Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Funding of iD Development and Maintenance

2020-08-05 Thread Guillaume Rischard
On 5 Aug 2020, at 12:31, Mateusz Konieczny via osmf-talk wrote: > > Have you reached out to JOSM devs about also supporting their work? Hi Mateusz, Yes, I have told them explicitly and clearly that for us, the door is wide open. During informal conversations in the past, the JOSM people have

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Funding of iD Development and Maintenance

2020-08-05 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Aug 5, 2020, 13:36 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > Am Mi., 5. Aug. 2020 um 12:35 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via osmf-talk <> > osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org> >: > >> >> Especially given that JOSM is used for similar number of edits >> > > > > this is not correct, JOSM accounts for 522 335 46

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Funding of iD Development and Maintenance

2020-08-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Mi., 5. Aug. 2020 um 12:35 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via osmf-talk < osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org>: > Especially given that JOSM is used for similar number of edits > this is not correct, JOSM accounts for 522 335 462 edits in 2020, while iD users have committed 227 706 433 edits, this is

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Funding of iD Development and Maintenance

2020-08-05 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
What is the reason for funding iD and not funding JOSM? Especially given that JOSM is used for similar number of edits and is much more successful at several important points, including developers with significantly higher respect toward mapping community? Is it just result of "He has written up

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Funding of iD Development and Maintenance

2020-08-02 Thread Guillaume Rischard
To nip this one in the bud: No one employed by Mapbox is currently working on iD. Quincy, the current iD maintainer and lead developer, doesn’t and has never worked for Mapbox. Mapbox won’t receive any funding from this. Guillaume > On 2 Aug 2020, at 14:50, JB wrote: > > So, with sarcasm (at

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Funding of iD Development and Maintenance

2020-08-02 Thread Jo
The way I read this, is that there is money that will be used toward advancing the 3 projects and funding is being sought to finance continued development of iD. So I'd say there is a difference. I take it all as good news. Of course, I would also like to see some financial support for JOSM and Ve

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Funding of iD Development and Maintenance

2020-08-02 Thread JB
So, with sarcasm (at least half-)on, and english not being my mothertongue: the osm2pgsql/Nomatim/Potlatch grants were just Troyan horses to enable the OSMF funding of (ex or not ex?) Mapbox developer, with contributors not screaming too loudly? And explaining the iD conflict resolution process