Maybe you should wait some days. There is some activity on the talk
page cause of the Bridge_and_Tunnels Relations proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels
A proper definition of what a relation is may be a good start ;(
I don't see why a
Raphael Studer wrote:
Maybe you should wait some days. There is some activity on the talk
page cause of the Bridge_and_Tunnels Relations proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels
A proper definition of what a relation is may be a good start ;(
Relation should be IN ADDITION to identifying elements that make it up, not as
a replacement which is what is being proposed.
Areas provide physical with details that are missing from routes, but also do
not replace the basic elements such as 'railway and footway' that form part of
the
Raphael Studer wrote:
Does someone care about this proposal?
Yes, sorry, I'll move it to a vote RSN.
Although I'd kind of given up on the whole voting system, given the
antipathy towards it (and, in fact, towards any form of authority) in
certain quarters.
Gerv
Does someone care about this proposal?
Yes, sorry, I'll move it to a vote RSN.
Maybe you should wait some days. There is some activity on the talk
page cause of the Bridge_and_Tunnels Relations proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels
Regards
Raphael Studer wrote:
Does someone care about this proposal?
Yes, sorry, I'll move it to a vote RSN.
Maybe you should wait some days. There is some activity on the talk
page cause of the Bridge_and_Tunnels Relations proposal:
At 11:11 AM 13/05/2008, Raphael Studer wrote:
I've formally written up my Bridge proposal, as mentioned here a week or
two ago:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Bridge
Does someone care about this proposal?
Regards
Rapahel
It seems so:
7 matches
Mail list logo
