Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] disputed areas

2008-02-10 Thread John McKerrell
On 10 Feb 2008, at 18:09, Jon Stockill wrote: > John McKerrell wrote: > >> I must say, I wondered this earlier, wouldn't this be the simplest >> option or would it lock out too may people? > > One of two things happens: > > 1) You've just blocked a proxy address, resulting in lots of innocent > p

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] disputed areas

2008-02-10 Thread Jon Stockill
John McKerrell wrote: > I must say, I wondered this earlier, wouldn't this be the simplest > option or would it lock out too may people? One of two things happens: 1) You've just blocked a proxy address, resulting in lots of innocent people being unable to edit anything. or 2) The person yo

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] disputed areas

2008-02-10 Thread John McKerrell
On 10 Feb 2008, at 17:43, Andrew MacKinnon wrote: > On Feb 9, 2008 10:36 AM, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Mikel Maron wrote: >>> It's still going on and we need a technical solution, now. >>> Dialogue has >>> not been effective and banning users is not effective. >> >> Banning

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] disputed areas

2008-02-10 Thread Andrew MacKinnon
On Feb 9, 2008 10:36 AM, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mikel Maron wrote: > > It's still going on and we need a technical solution, now. Dialogue has > > not been effective and banning users is not effective. > > Banning users is not effective because they just sign up with new accou

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] disputed areas

2008-02-09 Thread Juan Lucas Dominguez Rubio
16:40 Para: talk@openstreetmap.org Asunto: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] disputed areas On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 04:12:03PM +, Gervase Markham wrote: > > - Private roads and driveways > What, about their presence or absence? Surely whether they are there or > not is a fairly clear fact. They

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] disputed areas

2008-02-09 Thread Gervase Markham
bvh wrote: > Well, I know a situation where there was a dispute over rights of > way over a particular piece of path that got very heated indeed. > Leading even up to 'real life edit wars' (Owner puts up fence, > anonymous destroys fence, owner add dogs, dogs get shot etc...) > I would not be surpr

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] disputed areas

2008-02-09 Thread bvh
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 04:12:03PM +, Gervase Markham wrote: > > - Private roads and driveways > What, about their presence or absence? Surely whether they are there or > not is a fairly clear fact. They can be marked "access=private" to > denote that there's no right of way. Well, I know a