Marc_marc via talk writes:
> Le 18.10.24 à 01:50, Greg Troxel a écrit :
>> there is a typical "I am armchair mapping and if I can't armchair
>> fix it the note should not be open" apparent underlying attitude.
>
> juste add #survey and this case
That doesn't really address the issue, which is th
Le 18.10.24 à 01:50, Greg Troxel a écrit :
there is a typical "I am armchair mapping and if I can't armchair
fix it the note should not be open" apparent underlying attitude.
juste add #survey and this case
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.
Frederik Ramm writes:
> (b) mappers could also mark notes "as read" for themselves. That would
> allow a much better collaborative approach to notes.
This would be great, and probably not so hard. Basically, clicking
"read" on a note would:
refrain from showing that note (when fetched as tha
Florian Lohoff via talk writes:
> There is a loud vocal minority which insist on notes be only used
> for "Non OSM users reporting issues on the map" and when digging into
> that its ALWAYS that the minority has the issue of trying to tidy up
> the map of notes as they have no clue about tools av
Hola,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 11:48:51AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can see how someone's workflow includes "look at all new notes in my area"
> and if they don't know about the more sophisticated note viewers they will
> simply look at the OSM website where they are shown *all* not
Hi,
I can see how someone's workflow includes "look at all new notes in my
area" and if they don't know about the more sophisticated note viewers
they will simply look at the OSM website where they are shown *all*
notes - and then despair because they click on the same thing again that
has be
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> What is the correct escalation when an armchair mapper insists on
> repeatedly closing a note which is not resolved?
>
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3914036
>
> The object in question, a cemetery, was /partly/ armchair
7 matches
Mail list logo
