not fulfill ODBL? I see no obvious loopholes there. Dec 7, 2020, 22:57 by r...@technomancy.org: > It's good to see more discussion on this. I like that this doc