Re: [OSM-talk] please for bot quality control

2010-05-04 Thread wynndale
> [i sent this to talk-us earlier, and a member of that list suggested it > was worth broadcasting to a larger audience] > > as i work my way west along the PA/NY border fixing connectivity > problems, i'm suitably impressed by the patches west of > Waverly/NY 17 where the ways are missing, only th

Re: [OSM-talk] Visual map for the blind

2009-10-11 Thread wynndale
> Hello list members, > > starting today there is a visual slippy map displaying map features for > the blind an visually impaired available in a beta testing state: > > http://freenet-homepage.de/rapunzely/OSM/blindmap.html > > Hobby cartographers without visual impairment can now check their > co

Re: [OSM-talk] SteveC should decide

2009-10-02 Thread wynndale
> > Different people can then > experiment with different approaches to produce "consistent" datasets > tailored to their own needs. They don't need to be proprietary - in > fact, given the number of people around here talking about it I'd have > hoped someone would have stepped up and produced a t

Re: [OSM-talk] Vandalism/user error?

2009-09-09 Thread wynndale
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, David Earl wrote: >> On 09/09/2009 00:10, Richard Fairhurst wrote: >> > David Earl wrote: >> >> Richard - why do we still need this mode now you can save in >> >> Potlatch and groups of changes fit much better with changesets >> >> anyway? >> > >> > Lots of people still prefer

Re: [OSM-talk] Accidentally deleted the National Byway cycle route...

2009-09-01 Thread wynndale
> A fellow mapper has kindly informed me that my changeset 2315455 > appears to have deleted all the members from the National Byway cycle > route. > > Unfortunately I am not sure how to revert this changeset; If anyone is > able to revert this for me I would be most grateful. > According to http:/

Re: [OSM-talk] waterway=lock

2009-08-28 Thread wynndale
> On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote: > >> lock=yes >> lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock > > When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will > already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=. > Why would you want to repeat the name of a canal on its individual nodes? I

[OSM-talk] New proposal: Bad data

2009-08-24 Thread wynndale
The new Bad data proposal is a scheme to mark traced aerial photography or maps as out of date or otherwise unreliable so that they can be obscured in editors and users don’t copy details into the OSM database reducing its accuracy. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_data _

Re: [OSM-talk] Korea users

2009-08-08 Thread wynndale
> I've noticed a lot of new data on Korea. > Who is working on Korea and is there a separate email list? > > -- > Jeffrey John Martin > dogs...@gmail.com > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >

Re: [OSM-talk] (no subject)

2009-08-06 Thread wynndale
> Could you please give examples of usage on that page? > > In the main most chains, such as the Tesco supermarket have the tags > shop=supermarket; name=Tesco, which I don't think is compatible with > your idea of having an operator and name tag where you would put the > name of the branch (for e

[OSM-talk] (no subject)

2009-08-04 Thread wynndale
I have put together some thoughts about how you could go about tagging a whole shop chain or similar while making searches for the chain or the type of shop useful. I have put them online in the OSM wiki at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/user:Wynndale/Tagging_branch_networks_(draft) As a bit