n OSM). I'll resume the discussion soon.
Regards
Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
also be possible to create a "routable" property for
Wikibase (data items).
I kindly ask you to reconsider your decision, to not block opinions
that differ from yours and to listen more to the community.
Best regards
Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hi Mateusz,
Thanks for your reply!
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 20:52, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> I know that it should be fairly easy to find object with crossing=zebra
> tag last edited by this user.
This gives me over 800 results. I hoped that i don't have to look
through all of them, but maybe
=traffic_signals to crossing=zebra in a Maproulette.)
Regards
Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
o rendered:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38707921
(Note that the incorrect boundary was already rendered before my
recent edit to the correct one.)
Any idea where that ghost boundary might come from?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards
Markus
PS: I hope that this is the right mai
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 13:23, Jem wrote:
>
> I agree. And a supplementary question... would you also add a no-left-turn
> restriction from https://osm.org/way/581948344 at
> https://osm.org/node/5680879176? I would, and have done in the past. But to
> be honest, I'm not sure if a turn like that
d offramp are mapped as motorway_link.
+1. I'd also delete the descriptions like Tonkin Highway Southbound
Ramp off to Albany Highway in the name tag unless the ramps are signed
like that on site.
> > * -35.3409195, 149.1616891
>
> Ways 77001149 and 77
ipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_state#Declarative_theory
Regards
Markus
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 13:43, Vladimir Agafonkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:52 PM Guillaume Rischard
> wrote:
>>
>> The on-the-ground rule has served us well on disputed borders: there is no
&
tch at all with what i see on the aerial imagery. (See Esri, which
seems to have the best imagery.) I'd suggest to delete and redraw
them.
- Buildings glued to highways
- Highways running through buildings
- Overlapping buildings
Regards
Markus
_
nyway, many thanks to all OSM Carto developers, to all mappers and to
all the others who make this great project possible and improve it!
Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Am 16.02.16, 05:55:32 CET schrieb Gerd Petermann:
> Hi Markus,
>
> access=destination doesn't mean that residents cannot reach their home,
But it means bikers and pedestrians cannot be routed through, but will
be routed around that street, which wouldn't be necessary if
motor_
Hi Gerd,
Am 15.02.16, 21:29:59 CET schrieb Gerd Petermann:
> Hi Markus,
>
> I agree that forestry should be handled like agricultural, I'll
> try to create a patch for that.
Thank you.
> Reg. delivery I am a bit unsure because it seems that this this
> value is ver
Am 15.02.16, 07:57:26 CET schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:13:45 +0100
> Markus Heidelberg wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > last week after missing the exit on a highway=motorway, a Garmin Nüvi
> > 300 with a Lambertus map tried to turn throu
in the whole tree.
access=forestry should probably be handled like access=agricultural.
Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ngly?
Additional info on an already existing note at the concerned location
(in German):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/238113
Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
rch
results has to do an evaluation of the result set returned and make a
judgment call to select the one he's actually interested in.
/Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Thanks for fixing it, but there's one problem remaining. There's a
quite visible gap in rendering when moving from a highway+railway to a
highway+railway+bridge. E.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=59.33140&mlon=18.09368#map=19/59.33140/18.09368
/Markus
On 10 August 2014 1
Hi
I just noticed a couple of big changes in how the map is rendered
- highway=platform is no longer rendered
- railway=tram is no longer rendered if it shares a way with highway=*
Are these bugs or a deliberate change?
/Markus
___
talk mailing list
Hi,
a feedback menu option was added to the osm-icons.org wiki.
This is the direct link to the feedback wiki page:
http://osm-icons.org/wiki/Public:Main .
Cheers Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
the related metadata.
The icon set can be downloaded here: http://osm-icons.org
Thank you very much in advance for your feedback!
Cheers Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I think you're overlooking a key strength with the osm database, that
all the map features are integrated, e.g. if a kiosk is mapped to be
three meters to the left of the entrance to the building, and that is
also the ground truth, then you have that fact of th
org/wiki/Keypad-Mapper_3%5B/url%5D>
Have fun with this new version!
Pls add your ideas and whishes to the Keypad-Mapper wiki page.
Cheers Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ontainer for compiling the
outcome of the discussion.
Thanks a lot for supporting Keypad-Mapper 3!
Cheers
Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
is the link for the Keypad-Mapper 3 user template which can be used
for your own OSM user profile:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:User_Keypad-Mapper_3
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:User_Keypad-Mapper_3>
Markus
___
talk
bandshell,
nightclub etc that I think should be used
instead of the generic music_venue when applicable.
/Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
t I think it's a better idea to have both
amenity=concert_hall and amenity=music_venue. Of course one could make
the argument that we should only have amenity=sustenance and
amenity=music_venue, but then then we would lose information just for
the sake of
On 22 September 2012 11:30, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
>> > But osmi bundles together all relation
>> > above admin_level=4 (Swedish municipalities are on level 7)
>
> Just for you information in case that might suits your needs :
> h
icipalities are on level 7) and now
people are adding more and more boundary relation for lower level
entities (higher admin_level) which means that there's no longer a
blank area if there's a problem with the municipality but the lower
level entities are ok.
/Markus
and
about ten meter before the intersection it changes also to pedestrian.
Is this a problem with routing engine or with how the street is tagged?
/Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
to say.
About the Data Working Group, where can one find more information
about its activities? It doesn't seem to publish any minutes like the
other working groups do.
Regards
Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
t; function key settings) from one session to the next.
But there's no need to store them on the client, as all users have to
log in the preferences can be stored server-side. Atleast I throw away
all cookies when I close the browser.
/Markus
___
On 5 February 2011 11:56, Ed Avis wrote:
> Richard Mann gmail.com> writes:
>
>>And Brussels should be capital=1
>
> Along with Strasbourg?
It's only the parliament that is expelled to Strasbourg from time to
time. And they are not the one with the real power in EU ;)
___
Anyone read the fine print of the license under which M$ provides the imagery?
/Markus
On 23 November 2010 19:43, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> Grant Slater wrote:
>> Same answer for the Potlatch...
>> http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/1602/how-can-i-use-microsofts
information with it's several subtags? Seems to fit
> perfectly IMHO as a primary tag.
What constitutes a primary tag? How should one know which tags are
considered primary when parsing the OSM database?
Regards
Markus
___
talk mailing list
t
On 12 August 2010 11:18, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
> What can I do I agree to relicense my stuff under ODbL, but I can't
> agree with CT Section 3? I hoped LWG will think about removing it, but
> it seems that relicensing is already started without investigating
> complain about section 3.
On 19 May 2010 10:34, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
>>
>> here is a question from one of my friends,
>> *what linux-based wifi gps phone would you recommend?*
>> any suggestions?
>
> Most free : Openmoko.
> Best market potential : Android
> Best compromise : Maem
t of the things a smart
phone does also. And works great for mapping.
/Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/10/2 Jonathan Bennett :
> Markus Lindholm wrote:
>> Isn't it time that the governing board establishes a tagging council
>> of some sort
>
> See
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_bureaucracy
> for what An
that keys that are not in the official set should be
prefixed with an agreed upon string, e.g.
custom:my_very_own_key=
/Markus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/8/14 Colin Marquardt :
> 2009/8/13 Markus Lindholm :
>> I thought I'd spend some time on adding name:bo (i.e. in Tibetan) tags
>> for places in Tibet. I was thinking of copy-pasting the place names
>> from Wikipedia (guess that's ok), as my knowledge in T
I thought I'd spend some time on adding name:bo (i.e. in Tibetan) tags
for places in Tibet. I was thinking of copy-pasting the place names
from Wikipedia (guess that's ok), as my knowledge in Tibetan is just
as limited as everybody else's. It's just that I can't find a way to
enter Tibetan text. I
the same
> icon for different tags if the developers don't consider the distinction
> relevant for the rendering.
>
Another property that turnstiles have is that usually one can pass in
only one direction. But how that is going to be tagged if a turnstile
is just a node I have no
ut
that or that could revert changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1790341
Regards
Markus a.k.a. Snusmumriken
2009/7/15 Mike Collinson :
> Thanks for looking at this ... I put in most of those buildings. There also
> deletions like the carparks in Centralplan which have b
Ok, what can I do to get the data back?
I contacted the user who made this deletion 24 hours ago, but haven't
heard anything back.
Regards
Markus
2009/7/14 Shaun McDonald :
> The data has gone. It looks like it was this changeset
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/179034
are glitch.
Is there a easy way to get them back, and find out what else might
have gone missing at the same time?
I've been following the area with itoworld.com, but it hasn't reported
any changes. Strange.
Regards
Markus
___
talk mailing
45 matches
Mail list logo
