ith_other_.22free.22_licences.3F)
or the authors are willing to relicense it under CC-by-SA.
--
--
Civilingeniør ph.d. Claus Hindsgaul
Edvard Thomsens Vej 19, 5. th
DK-2300 KBH S
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ions. But I have tried to show
that micromapping streets into fragments also leads to loss of information,
and why I think that in some cases this loss is more severe than with
metamapping.
Our map will always be "wrong" in some respects. Live with it, but be aware
of it. Only then wil
ecessary to describe significant information. My first post in this
thread lists the talk-dk concensus of such exceptions for bicycle tracks.
In another environment (other project, maybe future OSM), the conclusion may
be very different. A potential future "everything is an area" approach will
best and most operative map description.
Claus
--
--
Civilingeniør ph.d. Claus Hindsgaul
Edvard Thomsens Vej 19, 5. th
DK-2300 KBH S
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
prove the implementation of their future
and former contributions based on insights from the community.
We should not dictate removing existing ways, but neither should we forbid
improving the representation where applicable, even if this involves
conversion of
ly passed by a bicycle (a curb is regarded as
easily passed).
- distances where the bicycle track has a significant distance to the
road side (~ >5 meter)
- distances where permitted traffic directions of different vehicles can
not otherwise be correctly described (this bullet c
6 matches
Mail list logo
