Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License review request: Sardinia ad-hoc authorization

2013-11-27 Thread Jonathan Harley
On 26/11/13 21:25, Jukka Rahkonen wrote: Jonathan Harley jon@... writes: On 23/11/13 10:45, Simone Cortesi wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Paul Norman penorman@... wrote: The mentions of the OpenStreetMap Foundation in the document are confusing, as to my knowledge no one from the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License review request: Sardinia ad-hoc authorization

2013-11-26 Thread Jonathan Harley
On 23/11/13 10:45, Simone Cortesi wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: The mentions of the OpenStreetMap Foundation in the document are confusing, as to my knowledge no one from the OSMF is involved in or a party to this agreement, but I don't think that

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License review request: Sardinia ad-hoc authorization

2013-11-26 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
Jonathan Harley jon@... writes: On 23/11/13 10:45, Simone Cortesi wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Paul Norman penorman@... wrote: The mentions of the OpenStreetMap Foundation in the document are confusing, as to my knowledge no one from the OSMF is involved in or a party to

[OSM-legal-talk] License review request: Sardinia ad-hoc authorization

2013-11-23 Thread Paul Norman
sabas88 is proposing an import of some data in Sardinia (http://lists.osm.org/pipermail/imports/2013-November/002370.html) The first three paragraphs appear to be preamble, with the permissions granted in the final paragraph. A user-supplied translation of this paragraph is So, knowing that

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License review request: Sardinia ad-hoc authorization

2013-11-23 Thread Simone Cortesi
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: - contributors to upload some or all of these datasets to the OSM API - the portions or complete datasets uploaded to then be redistributed under the ODbL any copyright holder has the right to re-license on an ad-hoc