Did anybody else read this and also think, Monkey see 'CT', monkey
respond with irrelevant wiki page.?
Steve: Is right, because he stuck to the stated facts.
Nick: Is right because his full statement ended with the line
However I also can't see exactly how the published statement meets this
On 21 June 2011 09:39, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 21 June 2011 05:46, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hang on, here's Nearmap's statement: All such additions or edits
submitted to OSM prior to 17 June 2011 may be held and continue to be
used by OSM under the
Hang on, here's Nearmap's statement: All such additions or edits
submitted to OSM prior to 17 June 2011 may be held and continue to be
used by OSM under the terms in place between OSM and the individual
which submitted the addition or edit at the relevant time.
And here's Nick's interpretation:
2011/6/17 Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com:
The goal of that statement was to allow any contributions that have been
derived from our PhotoMaps under our current licence (which is what imposes
the CC-BY-SA redistribution condition) can remain in the OSM db. Not being
a lawyer, I'm not going to
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
The goal of that statement was to allow any contributions that have been
derived from our PhotoMaps under our current licence (which is what imposes
the CC-BY-SA redistribution condition) can remain in the OSM db. Not being
My understanding is that Nearmap wish all contributions to OSM, by any
mapper who has agreed to the CT, derived from their imagery (before the 17th
June 2011) to be able to be relicenced by OSMF under any licence it (OSMF)
chooses at any time.
However I also can't see exactly how the published
Yes Steve - you're right.
The For Clarity paragraph basically says that contributions from a mapper
who hadn't accepted the CT and were derived from Nearmap prior to June 17th
2011 can stay in the data base and do not have to be deleted.
They give no time limit or OSM-licence limitations on this
On 16 June 2011 14:48, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
That it was drafted, carefully, by a lawyer I do not doubt. But lawyers
draft things on instruction to achieve particular goals. My understanding
from Ben's comment is that one of the goals of nearmap is that derived works
are
2011/6/15 Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com
*
All such additions or edits submitted to OSM prior to 17 June 2011 may be
held and continue to be used by OSM under the terms in place between OSM and
the individual which submitted the addition or edit at the relevant time.
*
I absolutely do
So those guys put out a legal statement and an employee even gave you his
interpretation on this list, which you can cite in court if you want. I think
you're pretty solid and it feels like people are just looking for problems no
matter what is done or said. :-(
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jun
So those guys put out a legal statement and an employee even gave you his
interpretation on this list, which you can cite in court if you want. I think
you're pretty solid and it feels like people are just looking for problems no
matter what is done or said. :-(
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jun
On 16 June 2011 14:48, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
That it was drafted, carefully, by a lawyer I do not doubt. But lawyers
draft things on instruction to achieve particular goals. My understanding
from Ben's comment is that one of the goals of nearmap is that derived works
are
On 15 June 2011 11:56, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:39 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
On 15 June 2011 09:36, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with
On 15 June 2011 09:36, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with apologies for the delay, here is the statement from
NearMap regarding submission of derived works of our PhotoMaps to OSM.
Dear Ben,
+1 Much appreciated, both the statement itself and Ben's efforts to get it.
Mike
On 15/06/2011 03:36, Richard Weait wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Lastben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with apologies for the delay, here is the statement from NearMap
regarding
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with apologies for the delay, here is the statement from NearMap
regarding submission of derived works of our PhotoMaps to OSM.
Dear Ben,
Thank you for providing this clear statement, for NearMap's
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with apologies for the delay, here is the statement from NearMap
regarding submission of derived works of our PhotoMaps to OSM.
Dear Ben,
Thank you for providing this clear statement, for NearMap's
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with apologies for the delay, here is the statement from NearMap
regarding submission of derived works of our PhotoMaps to OSM.
Dear Ben,
Thank you for providing this clear statement, for NearMap's
On 15 June 2011 09:36, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with apologies for the delay, here is the statement from
NearMap regarding submission of derived works of our PhotoMaps to OSM.
Dear Ben,
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:39 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
On 15 June 2011 09:36, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with apologies for the delay, here is the statement from
NearMap regarding
On 15 June 2011 11:56, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:39 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
On 15 June 2011 09:36, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with
21 matches
Mail list logo
