Hi everybody,
I prefer a single/global DWG, which deals with conflicts. To my mind a
global authority is necessary to deal with several cases. Eg.
boundary-disputes, language-disputes of names, global vandalism and so
on. "Local DWG" wont be that objective in some cases and/or it's not
clear
I think a Software should explain their general functionality itselfand
josm does this.But of course you can't explain every functionality by
itself because this function is mainly used by some experts. In these
cases its much better to have a wiki-documentation then only source code.
Henning
Maybe it is supported by a special wheelchair-editor?
In general I think the meanings of both tagings are different.
amenity=toilets => there is a single toilet
wheelchair:toilet=yes => there is another amenity, shop, whatever, which
offers a toilet.
Henning
Am 08.06.2013 02:14, schrieb And
Hi,
maybe a little bit. For remote-mappers it's a good hint, if objects
doesn't fit to imagery.
Henning
Am 21.05.2013 13:26, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
But in the end I think this whole source thing is completely
overestimated.
___
talk mailin
Am 03.05.2013 23:08, schrieb andrzej zaborowski:
On 3 May 2013 22:58, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 03.05.2013 22:12, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
The consensus was that--at least for place relations which are the
target of the said property--OSM relation IDs are stable enough and any
changes in IDs c
Hi,
I like the Attribution Mark, but I think one point is missing: The link
to the wiki-contributors-page.
Henning
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Am 28.12.2012 10:47, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
I've added an auto-increment facility to JOSM's address preset dialog.
It's kind of experimental, and included in josm-latest as of a few
hours ago; happy to hear feedback on that.
Hi
There was already a HouseNumberTaggingTool for josm, which has an
Am 26.11.2012 14:06, schrieb Joseph Reeves:
>I think crowdsourced is accurate.
Playing Devil's Advocate, "crowdsourced" isn't appropriate for large
swathes of OSM data: Europe, for example, is dominated by imported,
not crowdsourced, CORINE data.
I think imported data isn't a question of crowe
Hi,
because of Operation Cowboy many users will become into contact with
TIGER-tags and don't really now ho to deal with them.
There are:
tiger:cfcc
tiger:county
tiger:name_base
tiger:name_direction_suffix
tiger:name_direction_prefix
tiger:name_type
tiger:reviewed
tiger:seperated
tiger:source
Just a question: If I filter all buildings with cadastre-source out of
an osm-planet and publish this extract under ODbL it is illegal?
If so, this is a very problematic thing. It should be allowed, to do
anything that ODbL-license (and also cc-by-sa license did this before)
allows me to do with
10 matches
Mail list logo
