Hello!
New message, please read <http://www.pcosdietexpert.com/above.php?klvd>
ingalls
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
+1
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I propose to move the "source"-tag from the object space and instead
> suggest it as a changeset tag in iD.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> t
Hello All,
Just finished browsing around the new Digital Public Library of America
site and was pleased to see that they have gone with OSM as their choice of
map. The map can be seen here (http://dp.la/map) and allows one to see
georeferenced material.
Cheers,
ingalls
>would some kind of "meta" OSM database be appropriate?
+1 on this, I guess the challenge would be finding resources to host it.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> > I think this boundaries can be useful, but should b
no longer around so I can remove them! That being said, I am looking
for constructive feedback on removing outdated features not a
mass response of "deleting anything is BAD!"
I hope that clears up my point of view and my aims for this endeavor.
Cheers,
ingalls
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1
o last
edited the way! If the last editor of the way gives me permission, I will
delete the way. That being said, if you are not the last editor of the way
but want the way back as it is still useful, PM me and I will certainly
revert the changeset.
Cheers & happy mapping,
ingalls
On Mo
I'm with everyone who is against adding this to the database although I
agree that a mass edit is not the way to get rid of these. I'll go through
them and contact the individual owners and see about getting as many as
possible removed. If they don't respond after a reasonable time (a month or
two)
It doesn't look like this is an isolated example, there are over a hundred
of these
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary=imagery#overview
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:35 PM, ingalls wrote:
> Hey guys came across a really weird way.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse
Hey guys came across a really weird way.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/104974280
Not sure exactly what it is supposed to represent? Is it showing where bing
has high quality imagery? And secondly can I remove it!
___
talk mailing list
talk@ope
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/iwonapavlov/diary
appears to be a spammer.
Just created an account and started creating diary posts to gambling sites.
Cheers,
Ingalls
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
someone could
read through this -
http://geonb.snb.ca/downloads/documents/geonb_license_e.pdf and give me
their opinion.
Cheers,
ingalls
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Vincent Pottier wrote:
> t it be reverted ?
> Does somebody can do it ?
>
Can you provide a link or a changeset id?
Cheers,
ingalls
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
I second that it should stay brown! There are way to many green objects and
we don't want it confused with the grass tag. My vote would be to play
around with the brown color. I certainly agree that it currently isn't the
best.
Cheers,
ingalls
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Lenn
6137 Looks good for me. I collect a *lot* of addresses simply by walking.
Cheers,
ingalls
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I've made a program that counts how many house numbers someone has
> added. It uses object history, so it should be
Tagging with access:no usually does the trick :)
Just see here for a list of access tags -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access
cheers,
ingalls
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Stan Berka wrote:
> Yesterday, I did navigation to my work place here in Warsaw using Osmand o
> my G2
15 matches
Mail list logo
