Hi,

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> What is the correct escalation when an armchair mapper insists on
> repeatedly closing a note which is not resolved?
> 
>    https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3914036
> 
> The object in question, a cemetery, was /partly/ armchair mapped using
> aerial imagery, but it is not possible from that imagery to see the
> full extent of the cemetery (which is partially visible in some
> non-free media, and covers more than the mapped object).

The problem comes up over and over again as there are parties which 
believe their way of working with notes the is the one and only.

There is whatsoever no description on what purpose Notes have, or should
be used for.

For me a high level generic view on notes is:

"Communication exchange for a specific location on the map" 

For the oldtimers - A mailinglist bound to a point on the map. So 
we may use it for - tadaa - Communication. 

So i am also using notes for long time discussions of a certain
construction works, new construction areas.

I regularly feed them with new publications about the progress of
construction work etc.

There is a loud vocal minority which insist on notes be only used
for "Non OSM users reporting issues on the map" and when digging into
that its ALWAYS that the minority has the issue of trying to tidy up
the map of notes as they have no clue about tools available.

I dont care how many notes in my area are open. I do get a mail within
10 Minutes of any event in any note in the area - There are RSS Feeds
available which can be converted to emails. So easy to solve notes
are typically fixed within 30 Minutes.


Getting to this specific - I dont think opening a new note for the left
over work will help. It just pouring oil into the flames.
Getting more people into the discussion will often help pushing back a
bit on mappers trying to push their individual view.

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                                                     f...@zz.de
  Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to