You should rotate the options randomly and also try some of the
consequences in the questions also
a) Would you like OSM to always be inferior to TeleAtlas and Navteq
and probably die (PD license)
b) Would you like OSM to be the best map on the planet (viral license))
c) This requires more tha
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:21 AM, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) Would you like OSM to always be inferior to TeleAtlas and Navteq
> and probably die (PD license)
> b) Would you like OSM to be the best map on the planet (viral license))
> c) This requires more than 90 seconds thought, please
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Gustav Foseid escribió:
> I am really worried, when I see the chairman of the OSM Foundation making
> these kind of oversimplified statements regardig a complex issue like the
> OSM license. Building a community is much more important than any license,
> and this i
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Gustav Foseid escribió:
>> I am really worried, when I see the chairman of the OSM Foundation making
>> these kind of oversimplified statements regardig a complex issue like the
>> OSM
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philipp Klaus Krause
> Sent: 03 November 2008 09:55
> To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
> Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A really quick poll
>
&g
hello Iván
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Gustav Foseid escribió:
>> I am really worried, when I see the chairman of the OSM Foundation making
>> these kind of oversimplified statements regardig a complex issue like the
>> OSM license. Building a community is much m
> Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A really quick poll
>
> Closing the poll.
>
> The results look like this:
>
> Place no restrictions whatsoever on the use of the map data (Use a
> Public Domain license)
> 41.1% 76
> Ensure that users of the data contrib
7 matches
Mail list logo
