On 6/5/20 8:41 am, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 6. May 2020, at 00:08, Pierre Béland wrote:
I dont think that it is appropriate to superpose a landuse over a
waterway.
this is a good point, but you could spare the waterway out and just
tag the construction site on
sent from a phone
> On 6. May 2020, at 00:28, Tobias Knerr wrote:
>
> The =construction + construction= tagging is only really
> common for highway, building and railway tags (where it sticks around
> for historic reasons, in my impression).
interestingly, these are also the leading tags
sent from a phone
>> On 6. May 2020, at 00:08, Pierre Béland wrote:
> I dont think that it is appropriate to superpose a landuse over a waterway.
this is a good point, but you could spare the waterway out and just tag the
construction site on the land. Depending on the details, bridge span
On May 5, 2020, at 3:29 PM, Rafael Avila Coya wrote:
>> I use the lifecycle prefixes a lot, specially for shops, restaurants and
>> others that close. Like for example disused:shop=* or
>> disused:amenity=restaurant, etc. The abandoned:*=* prefix is also quite
>> useful.
This is terrific,
You may consider to use the lifecycle namespace prefix [1] to map the
bridge. In your case it would be:
construction:man_made=bridge
layer=1
In the near future, when the construction is finished and the bridge is
already operative, you just delete the construction: prefix.
I use the
On 05.05.20 22:24, Jack Armstrong wrote:
> man_made=construction
> construction=bridge
> layer=1
The =construction + construction= tagging is only really
common for highway, building and railway tags (where it sticks around
for historic reasons, in my impression).
Other tags are more likely to
On 5. May 2020, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I think the common tag would be landuse=construction
I dont think that it is appropriate to superpose a landuse over a waterway.
Since the tag man_made=bridge is used, it seems better to refer to the
construction project with the tags as
sent from a phone
> On 5. May 2020, at 22:27, Jack Armstrong wrote:
>
> I assume the best way to map a large bridge area that's under construction
> would be with the minimum following tags? I'm not asking about the ways
> associated with/on the bridge.
>
> man_made=construction
>
I assume the best way to map a large bridge area that's under construction would be with the minimum following tags? I'm not asking about the ways associated with/on the bridge.man_made=constructionconstruction=bridgelayer=1
___
talk mailing list
9 matches
Mail list logo
