Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gervase Markham wrote:
| Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
| It's been proposed by me several times in the past. I think it's
| essential. I don't know of a similar major project that doesn't do some
| kind of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gervase Markham wrote:
| Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
| It's been proposed by me several times in the past. I think it's
| essential. I don't know of a similar major project that doesn't do some
| kind of assignment. Wikipedia is the nearest, but
Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
It's been proposed by me several times in the past. I think it's
essential. I don't know of a similar major project that doesn't do some
kind of assignment. Wikipedia is the nearest, but Wikipedia is a
collection of articles that all stand on their own.
Can you
My apologies but the DBL text seems to be mis-formatted -- probably
as a result of my last wordpress update. It should be fixed now, but
just in case the downloads offer the canonical version.
Thanks!
~Jordan
Mr. Jordan S Hatcher, JD, LLM
jordan at opencontentlawyer dot com
OC Blog:
Jordan S Hatcher wrote:
I'd like to note that, just to clarify, factual data is generally not
copyrightable, and so there would be nothing to assign.
Why is it that we are assuming (and I'm not just saying this to Jordan)
that the individual nodes and ways in OSM are factual data? I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gervase Markham wrote:
| Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
| Long term, we can avoid the ambiguity by making it clear that all data
| belongs to OSM, whoever that is (probably the foundation), then we can
| let the foundation change the license whenever
On 6 Feb 2008, at 12:19, Gervase Markham wrote:
I think it's important to point out that commercial companies
protecting their data do not allow their users to share it, and so
most of their protection is based around this. By allowing others to
share the work freely, you lose many of these
At 09:35 AM 2/5/2008, Rob Myers wrote:
Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
I'm still think that the foundation owns everyone's data already. When
you sign up, it says:
By creating an account, you agree that all work uploaded to
openstreetmap.org and all data created by use of any tools which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Myers wrote:
| Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
|
| I'm still think that the foundation owns everyone's data already. When
| you sign up, it says:
| By creating an account, you agree that all work uploaded to
| openstreetmap.org and all data created by
Le 4 févr. 08 à 19:22, Tom Chance a écrit :
This sounds like a nightmare: I could lose weeks of work because
someone who fails to reply played with Potlatch once for a few
minutes and then vanished.
You have a better idea? :-)
No, but it's a bit scary without having any good idea of the
Hello,
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:47:44 +, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4 Feb 2008, at 13:46, David Earl wrote:
how do we avoid the situation where e.g. someone who disagrees the
new license has run a bot over all of Cambridge to tweak things
(as has indeed
happened to many of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Axel Marquette wrote:
| Le 4 févr. 08 à 19:22, Tom Chance a écrit :
|
| This sounds like a nightmare: I could lose weeks of work because
| someone who fails to reply played with Potlatch once for a few
| minutes and then vanished.
| You have a better
12 matches
Mail list logo
