The feature is now approved. So let's start mapping mineshafts.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmineshaft
lesi
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
So let's start voting:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mineshaft
lesi
It is planed to close the voting tomorrow. So vote now.
Preliminary result: 7 times approved, 1 time opposed, one fun vote.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mineshaft#Voting
Due to
Lesi writes:
If you think voting is silly, why do you not change the procedure
of approving new features in the wiki?
Because some people think that we should vote, and would be upset if I
removed the voting mechanism.
Based on what facts a feature will be approved then.
Well, the
Lesi writes:
I do not know which discussion you mean?
According to the wiki voting is still neccessary to approve a new feature.
What negative result do you fear would occur if somebody used[1] an
unapproved feature?
[1] That is, they tagged something as documented in the wiki, even if
the
What negative result do you fear would occur if somebody used[1] an
unapproved feature?
[1] That is, they tagged something as documented in the wiki, even if
the documentation is to be found in Proposed Features? I'm not a big
fan of chaotic mapping, where people apply tags randomly without
In the last days no further problems appeared and it seems that all helpful
suggestions are included now.
So let's start voting:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mineshaft
lesi
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
In the last days no further problems appeared and it seems that all
helpful
suggestions are included now.
So let's start voting:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mineshaft
lesi
It would be nice if further votes would be more serious.
If you do not like voting, do not
Lesi writes:
In the last days no further problems appeared and it seems that all
helpful
suggestions are included now.
So let's start voting:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mineshaft
It would be nice if further votes would be more serious.
If you
Hi,
Russ Nelson wrote:
You already have a consensus that no further need for changes is
needed. What more do you want? A pony? A lollipop? A vote? How is
voting once the document has been approved by everyone going to change
anything?
+1. Maybe we should set a precedent and move the
You already have a consensus that no further need for changes is
needed. What more do you want? A pony? A lollipop? A vote? How is
voting once the document has been approved by everyone going to change
anything?
Don't vote. Just start using the tag. Do we really need to revisit
this
10 matches
Mail list logo
