Le 28/09/2022 à 18:32, leni a écrit :
Je suis revenu en arrière et je retrouve dans l'onglet 0
Voie sans FANTOIR
CHE GENBOY chemin de genboy
et dans l'onglet 2
320870110M 2021-04-26 CHEM DE JENBOY
Ma mémoire est une traîtresse. Et CHE et CHEM sont bien dans les
Correspond peut-être à cette issue de corruption progressive de la base
de données.
https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-frontend/issues/401
Le 26/09/2022 à 22:55, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit :
Salut, ça c'est quand le JSON généré est vide, typiquement quand
l'erreur a disparu.
Le 27/09/2022 à 13:30, leni a écrit :
Le 27/09/2022 à 12:36, deuzeffe a écrit :
Le 26/09/2022 à 19:46, Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit :
Si tu combines l'orthographe de la BAN (avec un G plutôt qu'un J) et
un ref:FR:FANTOIR, ça devrait tout réconcilier, le contenu OSM
faisant le lien
Yep you'll reach Victorian and Australian mappers better on talk-au as some
might not join the global talk list ->
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au.
I'll echo other's comments here, if you are planning or have done the
conflation I'd suggest sharing those results so the community
Hi Rob,Given you are in Australia I would try the talk AU list as well. Maybe also the discord channels as there are a few Ozzie folks there in the Oceania channel with lots of transport experience. Cheers - Phil(On the phone so apologies for any typos)On 28 Sep 2022, at 6:36 pm, rob potter
Thanks for your reply.
I have read the guidelines.
I'm in Victoria, Australia
Rob
On Wed, 28 Sept 2022, 18:07 Eugene Alvin Villar, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I work for the state transport department
>>
>
> Sorry if I missed this somewhere, but which state and which country?
> Depending on the answer,
Hi,
I work for the state transport department
>
Sorry if I missed this somewhere, but which state and which country?
Depending on the answer, there might be a local community that can help and
provide guidance as well with the conflation/import process.
Thanks,
Eugene
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at
Hello,
Le 28.09.22 à 09:18, rob potter a écrit :
My initial thought was extract current, match data location, enrich what
stops.txt has then create all new and remove existing as final step.
no :) keep the historic, no need to delete-create again.
a better workflow :
extract current
match
Welcome to osm! Regarding the "remove existing as final step": we generally
expect people to conflate new data with existing data, so you should not
remove the existing ones, but enrich them (including position acuracy if
possible) with your data, and only create new objects for things that
Hi,
I work for the state transport department and we are looking to become an
active member of the community and as a first dataset we have focused on is
our public transport stops, bus and tram initially and then stations.
I would like your advice on how to achieve the outcome.
There are a
10 matches
Mail list logo