On Saturday 11 April 2009 00:47:46 Tim Waters (chippy) wrote:
Essentially the first bit burns ground control points into the image the
second then stretches the image and produces a geoTIFF from it. I visited
4 ground control points with my GPS each about 3km apart and at prominent
points
Peter Miller peter.miller at itoworld.com writes:
Looks interesting but. (there is unfortunately often a but)
A brief review of the license terms. The definition of Derived Work is good,
unless a derived map is a 'Digital Terrain Model' which we would need to check
with them.
Hi,
Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
No problems if some individual or a small group makes a contract, digitizes
all
what they can see from the images in their own closed factory and uploads the
results into OSM database.
This is better than nothing but should always be our last resort. During
a
On 10 Apr 2009, at 09:13, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Peter Miller peter.miller at itoworld.com writes:
Looks interesting but. (there is unfortunately often a but)
A brief review of the license terms. The definition of Derived Work
is good,
unless a derived map is a 'Digital Terrain
On 09/04/09 10:15, Mike Harris wrote:
Thanks - rather what I had thought but it was new to me. A quick comparison
of areas I know well shows OSM streets ahead (if you'll pardon the weak pun)
... I also found that it was difficult to actually do much with their data
for free other than link to
On 09/04/09 10:15, Mike Harris wrote:
Thanks - rather what I had thought but it was new to me. A quick comparison
of areas I know well shows OSM streets ahead (if you'll pardon the weak pun)
... I also found that it was difficult to actually do much with their data
for free other than link to
D Tucny wrote:
How much does a small plane with camera mount cost to hire for a day? :)
It depends on wether you're going to invite the pilot for a nice
meal :-)
I think the most tricky part of the story is still to rectify and
adjust the resulting aerial imagery. If you managed to develop a
On Friday 10 April 2009 22:05:15 Martin Spott wrote:
D Tucny wrote:
How much does a small plane with camera mount cost to hire for a day? :)
I don't know about a day but 17 overlapping images of an approximately 10 by
10 km area cost me GBP600. Once rectified they were not true plan images
2009/4/10 andrew heggie l...@sylva.icuklive.co.uk:
On Friday 10 April 2009 22:05:15 Martin Spott wrote:
D Tucny wrote:
How much does a small plane with camera mount cost to hire for a day? :)
I don't know about a day but 17 overlapping images of an approximately 10 by
10 km area cost me
El Sábado, 11 de Abril de 2009, Tim Waters (chippy) escribió:
What happens is that the distance from lens to ground is different
over varying terrain, so it doesn't match what a map would be.
These will help:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:OrthoPerspective.svg
El Sábado, 11 de Abril de 2009, Iván Sánchez Ortega escribió:
I think the way these are done are to use a digital evevation model -
I would hope the free SRTM could be sufficient?
On the contrary: AFAIK, SRTM's are done by seeing the differences between
overlapping aerial photos.
I meant
2009/4/11 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
El Sábado, 11 de Abril de 2009, Tim Waters (chippy) escribió:
I think the way these are done are to use a digital evevation model -
I would hope the free SRTM could be sufficient?
On the contrary: AFAIK, SRTM's are done by seeing the
Someone just pointed out this site to me:
http://peoplesmap.com/Default.aspx
with the claim that it was similar to OpenStreetMap and more UK-oriented than
OSM (which for some reason they thought was German-dominated - I can't imagine
why! (;)).
At a quick glance it doesn't even appear to
This is what I know. If you know more then please add it to the wiki.
http://ideasintransit.wikia.com/wiki/People%27s_Map
In summary - it isn't going anywhere and hasn't really got anywhere in
the past two years!
Regards,
Peter
On 9 Apr 2009, at 09:38, Mike Harris wrote:
Someone just
Mike Harris wrote:
Does anyone know anything about People's Map?
It's a tragic waste of good aerial imagery.
http://fakestevec.blogspot.com/2007/12/peoples-map-is-deeply-fucked.html
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/People%27s-Map-tp22966717p22967071.html
GetMapping
have found a way to enlist the innocent to enhance their commercial aerial
photography products by providing tags!
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Wood [mailto:grand.edgemas...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 April 2009 10:02
To: Mike Harris
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk
I have to admit to feeling very envious when I see the beautiful, crisp,
high-resolution aerial photographs that the People's Map guys are able to use.
It's such a waste that they have retreated into their own closed-off corner
rather than collaborating with OSM.
I can't see why someone would
2009/4/9 Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com:
Someone just pointed out this site to me:
http://peoplesmap.com/Default.aspx
with the claim that it was similar to OpenStreetMap and more UK-oriented
than OSM (which for some reason they thought was German-dominated - I can't
imagine why! (;)).
On 9 Apr 2009, at 12:59, Ed Avis wrote:
I have to admit to feeling very envious when I see the beautiful,
crisp,
high-resolution aerial photographs that the People's Map guys are
able to use.
It's such a waste that they have retreated into their own closed-off
corner
rather than
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_photography_funding_appeals
The wiki says about this supplier:
About $17 per sq km for basic 2 meter resolution photography.
I attached in the discussion page some links
I enjoyed the link! Thanks ...
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net]
Sent: 09 April 2009 10:05
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] People's Map
Mike Harris wrote:
Does anyone know anything about People's Map?
It's
Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com writes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_photography_funding_appeals
The wiki says about this supplier:
About $17 per sq km for basic 2 meter resolution photography.
Does that mean that each pixel covers an area roughly 2m by 2m? If so this is
not any
On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:44, Ed Avis wrote:
Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com writes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/
Aerial_photography_funding_appeals
The wiki says about this supplier:
About $17 per sq km for basic 2 meter resolution photography.
Does that mean that each pixel covers an
On 9 Apr 2009, at 15:25, Pieren wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_photography_funding_appeals
The wiki says about this supplier:
About $17 per sq km for basic 2 meter resolution photography.
I
2009/4/10 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com writes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_photography_funding_appeals
The wiki says about this supplier:
About $17 per sq km for basic 2 meter resolution photography.
Does that mean that each pixel covers an area
How does one go about calculating the field of view from the elevation and
resolution? Would you mind explaining that? Thank you very much.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:30 AM, D Tucny d...@tucny.com wrote:
2009/4/10 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com writes:
I didn't actually calculate the field of view in degrees, because that would
be harder at this time in the morning ;) working out how much area they
would cover is pretty simple though if you are happy to guess what
resolution camera they used... I went with a 10MP camera, such as a Canon
EOS
Ah. That made sense. A little rusty on the maths. Thanks. :)
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:34 PM, D Tucny d...@tucny.com wrote:
I didn't actually calculate the field of view in degrees, because that
would be harder at this time in the morning ;) working out how much area
they would cover is
28 matches
Mail list logo
