On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> My point here is that the WAY information provides all of the direction
> details.
[snip]
> The area detail is simple defined areas 'grouped' with the way or ways that
> make up the
> route.
So in that case, you seem to be suggesting tha
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 14:12, Lester Caine wrote:
> Richard Weait wrote:
>> Looks like somebody is doing some area- / micro- mapping.
>> http://bestofosm.org/?type=mapnik&lon=11.42994&lat=51.30053&zoom=18
>
> Nice, but still not 'micro-mapping ;)
>
> Which sides of those roads have pedestrian foo
Richard Weait wrote:
> Looks like somebody is doing some area- / micro- mapping.
> http://bestofosm.org/?type=mapnik&lon=11.42994&lat=51.30053&zoom=18
Nice, but still not 'micro-mapping ;)
Which sides of those roads have pedestrian footpaths. Is there a footpath on
the
side of the road over the
Looks like somebody is doing some area- / micro- mapping.
http://bestofosm.org/?type=mapnik&lon=11.42994&lat=51.30053&zoom=18
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
>> The bottom line is that while adding 'width' tags all the way along a road
>> may
>> be a practical half way house, other area features are not handled the same
>> way
>> so why should roads be any different.
>
> I thi
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> The bottom line is that while adding 'width' tags all the way along a road may
> be a practical half way house, other area features are not handled the same
> way
> so why should roads be any different.
I think, because roads (ways) often
I apologize for not reading every post in the original thread, but too many
other things to do :(
The real point here is combining micro mapping with macro mapping
transparently.
There are many people who will argue that once you have a 'way', it can be
tagged to define its 'area', but this mi
7 matches
Mail list logo
