Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT, section 3

2010-11-26 Thread Matthias Julius
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:47:14 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer schrieb: >> There seems to be a substantial number of OSMF members who consider all >> data >> created by individuals to be community-owned, even going so far as to >> accuse >> people who refuse to accept the CT a

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT, section 3

2010-11-25 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer wrote: 3.2. OSMF agrees to inform You of all newly approved licenses if You maintain a valid email address in their registration profile. OSMF agrees not to relicense Your Content to the newly approved licence if You object to the license approval within 6 wee

[OSM-legal-talk] CT, section 3

2010-11-25 Thread Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer
Hi, a few days ago Richard Weait asked for suggestions patches from people who critized CT v. 1.0. I therefore decided to join this mailing list and post a suggestion myself. I am perfectly fine with the ODbL but am unhappy with the CT, because I am not allowed to opt-out of license changes th