On 12/15/2011 8:21 AM, Mikel Maron wrote:
Please continue any detailed discussion of this topic to legal-talk ...
that's what it's for.
The question is not what's legally true, but what conditions the OSMF
will require an object to satisfy to not be reverted. So it actually
belongs on osmf-ta
Hi,
On 12/15/2011 02:11 PM, 80n wrote:
Joint ownership is an important principle to understand. If someone
edits a way then they are making a derivative of that way and inheriting
*all* of the joint copyright ownerships.
Provided that a way is a work - maybe it isn't; maybe the whole of OSM
c: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 8:11 AM
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] An example of the complications inherent in
>determining tainted ways
>
>
>On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
>
>On 15/12/2011 13:17, David Groom wrot
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> On 15/12/2011 13:17, David Groom wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jean-Marc Liotier"
>> To:
>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:59 AM
>>
>>> But what if the source changes ? When I use high-resolution imagery to
On 15/12/2011 13:17, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Marc Liotier"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:59 AM
But what if the source changes ? When I use high-resolution imagery
to improve areas formerly mapped from low-resolution imagery, I
change the source t
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Marc Liotier"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] An example of the complications inherent in
determining tainted ways
On 15/12/2011 12:40, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message -
From: &q
On 15/12/2011 12:40, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Toby Murray"
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:47 AM
User "moonwashed" created this way by splitting it from a TIGER way.
He made several more edits to it but the last 20 versions have been by
agreeing users (includin
- Original Message -
From: "Toby Murray"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:47 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] An example of the complications inherent in
determining tainted ways
Yeah, a healthy chunk of the interstates in Kansas are the same way. I
didn't go q
Yeah, a healthy chunk of the interstates in Kansas are the same way. I
didn't go quite as deep as Nathan but this way is a relevant example:
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=33576021
User "moonwashed" created this way by splitting it from a TIGER way.
He made several more edits to it but th
On 12/14/2011 10:25 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 12/15/2011 04:11 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
So why have people been recommending for months that we remap tainted
objects when we still don't know what needs to be remapped?
If you prefer to wait until the exact rules are laid out for you,
Hi,
On 12/15/2011 04:11 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
So why have people been recommending for months that we remap tainted
objects when we still don't know what needs to be remapped?
If you prefer to wait until the exact rules are laid out for you, that's
your choice. Personally I'd rather mak
On 12/14/2011 9:45 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
It has been explained already but I'll repeat it - OSMF/LWG has not yet
decided what they will do with regards to the finer points of complex
object relicensing. This means that none of your questions above has an
answer. And OSMF is not going to decide
Hi,
On 12/15/2011 02:58 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
So what here will be reverted by the OSMF? Obviously node 250413743
needs to be replaced by another node in the same general location. But
other than that, is everything tainted because it was split from a
tainted way? Or is nothing else tainte
I will look at a single suburban roadway: Westwood Boulevard in the
International Drive tourist area south of Orlando.
This started out as a TIGER way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/11197961/history
80n (orange) and kyrbyboy (red) have made some improvements to
alignment, but have appa
14 matches
Mail list logo
