Gregory wrote:
Ah, I hadn't seen http://openbusmap.org/ / http://www.öpnvkarte.de/
http://www.xn--pnvkarte-m4a.de/ before.
It looks cool and I sometimes want to know the route the buses take (in
a non-schematic way). Just a quick look of my parents place and I've
spotted two routes that are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
courtland.yoc...@mindspring.com wrote:
I've been thinking a bit about this from a very different perspective - that
of parks and other open public areas where you might not have a chance to
walk the perimeter ... for instance, you've a dog who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Williams wrote:
So, 24 hours until the Basildon Mapping party.
Anyone know the ratio of miles of residential street:head of population?
Basildon has about 100,000 population at present 3 of us are going to
map the whole town tomorrow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Phil James wrote:
Thanks for that, but bearing in mind I am not a programmer, how does it
help me? :-\
I don't know the ID for any tracks there may or may not be in the area i
(may) want to map, and I can't find a way in OSM to reveal any GPS
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Roy Wallace wrote:
Regarding search - ideally, I think the user should be able to say
that they want to eat a t-bone steak in mood lighting for under $20
less than 30min drive away
Whoa, that would be the killer app! Go out for cheap drinks with some
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
[]
Also, I think I have found one place where liam123 actually did
something good (but I reverted it nonetheless). There is a footway that
goes right across Cumberland drive here in Landon:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28277588
Which liam123 had fixed
Peter Miller wrote:
On 7 Sep 2009, at 00:00, Frankie Roberto wrote:
Thomas wrote:
I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the remaining
NaPTAN counties that have been requested.
I'll probably do two or three at a time, following the list
alphabetically,
Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 Sep 2009, at 21:00, Mark Williams wrote:
[]
When I voted for Essex I had hoped that all of Essex might turn up,
but as far as I can see it's excluded Thurrock, a little unitary
authority in the S.W. corner - which is, naturally, the bit I wanted...
To be clear
Thomas Wood wrote:
[]
Regarding remaining counties, Essex is definitely a priority, we may
as well just upload the remaining counties as and when we can.
(Which'll probably be when the new dev server is up with a sane python
environment)
Good, thanks for that - I am hoping to go round my
One month to go to the Basildon Mapping Party!
I've meant to do this for some time, and have now made plans to move
away from the area, so it's now or never. The 26-27th September looks
clear in the OSM diary.
Basildon is one major cause of Essex looking a bit short in the
Completeness Map,
Peter Miller wrote:
On 7 Aug 2009, at 08:02, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 7 Aug 2009, at 00:06, Mark Williams wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
This is the A13 and it in the ncn13 relation which I think is wrong
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/23406798
Any thoughts? Anyone fancy
Stephan Plepelits wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:54:01PM -0700, Joseph Scanlan wrote:
What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be
commercial or retail.
For the area of the hotel:
amenity=hotel
And for the hotel itself:
amenity=hotel, building=yes
(For
Peter Miller wrote:
This is the A13 and it in the ncn13 relation which I think is wrong
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/23406798
Any thoughts? Anyone fancy following it up?
Actually no, the NCN13 route _IS_ down the A13! Bizarre but true..
It skips off for the flyover at Gallows
Liz wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Roy Wallace wrote:
My main point is that when there is a maximum height under a way,
this should be tagged as an attribute of that way, not of the ways
that pass under it.
Here I cannot agree
When I travel over the bridge I am not interested in the maximum
Greg Stark wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Steve Hillst...@nexusuk.org wrote:
1. It is one way in the appropriate direction (clockwise in the UK)
2. All the roads leave/join the outside of the loop (*)
3. It generally isn't very built-up in the middle (**)
4. It has a reasonably
Chris Fleming wrote:
On 21/07/09 16:39, Mark Williams wrote:
My 2p;
He has been very active around my area and I have had to put in some
work righting wrongs; there are more out there than I have fixed I
believe the original was better than the fixed version in some cases.
Although some
Peter Miller wrote:
On 22 Jul 2009, at 15:18, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
Without going through every edit in the changeset it will be hard to
determine. If we do have to go through every changeset then we
might as well
Peter Miller wrote:
On 19 Jul 2009, at 23:02, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Peter Miller wrote:
We really need some better tools for reverting this sort of
nonsense and a way of patrolling the edits of new contributors .
This isn't a discussion for talk-gb really, but possibly it is a
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
For example, for public footpaths are you including all
highway=footway/footway=yes ways, or are you using the slowly
increasingly used tag that I read about somewhere of
designation=public_footpath?
As stated in my original message, highway=footway/foot=yes are *not*
Matías Iturburu wrote:
Hello list. Newbie here.
I work for a small press plublishing shop in my city, for a number of
years we have been developing and selling the most complete map of the
city and towns nearby, being the de-facto reference for all the
citizens, bus and taxi drivers, as
Peter Childs wrote:
2009/6/1 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
I'm tempted, but half the point is that we need to stop thinking that
the IoW is mapped, without addresses or turn restrictions there's a
long way to go.
On 1 Jun 2009, at 10:53, Steve Chilton wrote:
Steve
I would be very
I'm in if the date suits.
Mark
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Yay, that'd be a great idea.
Shaun
On 30 May 2009, at 15:53, SteveC wrote:
Remember how awesome the wales mapping weekend was last year?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welsh_Mapping_Party_Weekend
Remember the Isle of
Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 23 Mar 2009, at 19:14, Andrew M. Bishop wrote:
a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk (Andrew M. Bishop) writes:
I decided that what would be fun to implement is a routing algorithm
that can find the best (shortest or quickest) route between any two
OSM highway nodes. I know
As I undestand it, a freeway is a highway that has a centre island divide
BUT does not have stop streets and robots at intersections, rather it has
on-off ramps and bridges.
This makes them qualify for a blue stripe!
Regards,
Mark
- Original Message -
From: brendan barrett
Is there any consensus regarding the use of the 'name=*' tag as far as
highways/motorways are concerned?
Example: the stretch of N3 between Buccleuch interchange and the Elands
interchange is called the Eastern Bypass. Do we tag as 'name=Eastern Bypass'
and 'ref=N3'?
Mark
Simon Ward wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:47:26AM +0100, vegard wrote:
The online th and mapnik layers are the showcases for OSM for outsiders.
The one thing that can impress people, is the level of detail we get. So I
say it's good to have a layer with as much detail as possible.
or a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tordanik wrote:
Nic Roets schrieb:
According to the wiki redirects, barrier=gate is replacing highway=gate.
According to tagwatch, the latter is 10 times more popular than the former.
Is the community OK with this ?
If yes, why aren't we running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Browet wrote:
It's fairly standard usage, you see a doctor at the doctors, a butcher
runs the butchers. There should really be an apostrophe in there I
think, ie: the butcher's shop, the doctor's surgery. But that's not
does an M road become secondary -
M20?, M15?, M50?
For example, what would the M39 (Chloorkop Road) be? It is a double road which
is the main link between Tembisa/Kempton Park and Midrand. Yet the M16 through
Edenvale runs through suburbs...
Regards,
Mark Williams
Technical Manager
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
On Mon, October 20, 2008 10:52, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Are there any applications (on linux preferably) that use
OpenStreetMap maps and give standard GPS routing functions like
commercial car GPS units?
Navit, GPSdrive, gosmore. You can also put OSM data into just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dermot McNally wrote:
2008/10/5 Ed Loach [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
30mph. If we had stayed with assumed country-specific units then the tagging
would have been more consistent, easier for the user to tag, and not require
a conversion to a random number
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Philip Homburg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[]
Step 1) Write OSM bot
Step 2) Write OSM Wiki vote rigging bot
Step 3) Propose bot
Step 4) Rig vote
Step 5) Run OSM bot all the while pointing at the
Matthew Flint wrote:
Deal all,
I'd like to propose a new tag, historic=stocks. Stocks are devices
used in medieval times for public humiliation and corporal punishment,
and are still to be found (but not used, alas!) around the UK.
I would welcome comments on the Proposed Features page:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
80n wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 25.09.2008, at 12:53, sergio sevillano wrote:
with JOSM i can zoom and put very close independent paths not
touching each other making them practicaly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On 01-Sep-08, at 1:47 AM, leblatt wrote:
No big deal, but when I hit « reply » on a talk@openstreetmap.org
message, it replies to the message originator, not the list. I have
to hit “reply all”, and remove the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Groom wrote:
When tagging ferry routes is anyone tagging ferry speed, and if so do you
simply add maxspeed = ?? to thr route?
david
There was a recent discussion on the routing list about this - iirc we
agreed to use a (low) assumed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karl Newman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Mark Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robin paulson wrote:
Rory McCann wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
What's current tagging best practice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robin paulson wrote:
Rory McCann wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
What's current tagging best practice with things which are to the left
or the right of a way (e.g. bus stops)?
A nearly-approved proposal for a canal-side object has been objected to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Groom wrote:
Looking at some of the relevant ways it certainly is a mess, as pointed out
by Dermot Mcnally see
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2008-August/028661.html
No one replied on list to his post.
I did - I think -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am experimenting with making Garmin compatible maps, mkgmap and sendmap
do just fine and I was suprised just how easy it is
I do like mkgmap...
however I have a few comments/questions.
1) Is it possible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Hughes wrote:
Tordanik wrote:
When opening openstreetmap.org, the general page displays properly,
including zoom display, ruler, permalink and layer selector. The map,
however, remains plain white. No errors in javascript console, cursor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
natural=marsh?
(from Map Features)
I would expect to find coastline on the open-sea border of this.
Mark
Mike Collinson wrote:
I agree with Stephen's comments and add that I follow the rule if in doubt,
map it as land since we don't have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
wer-ist-roger wrote:
Am Donnerstag 26 Juni 2008 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
* Another hypothesis is that more complete areas of OSM will
have a higher level of edit activity.
Then there are those who say that an area that's complete doesn't
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
On Sunday 08 Jun 2008 22:35, you wrote:
yes! I do hate it,. but not because I don't regret walking or being
outside,
Same with me too, though I might have gone somewhere else if I'd known! Guess
the lesson is to make sure you know what the others in your area are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Chadwick (mailing lists) wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Clinic can apply to other medical folks, such as chiropodists and
physiotherapists too.
And physical rehabilitation, dementia care, psychiatric counseling...
the list might be quite a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Chadwick (mailing lists) wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Clinic can apply to other medical folks, such as chiropodists and
physiotherapists too.
And physical rehabilitation, dementia care, psychiatric counseling...
the list might be quite a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Mark Williams wrote:
[snip]
On a slightly related issue, I'll be interested to see how
changesets, and the easier ability to monitor an area, affect this.
0.6b went live on 15th January, 0.8a on 30th March, so
This is another Potlatch grumble - but it's not really Potlatch, it's
the internet.
I just found a whole lot (really, a lot) of overlapping ways with some
really old data (Potlatch alpha before) buried under new versions
from Potlatch v0.6a 0.8 - for instance, the M25 Junction 30 had 3
Dermot McNally wrote:
2008/5/27 Rory McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There's a FAQ entry that says that you should use ; as a value separator
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Faq#What_shall_I_do_for_roads_that_have_multiple_values_for_a_tag.3F).
Is this offical OSM policy? If so then,
Steve Hill wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Robin Paulson wrote:
maybe i'll do it myself; some transparent png laid over the top of the
osm tiles can't be so difficult
Have a look at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Contours
This tells you how contour rendering has been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Wagner wrote:
Hi there
I created a proposed feature called watermill. It is in category
man_made like windmills are too.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Watermill
I think there is not much misunderstandable
Sfan00 wrote:
Hi,
You may have noticed some of my recent
contributions in respect of
fields nr Bourne End and Bovingdon in
Hertfordshire, UK.
Can I make a polite request that
alongside the many other ongoing
pojects, that an effort be
made to mark land-use based on available
maning sambale wrote:
http://ajr.hopto.org/osm/pr/OSMFlyer-English.pdf
Acrobat says Error processing page ... (109)
maning
I'd re-download it, mine is both technically fine very good - Thanks
to both!
I'm taking it to Wales today..
Mark
___
Dave Hansen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 17:31 +, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
I vaguely remember months ago when the coastline checker at
http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/coastlines.html was quite new, someone
[]
You can download a custom JOSM and validator .jar here:
Lars Aronsson wrote:
[some serious stuff]
Also, returning to cycle lanes, the secondary road
Malmslättsvägen is now marked with cycleway=lane, but this doesn't
show on the map here. And how can I indicate that this bus stop
is only on the southern side of the street (buses going east)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Robinson wrote:
On 26/03/2008, Mark Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars Aronsson wrote:
[some serious stuff]
Also, returning to cycle lanes, the secondary road
Malmslättsvägen is now marked with cycleway=lane, but this doesn't
Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
Gregory Williams wrote:
Sent: 29 February 2008 3:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] London to Brighton Bike Ride - registration
Don't worry! I took a trace last year:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] osmosis]$ java -mx1024m -jar osmosis.jar --read-xml
file=~/Desktop/europe.osm.bz2 --bounding-polygon file=~/geo/gb-irl.poly
--write-xml file=UK.osm
failed as below on Mandriva 2008
That's yesterday's europe, svn's gb-irl.poly, osmosis 0.24
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lester Caine wrote:
Mark Williams wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lester Caine wrote:
J.D. Schmidt wrote:
Lester Caine skrev:
[big snip]
LOGICALLY - there should never have been a problem created. A POI element
should
Stephen Hope wrote:
This would be good. But even better, let me select a portion of a
track log and upload it. My track logs tend to be a nightmarish
tangle, with possibly hours of stuff before, after and during the
interesting bits. I can use them because I was there, and know where
I
80n wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Mark Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stephen Hope wrote:
This would be good. But even better, let me select a portion of a
track log and upload it. My track logs tend to be a nightmarish
tangle, with possibly hours of stuff before, after
OJ W wrote:
The OSM cartoon has apparently become CC now:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Image:Openstreetmap_cartoon.jpg
- would anyone like to write a caption, for use as the easter-week featured
image?
Oh Ye'll tak the High Road,
I'll tak the Low Road,
I'll have mapped
Original Message
Subject:Re: [Talk-GB] Conflicting tagging of london undergound stations
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:13:30 +0100
From: Mark Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Jonathan Bennett wrote:
Steve Coast wrote:
That burning question - if you have a GPS and a dashboard which lets
it slide off when you turn a corner - what do you do?
Maybe blu tak?
Works perfectly for me. Use many small blobs rather than one big one,
though.
Jono
Be
64 matches
Mail list logo
