On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:43:46PM +0200, marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I don't like to simply assume 0km/h = infinite delay for a traffic
jam and like 3 km/h for "slow moving traffic".
How about using a fraction instead of a fixed value? E.g. 1/4 for slow
moving and 1/10 (or even 1/10
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:17:46AM +0530, ??? ??? (vikas yadav) wrote:
where is a local language being set for a country or a region?
It isn't at all. The software doesn't know which language "name" is in,
only the mapper does.
CU Sascha
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:14:21PM +, ?var Arnfj?r? Bjarmason wrote:
* Most have the common English name in the name= field, e.g. Germany
and Andorra
At least for Germany, this has already been fixed on 2008-12-04.
name=* (without a language code) should be the name in the local
language.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:12:33PM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
[latin names for medical doctors]
There's no hope of ever introducing these as tags, as they will be
misspelled about 150% of the time.
Why not? :-|
Just add those as (translated) presets to the editors and be done with
it.
If yo
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:02:17PM +, Peter Miller wrote:
There is not however a problem as far as I know in people collecting
their own timetable information from printed material and entering it
into a common DV.
I haven't collected anything yet since I fear the data might be
protected
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:42:17PM +0100, Till Harbaum / Lists wrote:
Geocaching.com recently completely deleted that cache antry as they
claim that it forces you to use a certain
software (a web browser!!!) and a certain web service.
If your geocache is inside a german-speaking country (*), yo
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 11:34:37AM +0100, Tordanik wrote:
Personally, I'd agree if my contributions were bot-changed in cases
like
this, but there are people who wouldn't. Maybe it is possible to set
up
an opt-in bot that only "updates" tagging of those users who have put
themselves on a list
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:52:57PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
That depends on the state (Bundesland). So there cannot be a global
default, only a local one.
I am just curious: which Bundesländer do typically allow motorcars on
tracks?
Sorry, don't know that off the top of my head, but one was
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:04:06PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
In Germany (Switzerland and Austria as well?) there are probably a
very low fraction of tracks on which motorcars are allowed.
That depends on the state (Bundesland). So there cannot be a global
default, only a local one.
CU Sasch
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 02:38:05PM +, James Stewart wrote:
Hi, I am a contributor to the map,but also work in the University in
Edinburgh. I have been talking to the people who run the MSc in GIS,
they have 140 students, and have to propose potential dissertation
projects.
Most of the s
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 06:40:12PM +0100, Tristan Scott wrote:
* Common mobile station on a bridge - on a way which has no relation
to the
direction of enforcement
In that case, a relation (no pun intended) would be better.
* On a crossroads/traffic signals (red light camera) where two ways
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 02:58:48PM +, Hendrik T. Voelker wrote:
To get something done, one has to create a Java class that described
the bot.
No, please, no!
I have been programming in many different languages (at least one per
family, i.e. iterative, functional, i+OOP, f+OOP) for about 20
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 09:23:13AM +0200, vegard wrote:
And for the only semi-technical argument that you break something that
can't be repaired: I have *never* ever placed a reply-to to something
other than my from-adress, and expected it to work, without *also*
stating explicitly at the end of
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:58:48AM +0200, bvh wrote:
Well, and it breaks my expectation of what reply means in the context
of
a public discussion. Should you have different expectations, see the
documentation of your mail client (hint : ignore_list_reply_to)
This thread is going nowhere, so let
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Christopher Woods wrote:
So for lists such as the BBC Backstage Majordomo list (which used to
behave
in the way this list currently does, but now puts in the appropriate
list
address when you hit Reply), are you saying that they've in fact
bodged the
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 01:39:33PM -0500, Lance Dyas wrote:
The default responder to public conversation venues
needs to be to just that ...
There's no way OSM could change that default, it's up to your MUA
vendor. The buttons you're currently using are "reply" (with an implied
"to author") a
(Resend because of wrong sender address)
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 05:35:17PM +0100, Christopher Woods wrote:
BTW - I hope you can even _read_ this mail because it's PGP/MIME
signed).
Quite legible ;) Outlook copes far better than I think some give it
credit
for!
I added that sentence because s
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 04:56:22PM +0100, Christopher Woods wrote:
It seems a little 'unnatural' to me,
To me it's absolutely natural. If I want to reach (only) the author, I
use "reply". When I want to reach everyone who wrote or got the mail, I
use "reply to all". That's exactly what I would
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:26:49PM +0100, Gervase Markham wrote:
What do people think?
As I've already expressed in other threads: IMO that's the way to go.
CU Sascha
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
19 matches
Mail list logo
